Comments on: Google deal highlights Web 2.0 boom

Is Google's acquisition of Web word processor Writely a harbinger of more acquisitions? Dozens of Web 2.0-style start-ups certainly hope so.

[thedevilbegone]

Viva open source..

I guess all these applications would just be open source and available freely online..
More like the winamp from Nullsoft.

[SqlserverCode]

One difference

The big difference is that the small web 2.0 companies don't get the crazy venture capital that happened the last time around
Some of them get purchased while they are still small (flikr, del.icio.us, etc etc)

http://otherthingsnow.blogspot.com/

[locoHost]

Bandwith, sure, but tech requirements?

<hr>RedMonk's O'Grady expects that many more Web 2.0 companies will need to be acquired, or they will simply burn out. That's because growing a hosted Web application beyond a few hundred, or even a few thousand, users requires substantial resources and technical expertise.</hr>

So exactly how do the resource requirements change as your user base expands? Bandwidth, is all I can think of. That's cheap. Now what as far as the "technical expertise" requirements change as the user count grows?

[BillyWarhol]

Exciting!

these are exciting times for sure!!

what could possibly be more Boring than Microsoft Office!!

;))

[hypermark]

Web 2.0 Boom and The Year of Internet Video

Two quick comments. One is that any way you slice it, this is the year of Internet video, and I believe that the advertising, user engagement and content distribution goodness that Internet video will play in evolving old media to new media will be increasingly staggering as the year progresses.

To frame this one, a video clip sharing service like vSocial (which I am a cofounder of) is generating over 71M monthly pageviews, 270K unique daily visitors and serving up over 1.5M videos A DAY. That is almost 19 clips watched every second of the day, which speaks to engagement, reach and power of this platform.

Two is that the moral of the story behind the emergence of user-generated content services, such as vSocial, TypePad and Digg is that you can not "game" the process of deciding which content is conversational, what conversations are acceptable and where the conversations can occur.

Consumers will decided what is compelling, interesting and worthy of chit chat and do so at the virtual water cooler of their choosing.

The best smart content owners will be able to do is provide some kindling wood to encourage sparks of inspiration, but basically then get out of the way and allow consumers to do the talking (or not).

Understandably, this is at odds with the way media has traditionally worked, and there will be lots of fits and starts, but the emergence of the blogosphere where millions of bloggers excerpt and point back to original media articles in their posts, seems instructive of where all of this is headed.

Will be an interesting story to watch as it develops, to be sure.

Regards,

Mark Sigal
-----
vSocial: The Video Clip Sharing Community: www.vsocial.com
Tell stories, start conversations, extend the web -- with video

[xtme]

Hey Mark

Read your comment very well done- I'm the owner of xtme.net we are a media lending software system you can see some screenshots here http://www.xtme.net/download.html

We are looking for company's with content so we populate the software with content but also help promote your web site - if your interested hit me back @ [e-mail]

Thanks!

[dysonl]

Fun and Cool but Will It Fly?

I think Peter Rip summed it up nicely: "consumer mashups are intriguing and fun, but solid business models around the notion of sharing information are few and far between. I see some real problems in turning mashups from an interesting parlor trick into a real business [http://...|http://...]"

I have a hard time imagining the masses adopting this new breed of applications. First, it'll take a major shift in people's mentality for accepting to pay a monthly fee for a service instead of owning the software on his/her PC. Second, if the service is ads-based, then IMHO it will not work because people use the apps to get a job done in the first place -- people will not stop working and click on ads! Third, corporations will most likely be reluctant having their data reside on someone else's servers. (If the servers are on the customer's premises, then that's a different story.) Fourth, network outage! Already now, when that occurs, most people in my company can't continue working because emails don't work. Imagine what would happen to a web-services-centric company!

I think these web2.0 apps will simply become yet another nice and cool feature web giants such as Yahoo! and Google will offer to keep their general web-users base and attract new users, without having any expectation of generating significant revenue from them.