Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!

Comments on: FTC shuts down four spam rings

In two cases, spammers sent sexually explicit e-mail messages using "zombie" computers, the agency says.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
$8,000 instead of jailtime?
by hadaso September 15, 2006 12:57 AM PDT
Paying $8000 as punishment for the crime of "using zombie PCs" (plus extras like not properly labeling spam) is a joke.

People that take over other people's computers, for whatever reason, should be put in jail. It has nothing to do with spam. Spam here is only the circumstantial evidence shown to convince the court that a crime was commited. There's no need for anti-spam laws to put people in jail for "using other people's computers without permision". Does law enforcement require that a crime be committed using a car that is "used without permision" of the owner? Does law enfoecement require that money taken "without permision" would be used for some illegal purpose or is it sufficient the "taking without permision" sufficient to put a person in jail?

There are plenty of reasons to put spammers in jail that don't require any kind of specific "anti-spam" laws. Spammers steal resources, break into computers and computer networks and use them without permision. Spammers steal people's and organizations identities to avoid having to deal with the consequences of their actions. All these are classifiable into "classical" crimes of fraud, breking an enrty, and others...

Spammers create a lot of damage that is forseeable and can be estimated. What the legal system perhaps needs is to learn how to cope with damages that are fragmented into minute pieces, and learn how to punish criminals that cause very little measurable damage to each individual that aggregates and becomes huge damage to a collective of individuals. No one will put a person in jail for stealing a dime from another person. But an employee of a bank caught stealing just 10 cents from each individual customer's account will face several years in jail, even though no single individual was really hurt. The same legal logic can apply to many crimes commited over computer networks, and the legal system should learn how to apply this logic, because criminals have already learned how to apply it to avoid punishment.
Reply to this comment
Should get jail time for breaking into other PC's
by Seaspray0 September 15, 2006 8:15 AM PDT
Creating zombie computers involves breaking into other PC's. That alone deserves jail time! He should be sentenced per PC he zombied.
Indeed..and judgement suspended?
by fourpastmidnight September 15, 2006 4:33 AM PDT
What's up with suspending the judgement because they can't pay? Who cares? Garnish their wages...everyone else who gets a judgement has to pay (technically), so why not them? That's like saying "Don't do that!!" and then going and doing that yourself right in front of them...did they learn their lesson? No. Was there a consequence to their actions? No. What are we telling spammers and would-be spammers? Very lame....
Reply to this comment
Perhaps...
by aabcdefghij987654321 September 15, 2006 6:42 AM PDT
Perhaps the Judge is saying that while it looks like there may be money in spamming these guys who can't even pay an $8,000 judgement against them are proof that the money either isn't there or it's drying up.

I see that as a positive indication but must agree that jail time should have been included. As for using zombie PCs that could come from a separate court case but I suspect there's a difference in catching a guy using zombies and gathering all the evidence needed to convict them. They probably just figured they could get them for the spamming and didn't bother to go to the extra work of gathering the evidence to convict them for the zombies.
So....
by Seaspray0 September 15, 2006 8:19 AM PDT
If a clerk robs the till and takes $20, gets caught and can't pay the $20, he doesn't have to go to jail?
Reply to this comment
Inability to pay?
by wbenton September 16, 2006 11:01 AM PDT
The inability to pay should only prolong their sentence in jail.

About $1.00 per day should do the trick of stopping SPAM at it's ankles... or more like... at it's toes!!!

Walt
Reply to this comment
Inability To Pay?
by Conster September 19, 2006 3:40 PM PDT
***? Since when does the "inability to pay" exempt a convicted criminal from paying up?
Why not sell his pc/equipment at auction?
That'd be a start, anyway. Conster
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement