Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume

Comments on: Google builds an empire to rival Microsoft

Search giant could become more important than Redmond rival, says author who has studied its patents and engineering.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Google Linux
by Peej2K September 21, 2005 8:37 AM PDT
Surely, a Google Distribution of an open OS is going to be their
major move.

Ubuntu seem primed to be the first home user friendly distro. I
could see Google making a move on them in the near future,
and bundling Google Earth, Picasa, Google Talk, Google Desktop
Search, GMail and a Web Application Office Suite into it.

They could also make the distro available to x86, x64 and
PowerPC processors, meaning not only could you run it on AMD
and Intel machines, as well as Mac's, but in theory you could run
it on the Playstation 3, Nintendo Revolution and of course, XBox
360.
Reply to this comment
Not forgetting
by Peej2K September 21, 2005 8:41 AM PDT
That ever increasing space that you use on GMail could also be
used to save all of your documents for the AJAX Google Office
suite, and allow you to synchronise your personal information and
photographs onto Google's service, ala .Mac
Thin Client
by alucinor September 21, 2005 12:23 PM PDT
It's likely they'll use Linux as a thin client, rather than a full-blown desktop OS. It's also likely that instead of attacking desktop PCs head on, they just outflank that market with a Google-branded smartphone running Linux.

But this would be assuming that controlling the client-side is in their plans at all. Maybe they think that the server-side is all they need ... if that's the case, then they better be planning on how to react when Microsoft starts leveraging their client-side dominance in their new MSN push.
Thin Client
by alucinor September 21, 2005 12:24 PM PDT
It's likely they'll use Linux as a thin client, rather than a full-blown desktop OS. It's also likely that instead of attacking desktop PCs head on, they just outflank that market with a Google-branded smartphone running Linux.

But this would be assuming that controlling the client-side is in their plans at all. Maybe they think that the server-side is all they need ... if that's the case, then they better be planning on how to react when Microsoft starts leveraging their client-side dominance in their new MSN push.
Thin Client
by alucinor September 21, 2005 12:25 PM PDT
It's likely they'll use Linux as a thin client, rather than a full-blown desktop OS. It's also likely that instead of attacking desktop PCs head on, they just outflank that market with a Google-branded smartphone running Linux.

But this would be assuming that controlling the client-side is in their plans at all. Maybe they think that the server-side is all they need ... if that's the case, then they better be planning on how to react when Microsoft starts leveraging their client-side dominance in their new MSN push.
Never heard of Ubuntu
by nmcphers September 21, 2005 1:05 PM PDT
It sure as heck isn't a 'home-user-friendly' name. How about they start with a simple non-geek name that make sense and people can pronounce and spell?
View all 3 replies
Skynet!
by jm1234567890 September 21, 2005 3:02 PM PDT
Obviously this is google's plan
Reply to this comment
Competition is good in this case
by September 21, 2005 9:03 PM PDT
I think more competition is good in this case. Linux forced Microsoft to rethink it's startegy and Microsoft users had some benefit from it. Likewise, I think competition from Google can make Microsoft more sensitive to user needs.

Khalid
http://www.ozevision.com
http://www.oneplanet.net.au
Reply to this comment
Competition is great
by mstlyevil September 22, 2005 10:07 PM PDT
Competition is what ultimately makes a capitalist society superior to full blown socialism. Capitalism without competition becomes fascism and then we have a system as oppressive if not more than a socialist society. I hope there are more competitors to MS and Google in the years ahead including open source.
Increased competition
by CharlesJo.com September 25, 2005 7:19 PM PDT
I totally agree with the increased competition thread. I want to see more players competing to improve consumer experience. Whether it's Google, Yahoo, or AOL, I want to see more neato products and services.

As for the Google Linux thread, I am not sure that's a good idea for the same reasons others have mentioned. I have no doubt that the Google geniuses can produce a consumer-friendly Linux distro. My concern would be using those dollars in other more interesting projects.

Charles Jo
www.charlesjo.com
Where did the Linux discussion come from..
by ahickey September 22, 2005 12:13 AM PDT
I just looked at the article again and there is no mention of Linux doing a desktop Linux.

Imagine a world where the Desktop OS isn't important. If all your office apps where served over the web. This was kind of the vision of JAVA and it looks like Google are doing their own version of it.

Firstly the market for office applications would decline. Then thin clients of any type could be used.

Instant On.
All info available anywhere.
No Notebook required. Just hot desk to a free PC and get at all your information and documents.

This could be where Google is going, or they may decide to hold the high ground on search and Internet Services and make their money from advertising and licencing their technology.

I think moving business from Office (Word/Excel) is tougher than moving then from Windows.

All the main Operating System can look and interact like Windows if you want them to, but the interface/menu struture for the applications is always a bit unique.

Compete on Office and the rest will follow.
Reply to this comment
It came
by Peej2K September 22, 2005 6:20 AM PDT
From my summerising of the article, then making my own personal
statement.

I think Google will go for the Desktop at some point, or at least put
backing into someone who wants to desperately go for the
desktop.
Linux is used by Google
by mstlyevil September 22, 2005 10:11 PM PDT
Google already uses only Linux on it's servers, so if it moved to a desktop application it would more than likely involve some type of linux code.
The free public network computer is already here
by iqula September 22, 2005 12:56 AM PDT
Google's ambitions will finally reveal a a
service simular to the free for life personal
online desktop like the one provided by
http://www.cosmopod.com
Reply to this comment
Google's Empire will be great for the cross-platform Computing World!
by JuggerNaut September 22, 2005 8:42 AM PDT
Making seamless cross-platform compatibility a paradise in the not
so distant future. The Internet and the World Wide Wed was born
to be cross-platform and Google is our only hope to return it to its
roots.
Reply to this comment
^ ignore this one ^
by JuggerNaut September 22, 2005 8:44 AM PDT
*NM*
Google's Empire will be great for the cross-platform Computing World!
by JuggerNaut September 22, 2005 8:43 AM PDT
Making seamless cross-platform compatibility a paradise in the not
so distant future. The Internet and the World Wide Web was born
to be cross-platform and Google is our only hope to return it to its
roots.
Reply to this comment
Skynet? Nah...
by Betty Roper September 22, 2005 9:46 AM PDT
We welcome our new search engine overlord masters!
Reply to this comment
Don't trust them
by Bill Dautrive September 22, 2005 6:56 PM PDT
First is why would someone want to do this? It is not a new concept. back in the day it was a bunch of monitors and keyboards plugged into a mainframe. This is somewhat similar. What happens when connections drop? There is a lot to be said for having your own system that isn't dependant on anything, other then being plugged into an electrical outlet.

Next, there is the innate untrustworthiness of Google. They basically believe they are entitled to cache any data they want at anytime. Look at their policies, it is a sleazy out-out system, not an ethical opt-in one. GMail is a terrible system, users give them free access and they happily index it and their privacy policy is too vague. They have every single search you have done, matched with your IP, they save that crap forever. These sorts of actions put them close to Microsoft on the high-end of the sleaze meter.

Google has similar god-like attitudes, but has a can't-do-any-wrong rep from the general public. Just like microsoft used to have. All this shows is the ignorance of most computer users. They just buy into whatever the hype is today, regardless of past actions of the company.

Trusting your data to Google is as stupid as trusting it to MS.
Reply to this comment
The point is...
by Mendz September 22, 2005 7:45 PM PDT
The future can offer a lot of web-based services and applications which allow thin clients to be more popular compared to fully loaded devices like laptops where most of the applications are locally installed. Thus, the early release of web services, web APIs and web applications... ?

Of course, the success of these online products depend on the infrastructure and architecture of the Internet to offer 99.99999% if not 100% reliabile and dependable network connectivity. Thus, the dark fibers... ?

Then you gather a customer base to know and recognize your brand. So that when the time comes, you have a brand and cult following just like with Microsoft, Apple and Linux...

The Google empire is in the making...
Reply to this comment
Calm down Mr. Arnold
by September 23, 2005 4:45 AM PDT
Google is not looking to take over the desktop. A greater reality is they intend to become an ISP providing WiFi access from across thier network. They are not the only player here either, AT&T and Verison are doing the same thing using 802.11 technology. Cingular is trying to do it starting with a UMTS network.

I am sure Google will do very well with this venture, but if they go after the desktop I'll bet on Microsoft's $38B in cash from earnings against Google's $7B from stock sales.
Reply to this comment
Calm down Mr. Arnold
by September 23, 2005 4:45 AM PDT
Google is not looking to take over the desktop. A greater reality is they intend to become an ISP providing WiFi access from across thier network. They are not the only player here either, AT&T and Verison are doing the same thing using 802.11 technology. Cingular is trying to do it starting with a UMTS network.

I am sure Google will do very well with this venture, but if they go after the desktop I'll bet on Microsoft's $38B in cash from earnings against Google's $7B from stock sales.
Reply to this comment
What is this guy smoking?
by September 23, 2005 8:22 AM PDT
"Unlike Google, Microsoft does not focus on performance as an end in itself. As a result,
Microsoft gets performance the way most computer users do. Microsoft buys or
upgrades machines. Microsoft does not fiddle with its operating systems and their
subfunctions to get that extra time slice or two out of the hardware." - This is a crazy statement to make about any company, let alone Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
a free web based full blown office
by September 29, 2005 5:12 AM PDT
a free, open source web based full blown office package with strong collaboration capabilities is what is beeing developed at www.nyandu.com
WITH NO SOFTWARE INSTALATION other than the browser
Reply to this comment
gofo de las nieves
by gofo de las nieves November 5, 2007 2:27 PM PST
boludo si sos vos contestame este mail urgente
(34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement