Comments on: Windows Live offers Microsoft a quicker turnaround
In Redmond's new "rolling thunder" approach to services, Windows Live releases arrive with lightning speed.
In Redmond's new "rolling thunder" approach to services, Windows Live releases arrive with lightning speed.
November 27, 2009 4:27 PM PST
November 27, 2009 1:05 PM PST
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
minutes, even the greatest MS fan would have to admit that
nothing was actually happening. Can't hardly tell whether or not an
MS product is any good if you can't get to the product.
So far, this one is an absolute loser. At least, now anything in
Windows Live's future would be an improvement.
FireFox. But now that I get to see Windows Live, it seems rather
obvious that Windows Live is essentially the same as Google,
Netscape, or other opening pages. Nothing seems novel, but then
I'm not too sure that by now, the Windows Live approach itself is in
any way novel. Just one more hog at the trough, And there are
bigger and better hogs already there.
More than a dozen "new" products? I don't see one yet.
This seems like nothing but a publicity stunt. Re-package everything that everyone else has been doing for a while and call it "innovation".
Certainly, a company with the resources that Microsoft has should be leading computer industry innovation. But there is more to innovation than clever marketing, which is all I've seen from Live so far.
http://ideas.live.com/
I didn't know Office Live was actually available
The sad thing is that people will follow along, and because it supposedly eliminates piracy, the government will allow this extortion scheme to continue, regardless of the supposed rights of the end user.
Even if these "Web Services" are free, they shouldn't be used. If MS gives something for free, they are only doing so to stifle competition.
So far, I have not seen anything new or very innovative on live.com. The news I read here, or netscape. They usually have the more interesting headlines. For search, I have google. Basically, there is a better (or at least more popular alternative) to anything live.com has to offer. Sorry Microsoft, you will not convert me today!
The thing with Microsoft is that they cannot help themselves when it comes to bloat. Everything they do ends up big and fat like them. I remember when Messenger was lighter than ICQ, now it is a fat dog. Google is the only company who knows how to create light and fast products and services and keep them that way. Google's products work well with none of the extra crap.
When I order a hamburger I don't want all the extra stuff unless I ask for it.
Microsoft just cannot goooooogle, coz they are toooo fat.
Google talk within the browser is a proud example of this. I congratulate whoever came up with that idea. You rock Google.
http://ideas.live.com/
Quite a collection of offerings for most purposes. But it looks very staid when compared to the askjeeves
Congrats for a 100 pages of Googles search all for the keywords "EARL BENSER" and all point to CNET news postings by you. The number of searches made are for a total of 205,000 listings most of them repeated. However there are a 100 pages of your acheivement.
I believe someone should intimate Cnnet on this. This is another newsworthy story by itself! Way to go, Macatic... ;)
But, I don't lay claim to 'Macatic'. since I run PC's and Mac's both.
Mac's more than PC's, to be sure, but the Mac's do most of what
I want to de better than the PC's - at least I think so. The PC's
are needed for the programs not available on a Mac - like the
software I license to my clients, and for other PC only
applications.
I will give the PC credit where credit is due. It just doesn't
happen all that often.
TY and the rest of the anti Earl lobby (Includes me, of course) would see red.....
- Microsoft Live mail...
- by zman2121 March 17, 2006 12:10 PM PST
- had alot of errors... took it off and will not reinstall... to be nice, it had no gravity...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(47 Comments)