Comments on: Tech executives: Time is of the essence

Executives from Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, IBM and other companies gather to talk about the next killer app: calendaring.

[Bong Dizon]

Uh, we have PDAs

In essence, there's nothing truly new about this technology. We've had PDAs and PIM software for over a decade now. This "new" technology is just about making these existing devices and software smarter and more connected.

[Acpinho1]

Excel and Paper work for me

I use a small Excel macro I bought on a website and allows me to post Paper calendars on the office wall that everybody understands.

Sometime, paper is still your best friend, even if create it on a PC.

http://www.officehelp.biz/officehelp/viewcontents.asp?cl=Macro&id=00002&ent=Cal

[aaroberts]

The Future is now

Network solutions hosts my site and they give you 50 email addresses with the package, which also includes a mini office product... which ALSO includes a shareable calendar.

I uploaded my calendar from outlook at home to my calendar on the web and now my entire family can update it.

I imagine I could download it to work, but I don't want my personal stuff in my work calendar.

[Don_Dodge]

They all want to "own" your calendar

As Ray Ozzie pointed out in his SSE blog "announcement" the problem with most of the existing calendar solutions is that they all want to "own" the calendar. Meaning, they all want to import events from other calendars, but they don't want to export or synch with other calendars. This approach forces the user to have yet another calendar, when what they really want is to have their existing calendars synch with each other, and with selected friends and colleagues. This is the problem SSE was designed to fix.

There are some cool start-ups working on the calendar problem including; Timebridge, Trumba, Zvents, Kalookoo, and others. I did a review of the calendar problem and the various approaches of these and other start-ups in my blog today. You can see the whole story at http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2005/12/time_for_calend.html

More than that

They want to own your time. The "future" described in this article seems silly. Online sharable & open standard calendar programs will not solve any problems that my Day Planner or PDA doesn't already address. If this is the direction that Ray Ozzie and other visionaries are thinging, then the set of problems that IT can solve is getting thin indeed.

[jjocke]

This Killer App almost exists

Where many of the attempts to create a truly useful application fail is that once an event is entered into a calendar, it is a static piece of information. If the details change i.e. time, date or location - there is no way to automatically alert the people with that event in the calendar of the change.

Infuzer (www.infuzer.com) has addressed this issue with a pretty unique solution that is also cross-platform compatible. They keep a central store of the most up to date information on the events and regularly sync the entries to make sure that any changes are sent to everyone with that event in their calendar. They also have devised a way to enter events remotely to other people's Outlook, Palm or Lotus calendars once an approval between calendar users has been established.

These guys are on the cusp of something big and with their win for the NBC Olympics website, they are set to become a much more ballyhooed outfit.

[mcnevich]

We shouldn't have to go online...

I would love to see an app that opens directly to my daily schedule as soon as my computer starts up, with page tabs for maybe the next 7 days and tabs for all months...it shouldn't be necessary for me to go to a google/yahoo/msn etc. site, sign in, and then get to my calendar.

[cndkc]

Duh

Sounds like M/S Outlook to me.

[czorrilla]

History re-written

Stefanie Olsen seems to ignore that it was Louts who really introduced an useful electronic calendar and organizer in the pc.

[jamie.p.walsh]

Just create an XML standard like RSS did for blogs and news.

Create a calendar schema or event tag.

While we're at it, why doesn't the W3C standardize an ADDRESS format and a PHONE format. When web programmers tag data as address or phone number, the browser can use it to add it to contacts or dial it right out of the document.

Why has this not become as ubiquitous as the hyperlink yet?

[cndkc]

Just?

WRT to phones, it isn't that ubiquitous yet because only expensive (mobile) phones could use it. Maybe there is a market for bluetooth enabled desk/house phones that can interact with you PC/PDA to make it happen.

[208774626618253979477959487856]

go tech!

http://www.analogstereo.com/cadillac_srx_owners_manual.htm