Comments on: Apple, others draw legal threat over media players
California company accuses Apple, Microsoft, Real and Adobe of violating copyright law by "actively avoiding" its products.
California company accuses Apple, Microsoft, Real and Adobe of violating copyright law by "actively avoiding" its products.
December 27, 2009 9:15 PM PST
December 27, 2009 7:45 PM PST
December 27, 2009 4:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
crap is going nowhere.
This has got to be the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. It makes SCO almost seem sane.
I can't believe anyone would stoop so low.
makes no sense to sue, especially in the US over another
companies desire NOT to use your product. None of the named
companies have any obligation, legal or otherwise to use their
product.
These days just having a business plan is enough for some to think that automatically entitles them to profit.
I almost wish they would sue. A judge would likely dismiss it in the first hearing, but if they get a retarded judge the combined financial might of these 4 companies could bankrupt this stupid greedy company.
There is no way they would settle and set a precedence for this sort of extortion.
I would be shocked if this went beyond a letter or two and a few words.
anyway, be sure to send them a "what the fck" email, or call them and LAUGH, and hang up. here is all their contact info:
http://www.mediarightstech.com/contact/
Anyone wants to chip in my legal expenses? If you contribute to 1%
of the expenses, you'll get 0.5% of the money awarded to me.
"...Supported by advanced mathematical skills and extensive business experience, he then designed the technical solutions that solve a very large industry problem."
Marketplace "solutions" are confidentialy PROVEN by the their effectivness at addressing and solving a client's problem. A development that's so low-profile and underwhelming it's developer has to resort to serving potential clients with underhanded legal threats to merely get their attention, is hardly a "solution."
Hank Risan's extension is 244. He's quoted in the story as saying stupid stuff.
Dial it using Skype, which is free to you, and leave them a message (or two).
by using this setup:
- any Mac
- Parallels Desktop or Microsoft Virtual PC
- Rogue Amoeba's Audio Hijack
Once you have BlueBeat.com's streams running on your windows
operating system, you can use MacOS X with Audio Hijack to
capture the sound and save it as .AIF file.
Sounds great!
1) requiring all sound software/hardware, from the media player, through the operating system, down to the speakers, to be locked down using some sort of encryption technology (as in, regular sound cards and speakers wouldn't work anymore). (I think I remember that Vista was previously planned to be like this, like during fall 2005.)
2) passing laws prohibiting the further manufacturing of analog-to-digital converters that don't incorporate DRM.
I am guessing that such attempted-to-be-general measures like these would be laughable as far as how effective they'd be...but in principle, I find the general idea to be quite scary and hope that our society won't ever reach a point like that.
Even my daughter who wanted to give a old iPod shuffle to a friend
was dissapointed that should could not share any of her music with
her because of DRM. You know I can remember when a good three
head cassette deck could make almost perfect copies! I did not any
complaints about that!
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/3935
No DRM technology will be 100% as there is no such thing as a 100% secure computer.
Some advice to MRT:
Instead of wasting money on stupid lawsuits that are SO creative to get into the blogosphere, try paying a high school kid to make your website look a little more professional. Right now, it's very 1998 over there. No wonder your products aren't being taken seriously.
This sort of kneejerk marketing should get you a knee to the face, shortly before closing your doors forever.
Contrary to Marketing Myth, there is such a thing as Bad Attention, especially when you're trying to force companies to use your product in a free market.
Good luck with that.
Does this upset anyone else? It's this kind of crap that really shows the slime on the fringes of our industry.
Some advice to MRT:
Instead of wasting money on stupid lawsuits that are SO creative to get into the blogosphere, try paying a high school kid to make your website look a little more professional. Right now, it's very 1998 over there. No wonder your products aren't being taken seriously.
This sort of kneejerk marketing should get you a knee to the face, shortly before closing your doors forever.
Contrary to Marketing Myth, there is such a thing as Bad Attention, especially when you're trying to force companies to use your product in a free market.
Good luck with that.
Does this upset anyone else? It's this kind of crap that really shows the slime on the fringes of our industry.
- hmmm
- by ccpopham May 14, 2007 7:49 PM PDT
- I think I read that law a couple of times and at no point did I see his companies name mentioned that all other companies had to use or should use. So does that mean that Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, etc can sue that company for being STUPID??? I think so. Wait I got it, I want to sue a car compny because they are not using the red keychain that I made!!! How dumb can some people be? That was a good joke, Haha!!!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (59 Comments)