Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Police Blotter: MySpace profile sets convicted felon free

Man convicted of molesting two girls gets new trial after appeals court agrees jurors shouldn't have perused MySpace for one girl's profile.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Problem
by nmoore6676 November 30, 2007 11:31 AM PST
With the prolific amounts of information available in our connected society it is going to be more and more difficult to restrict the information jurors bring into their deliberations. It will be difficult to get people to serve if total sequestration is imposed, more people might risk contempt charges and simply refuse to report when summoned. Then there is the issue of what prospective jurors have read, seen and heard prior to the trial. What to do?
Reply to this comment
what to do?
by tres1973 November 30, 2007 12:15 PM PST
Have appointed jurors from every zip in the United States sequestered for 30 days to hear as many cases as they can. Pay them, train them and let them decide cases based on evidence presented during trial only. Have them deliberate without any communication outside of that room.
View reply
Naw, the problem
by suyts December 4, 2007 10:42 AM PST
is the lack of an IQ test for jurors. The fact that these Jurors thought that they would find anything credible or pertinent in a MySpace site posted by a 13 y/o should be criminal. Now, because of their idiocy, we potential have a child molester walking free. The problem is that while they were busy doing their "Matlock/Serlock" impersinations, they couldn't descern that they were doing the wrong thing all the while sitting in judgement of another person.
Problem
by nmoore6676 November 30, 2007 11:31 AM PST
With the prolific amounts of information available in our connected society it is going to be more and more difficult to restrict the information jurors bring into their deliberations. It will be difficult to get people to serve if total sequestration is imposed, more people might risk contempt charges and simply refuse to report when summoned. Then there is the issue of what prospective jurors have read, seen and heard prior to the trial. What to do?
Reply to this comment
what to do?
by tres1973 November 30, 2007 12:15 PM PST
Have appointed jurors from every zip in the United States sequestered for 30 days to hear as many cases as they can. Pay them, train them and let them decide cases based on evidence presented during trial only. Have them deliberate without any communication outside of that room.
View reply
Naw, the problem
by suyts December 4, 2007 10:42 AM PST
is the lack of an IQ test for jurors. The fact that these Jurors thought that they would find anything credible or pertinent in a MySpace site posted by a 13 y/o should be criminal. Now, because of their idiocy, we potential have a child molester walking free. The problem is that while they were busy doing their "Matlock/Serlock" impersinations, they couldn't descern that they were doing the wrong thing all the while sitting in judgement of another person.
Wrong headline
by zclayton2 December 4, 2007 11:32 AM PST
The headline should read "Idiot Juror who can't follow judge's instructions allows convicted felon to go free". That Juror should be incarcerated on contemp of court charges until the new trail starts.
Reply to this comment
Wrong headline
by zclayton2 December 4, 2007 11:32 AM PST
The headline should read "Idiot Juror who can't follow judge's instructions allows convicted felon to go free". That Juror should be incarcerated on contemp of court charges until the new trail starts.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement