Comments on: File-sharing 'graveyard' still filling up
The MPAA's legal strategy hasn't done much to slow down online piracy of movies. But will that save TorrentSpy?
The MPAA's legal strategy hasn't done much to slow down online piracy of movies. But will that save TorrentSpy?
January 3, 2010 12:20 PM PST
January 3, 2010 12:10 PM PST
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Why not go after the hacker groups that are supplying the stuff, thats a lot smaller number than the bajillion end users out there. The suppliers will always do it because the can, even if 1 or none download the content, but if end users have no content to download, end of story.
Just my stupid opinion
Secondly, the MPAA doesn't loose as much money as it says it does to p2p filesharing. If anything both the MPAA and RIAA have benefitted somewhat from this. More and more studies are showing that the actual cause for the decline in sales has to do with how much dvds cost as well as the average movie at any corporate theater.
The truth is, if the MPAA and RIAA are allowed to continue their assult on websites that do NOT profit off of their hosting of torrents, they will soon be granted the power to ask any site for their logs. This would be yet another attack on the privacy of individuals all in order for them to make more money and destroy those who are weaker than them.
http://phoenixlabs.org/pg2/
the least. The most pirated media is pornography and that
industry is booming. If piracy really did hurt the XXX business
would be out of business. Most people who download pirated
movies would not buy them in the first place so it is not a lost
sale. Many downloaders buy movies if they really like them.
Second, don't use P2P. Use newsgroups instead. There is actually
more content available, it is totally anonymous, and it is under
the radar of the copyright goons.
Good downloading all!
If you disagree with the law, the go change the law. In the meantime, it still is theft.
Please read deeper into the story. The MPAA's spokesman is quoted as well as Richard Charnley, an attorney who has worked for ABC and Fox. Also I said at that the entertainment industry was responsible for bringing the suits against Napster, Scour and the rest of the companies listed at the very beginning of the story. Thanks for reading. GS
Nowhere does the author condone "stealing" but simply points out that the technology (i.e. Bitorrent, P2P, etc) can't (and probably shouldn't) be stiffled simply because the entertainment industry hasn't figured it out yet, and gives a brilliant example with the VCR. If the MPAA and their ilk had their way we would not be able to "steal" TV shows for later watching and use. Those same arguments would have also killed off "next gen" items like Tivo before they could have gotten off the ground under the same "theft" premise.
So, all in all, the biggest problem is you reading into the story things that just aren't there.
All they have done is transformed and advanced.
Think of napster with that service you could only trade music files.
When it got killed Napster became kazaa, when that died kazaa became edonkey, when that died edonkey became emule, torrents, nzb, etc...
it's not death your seeing its evolution in action.
If we want to save Hollywood, we must stamp out unauthorized creativity now!
As for quotes: so there is one from the right holder's perspective for every 9 arguing that theft is ok for technical reasons (technology marches on, etc.). This is clearly not an even story.
Most of the names people know is of populist developments.
This puts populism above the indie groups.
This in turn makes fat cats rich.
Itunes does very well but it by no means represents indie groups fairly and no judge really complains.
Mp3.com represented the indie scene and it got crushed straight away.
It's a god driven war chant minipulating domesticated people in essence readying for war with the tao movement proclaiming freedom to all and giveing power to but a few.
Every time you'd be dancing Foxtrot, Swing, some other social dance you may be liable for a hefty royalty fee. Same for a dance troupe performing an established chorography from say Cats or West-Side Story.
What would happen to dance studios? What would happen to shows like Dancing With The Stars, or America Got Talent? What would happen to any local or international dance competition?
Yet the creators flourish despite the fact that a given Salsa move does not require anyone to pay royalites to the first person or couple ever to come up with it.
And now think of famous plays in the world of sports....
- All they have done is kill the search engines
- by Orion Blastar July 2, 2007 10:27 PM PDT
- for BitTorrent and the BT trackers are still online that actually send the bits of files back and forth over the Internet.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(21 Comments)For every BT search engine you take down, five more will take its place. It won't stop the pirates that already share files on BitTorrent, it will only slow them down.
Now if you really want to make a dent, hit the BT Trackers and take them down. Otherwise you are just whistling in the dark.
Most people pirate songs and movies and software because the prices are too high. Try lowering them sometime to combat piracy.
MPAA and RIAA and BSA the more you squeeze the file sharing community, the more it slips through your hands like water.