Comments on: Yahoo pictures easier photo sharing
Site launches a beta for free e-mail service designed to let subscribers more easily send and share digital photos.
Images: Yahoo puts its stamp on photo sharing
Site launches a beta for free e-mail service designed to let subscribers more easily send and share digital photos.
Images: Yahoo puts its stamp on photo sharing
December 31, 2009 2:10 PM PST
December 31, 2009 11:39 AM PST
December 31, 2009 11:26 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
rofl, since when has Yahoo! provided the "number one" email service?
rofl, since when has Yahoo! provided the "number one" email service?
me cringe. How is their service goign to make it
easier to share photos (or anything else)?
I, like many others, have a broadband Internet
connection. The easiest way to share photos are:
drag them to a folder on my computer and share
it via HTTP, or mount remote directory at an ISP
and drag and drop to that. So plain and simple
that a monkey could do it.
So why is it again that they offer a service
with this flaky and awkward web-based
file-upload and management that doesn't
integrate with my desktop environment? Oh,
that's right, they "just don't get it." (tm)
In fact many of the BIG media outlets, such as this news.com too - are major share holders in Yahoor or Google or are held by same Institutional investors.
[Edited by: admin on Jun 6, 2005 11:40 AM]
I also agree that it should simply be a folder on the desktop that you paste your photos into, but a lot of users wouldn't be able to do that either.
For myself, I use Francois's http solution for sharing. But I also have a folder on my mac they I applescripted. I drag a file into it and it's attached to an email and addressed and sent.
The point though is that software makers don't realize most of their users have no idea about how to use their products.
me cringe. How is their service goign to make it
easier to share photos (or anything else)?
I, like many others, have a broadband Internet
connection. The easiest way to share photos are:
drag them to a folder on my computer and share
it via HTTP, or mount remote directory at an ISP
and drag and drop to that. So plain and simple
that a monkey could do it.
So why is it again that they offer a service
with this flaky and awkward web-based
file-upload and management that doesn't
integrate with my desktop environment? Oh,
that's right, they "just don't get it." (tm)
In fact many of the BIG media outlets, such as this news.com too - are major share holders in Yahoor or Google or are held by same Institutional investors.
[Edited by: admin on Jun 6, 2005 11:40 AM]
I also agree that it should simply be a folder on the desktop that you paste your photos into, but a lot of users wouldn't be able to do that either.
For myself, I use Francois's http solution for sharing. But I also have a folder on my mac they I applescripted. I drag a file into it and it's attached to an email and addressed and sent.
The point though is that software makers don't realize most of their users have no idea about how to use their products.
[Edited by: admin on Jun 6, 2005 11:39 AM]
[Edited by: admin on Jun 6, 2005 11:39 AM]
- uh..IE only?
- by totorototoro May 26, 2005 3:10 PM PDT
- gee, thanks.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)