Comments on: Internet conduct that crosses the state line?
Internet attorney Eric J. Sinrod says an Illinois decision was an example of muscle-flexing that other states may decide to emulate.
Internet attorney Eric J. Sinrod says an Illinois decision was an example of muscle-flexing that other states may decide to emulate.
November 30, 2009 3:24 PM PST
November 30, 2009 3:08 PM PST
November 30, 2009 2:23 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Illinois is quite right to crack down on internet scammers, whether or not they happen to be a "loan company" or not. If you had to set up brick & mortar in order to offer "payday loan services" you'd clearly come under state jurisdiction.
The author seems to be an attorney retained to defend this sort of outrageous behavior and uphold the almighty scambuck without regard to common sense.
complex by wrapping it in the guise of "Internet".
Actual money changed hands. Harassing phone calls
were make. How did the lender expect to collect
without using Illinois courts? If the advertisement
of lending had been mailed, instead of posted on a
web page, would Illinois have jurisdiction? Certainly.
That's different than jacking someone on a loan and breaking most states laws on usury.
The only difference between a payday loan company and a loan shark is that the loan shark can't use the courts when someone doesn't pay up.
It will kill off the payday loan scams as well as the credit card scams that take advantage of people with bad credit by offering them credit cards at terrible rates. I did a little research on them and found offers of 25% interest, a $150 "set up fee", and a $100 dollar annual fee. All on cards with a typical limit of $300-$500. These fees seems to get charged on the card, and of course the victim is paying interest on the charges.
All this is set up to make the person stay in poverty, and usually ends up making them worse financially.
Yeah, the person who falls for this crap is also responsible, blah blah blah, but these companies are nothing more then con men. We don't excuse a con man who just pilfered all the money from an old lady because the lady is responsible for her actions. No, the scumbag is thrown in jail.
That is where people who run these scam businesses should be rotting.
Go into your local bank and try to borrow $100 or so without putting it on your credit card.
- What happened to Contract Law?
- by gr8bluemarble June 6, 2007 11:44 AM PDT
- Isn't it the law that a contract is under the jurisdiction of the state in which it was signed?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- technically
- by MSSlayer June 7, 2007 8:05 AM PDT
- Unless the loan company is completely stupid the loan actually took place on the server. The customers computer was used to generate the application and display the results.
- Like this
-
(12 Comments)In this case, it should be the state in which the consumer resides as they were on their computer at the time that the transaction occurred. Internet security uses IP addresses to track an individual to a physical location, in this case Illinois, and they are prosecute accordingly.
Most financial businesses are responsible to honor the laws of the state in which the transaction occurs hence the disclaimers on credit cards.
I say nail the scumbags and put them out of business. It's fraud and an average "Joe" would end up in prison for that type of behavior. Poverty should be treated as an illness instead of victimized by big business.
United States of America where only those with money can afford all their rights.