Comments on: Firefox 1.1 delayed
Next version has slipped three months, but allegations that Google is root cause dismissed as "wacky speculation."
Next version has slipped three months, but allegations that Google is root cause dismissed as "wacky speculation."
December 6, 2009 10:40 PM PST
December 6, 2009 9:00 PM PST
December 6, 2009 8:40 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
- Volunteers Fall Short
- by David Arbogast January 31, 2005 2:20 PM PST
- Crazy speculation? Who is making these ridiculous claims... that one man is slowing development of an entire open-source project? I haven't heard that... Obviously, they just aren't getting the volunteer support they need in order to stay on schedule...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Volunteer support lacking? You know this how?
- by dejo January 31, 2005 3:51 PM PST
- "Obviously, they just aren't getting the volunteer support they
- Like this
-
- Truth be told this is the first time I have heard of Firefox 1.1.
- by System Tyrant January 31, 2005 6:01 PM PST
- Maybe that's why you aren't hearing a lot of complaints. I wasn't expecting it so I'm not getting all bent out of shape about it being delayed. When Microsoft doesn't hype the release of there products people don't usually get irate about them either.
- Like this
-
- MS does FUD so people get upset !!!
- by cbazza February 1, 2005 8:52 AM PST
- Thing is MS is famous for FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt)
- Like this
-
(5 Comments)Its interesting that none of the browser's fans are complaining... when Microsoft slips a schedule, the people who claim to never use Microsoft software create an uproar... Of course, if you aren't directly contributing to an open-source project, you probably have no right to complain. But then, what right do you have to complain about MS software schedules if you aren't using their software?
need in order to stay on schedule..."
And you're accusing them of crazy speculation?
Of course this theory is shot full of holes, but maybe Microsoft people are just too uptight and cranky and Open Source guys are more laid back.
Another speculation. Maybe people get cranking about Microsoft products because they give you a date and delay it 50 times before it is finally released. Or because it's a support pack to fix problems that people need fixed today not a year from now.
And now that I've got you Microsoft guys mad, I'm just having fun. I don't have a clue why people get angry over Microsoft delays and not Open Source. Hey, let them delay Firefox 1.1 a few (50) times and then check back, I would imaging people will be screaming then.
So people should attack MS is they don't deliver what
they promise because the original promise was simply
made public in an attempt to create FUD. This is their
ageless approach to slow down or kill a new product or
company that has promising technology.
So the problem is that MS has alterior motives to pre-announce
whereas the open source people don't.