Comments on: Police blotter: Husband spies on wife's computer
Legal documents filed in New Jersey divorce case say husband "wiretapped" his wife's computer. He's not the first.
Legal documents filed in New Jersey divorce case say husband "wiretapped" his wife's computer. He's not the first.
December 30, 2009 5:38 PM PST
December 30, 2009 4:57 PM PST
December 30, 2009 4:14 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
If there is a some evidence that one spouse is hiding certain things in a divorce(asests, actions that would prove fault) then access to those things can be gained through the discovery process.
- Bryan
What might an ?unspecified monitoring device? be? Is the ?device.? hardware, software or combination of both. Was the ?device? installed external or internal to the computer and/or telecommunication transmission lines, inside or outside the ?marital home??
Since Pat Act I & II gives the FBI, NSA, DHS, IRS, INS and assorted members of the Inside-The-Beltway Bureaucratic Brotherhood license to electronically snoop on and monitor everyone?s personal communications in pursuit of ?terrorists,? Mr. Garfinkel, Mrs. Garfinkel?s husband, should be free to do so as well.
The government says, ?Only those who have something to hide, should object to surreptitious electronic monitoring.? If Mrs. Garfinkel ?HAS NOTHING TO HIDE,? why would she care? Maybe Mr. Garfinkel, as a concerned husband, was only trying to track down the ?bio-terrorist? that infected Mrs. Garfinkel with the STDs that caused her ?emotional distress.?
This article has caused me to ponder this question. Does passage of the Patriot Act mean the sanctity and privacy of the top sock drawer in my armoire is no longer protected?
I love it! Thanks for a good laugh! :)
Well, they DID just sign into LAW that police no longer have to knock a warning before entering your house with a warrant!
So, NO, your top sock drawer in my armoire is no longer protected!
This discovering a cheat digitally is how we've to this messy Heather Locklear, Richie Sambora, Denise Richards triangle http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=50
truth is, we keep asking for more of it, even in the face of their
utter incompetence.
He spies on her, he violated her privacy, thus he has to pay.
But what about the cases of the past where SHE spies on HIM and the courts ruled that it was NOT a violation of HIS privacy since they lived in the same household?
Double-standards abound...
It's just another clear sign of bias in the system where Divorce is concerned: She is presumed innocent until you prove her guilty, but you are presumed guilty until you prove your innocence. And the system promotes that, and this story is a clear sign of it.
conclusions on many legal issues. You come across as a complete
loser by claiming this result turned on the genders of the parties.
adventures her husband was apparently hoping to discover by
spying.
- Wiretapping.
- by wbenton June 21, 2006 6:41 AM PDT
- When a program runs on a computer... the information collected on that computer occurs before it goes out onto the wire (LAN or modem).
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(29 Comments)That said... can this really be considered wire-tapping? Per the phone wiretapping rules, wiretapping is performed with a special physical device attached to the wire of a phone line.
Is capturing/loggin online information really considered wire tapping?
Walt