Comments on: Is it finally time for 3D online?
Interest in 3D technology for the Web is picking up, and this time it's no false alarm, says VRML co-creator Tony Parisi.
Interest in 3D technology for the Web is picking up, and this time it's no false alarm, says VRML co-creator Tony Parisi.
January 5, 2010 10:35 PM PST
January 5, 2010 7:48 PM PST
January 5, 2010 6:00 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
This is a 3D forensic system from SGI. Note the comment:
"The importance of this system, of this 3-D reconstruction, is that we can face a world that is similar to the one we know," Francesco Camana, technical director of forensics science office of the Italian state police.."
As someone working in the public safety industry and familiar with the emerging DHS requirements for NIMS/NRP, a showstopper aspect of these technologies is the capability to roll-up or aggregate this data into other systems. The web is not simply publish/subscribe; it is an aggregating system. To use 3D for these and C3 applications, we must have standard formats for ALL of the data types we share.
So while Flash is a good app and chat is an application much improved by 3D, the national and global interests for mission critical systems rely on standard interoperable formats. Again, we have to turn to the people and vendors with a long credible history of creating open formats and with COTS products.
X3D is the format of choise, and that this must interoperate on the web is evident to anyone who understands the problem of scalable systems.
"The purpose of the 3D Industry Forum will be to: Further the adoption of 3D by establishing 3DIF technologies and standards as well accepted and widely deployed offerings utilized by content developers, software and hardware ISV?s, governmental entities and end users..."
I'm not really sure what the implications of U3D are/will be, (particularly for web 3D) but there seems to be an impressive listing of companies involved such as Intel, Adobe, Microsoft...
http://www.3dif.org/
This is a 3D forensic system from SGI. Note the comment:
"The importance of this system, of this 3-D reconstruction, is that we can face a world that is similar to the one we know," Francesco Camana, technical director of forensics science office of the Italian state police.."
As someone working in the public safety industry and familiar with the emerging DHS requirements for NIMS/NRP, a showstopper aspect of these technologies is the capability to roll-up or aggregate this data into other systems. The web is not simply publish/subscribe; it is an aggregating system. To use 3D for these and C3 applications, we must have standard formats for ALL of the data types we share.
So while Flash is a good app and chat is an application much improved by 3D, the national and global interests for mission critical systems rely on standard interoperable formats. Again, we have to turn to the people and vendors with a long credible history of creating open formats and with COTS products.
X3D is the format of choise, and that this must interoperate on the web is evident to anyone who understands the problem of scalable systems.
"The purpose of the 3D Industry Forum will be to: Further the adoption of 3D by establishing 3DIF technologies and standards as well accepted and widely deployed offerings utilized by content developers, software and hardware ISV?s, governmental entities and end users..."
I'm not really sure what the implications of U3D are/will be, (particularly for web 3D) but there seems to be an impressive listing of companies involved such as Intel, Adobe, Microsoft...
http://www.3dif.org/
Making a good 3D standard (engine) is much more complicated than the internet analogy proposed in the article. Therefore it will be proprietary software, like e.g. TurnTool that will probably become the 'standard', due to the visual quality they deliver and user friendliness for the developers. The VRML standard is currently used to 'transport' files from one 3D software suite to another. This is the justification of the standard, not the presentation of a final result.
Respect to all the guys who is making web 3D. I work within the industry and gets the feeling it is starting to take off every day with more and more requests
Making a good 3D standard (engine) is much more complicated than the internet analogy proposed in the article. Therefore it will be proprietary software, like e.g. TurnTool that will probably become the 'standard', due to the visual quality they deliver and user friendliness for the developers. The VRML standard is currently used to 'transport' files from one 3D software suite to another. This is the justification of the standard, not the presentation of a final result.
Respect to all the guys who is making web 3D. I work within the industry and gets the feeling it is starting to take off every day with more and more requests
There is major potential to make serious money from this genre, but who will try and control it? Can the small developers compete with the major and highly funded organisations? Time will tell.
We have all seen this before. The monopily of a format. Is this going to happen here? One format adopted so that no other can be used? I think it is time to allow competition to grow the full force of creativity to show exactly what 3D can offer on the web.
Kind regards Brian
There is major potential to make serious money from this genre, but who will try and control it? Can the small developers compete with the major and highly funded organisations? Time will tell.
We have all seen this before. The monopily of a format. Is this going to happen here? One format adopted so that no other can be used? I think it is time to allow competition to grow the full force of creativity to show exactly what 3D can offer on the web.
Kind regards Brian
Will the smaller players be able to compete with the major players? That is the question.
There is some amazing work being done with individuals not associated with the major organisations, who may create a threat to their investment. Time will tell what happens.
Will the major players try to monopololise the situation to make it impossible for the smaller players to get ahead? At the end of the day, it is all about dollars, not what can be achieved for the betterment of the casual web surfer. I believe that the potential to make some real money through this genre is incredible, so it stands to reason, that the major players will try and knock out their opposition where they can. We are living in the future of the internet and the results will be interesting, however, there is a bigger fish to be caught, that of Interactive Television. With it's huge bandwidth, will offer far more realistic Immersivce 3D content. This is why the majors are so worried about the small fish gaining any ground. Think about it, makes sence does'nt it?
Kind regards Brian
Will the smaller players be able to compete with the major players? That is the question.
There is some amazing work being done with individuals not associated with the major organisations, who may create a threat to their investment. Time will tell what happens.
Will the major players try to monopololise the situation to make it impossible for the smaller players to get ahead? At the end of the day, it is all about dollars, not what can be achieved for the betterment of the casual web surfer. I believe that the potential to make some real money through this genre is incredible, so it stands to reason, that the major players will try and knock out their opposition where they can. We are living in the future of the internet and the results will be interesting, however, there is a bigger fish to be caught, that of Interactive Television. With it's huge bandwidth, will offer far more realistic Immersivce 3D content. This is why the majors are so worried about the small fish gaining any ground. Think about it, makes sence does'nt it?
Kind regards Brian
Lets also remember that HTML took nearly 20+ years to get right. And no it didn't start with Mosaic. It was first demoed By Douglas Englebart in 1969. Used to link all previous research with the new research data. It was called Hypertext.
- didn't they say that about flash?
- by Astinsan February 18, 2008 7:43 PM PST
- I remember hearing the same think about movie clips on the internet. Now its in so many places that its annoying. (flash ads, myspace's dern audio player)
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (70 Comments)Lets also remember that HTML took nearly 20+ years to get right. And no it didn't start with Mosaic. It was first demoed By Douglas Englebart in 1969. Used to link all previous research with the new research data. It was called Hypertext.