Version: 2008
  • On CBS.com: Prank Friends With Barney's HIMYM App

Comments on: MPAA accused of hiring a hacker

Lawsuit alleges the Motion Picture Association of America was trying to steal information from Torrentspy.com.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (33 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Well
by firstlast May 25, 2006 3:43 AM PDT
It started to happen quite often :)
--
Pixel image editor - http://www.kanzelsberger.com
Reply to this comment
Nothing they do suprises me...
by cidman2001 May 25, 2006 4:28 AM PDT
I'm so tired of the music/movie industry. They created the formats that they are now suing everyone for sharing. What about all the money they made when they were the only ones with the technology to make CD's and MP3's.. etc? They also created the betamax and vcr/vhs as well as audio cassette tapes and the harware to reproduce and record content. Now that they (most notably Sony) have gobbled up the content creators they want to sue everyone! They weren't complaining when they were making millions off the hardware they were selling. Now they want to sue Sirrius radio for making hardware that records radio broadcasts! According to the theory behind the Grokster ruling they could be sued by a whole slew of 70's and 80's artists that they "assisted consumers" in infringing on their copyrights... Where does it end? They opened their own pandora's box. Don't sue me to try and close it!
Reply to this comment
umm... no
by skeptik May 25, 2006 6:22 AM PDT
learn your history, get your facts straight, then try to post your views. I agree with your feeling, but you're wrong so many places in your assertions, that you end up sounding dumb.
The industry FOUGHT all those innovations, not created them.
View all 3 replies
Look at the Grokster ruling...
by cidman2001 May 25, 2006 12:37 PM PDT
Thanks for backing me up so eloquently...If you look at
the Grokster ruling and apply it to Sony and all these
other companies (specifically record companies). The
same arguments they used against Grokster would
apply. For years they held the technology rights and
distribution contracts that essentialy made it impossible
for an individual artist to promote their product. I am a
card carrying member of ASCAP and have been a
professional musician for 20+ years. I have no
sympathy for companies that could probably also be
prosecuted under RICOH statutes (racketeering) as
well. In the past I wouldn't have been able to be heard
because I wasn't "signed" .ie pay for distribution and
radio promotion, advertising etc... through a high
percentage of the profits from my own hard work. If
that's not a classic "protection" scheme, call me stupid.
I'm not bitter about not being "signed" or not becoming
famous. I'm just sick of the little guy getting screwed! Is
it too much to ask for a level playing field so the real
"cream" rises to the top. Think about how many artists
"suck" and then consider how they got to be on the
medium that you find them. My guess is they got
"signed" to what was probably a lopsided "deal". Hootie
and the Blowfish only made $60,000 dollars on
Cracked Rear View. Gee...I wonder who made the rest
of the millions? I wonder what other options they had at
the time they signed....some "deal".
View reply
Turn About is Fair Play and....
by Eskiegirl302 May 25, 2006 5:41 AM PDT
If the MPAA is found guilty of this, they get what they deserve.
Reply to this comment
SCREW the
by paulsecic May 25, 2006 11:01 AM PDT
MPAA & RIAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Turn About is Fair Play and....
by Eskiegirl302 May 25, 2006 5:44 AM PDT
If the MPAA is found guilty of this, then they get just what they deserve!
Reply to this comment
Not surprising. They certainly aren't above such tactics.
by unknown unknown May 25, 2006 4:33 PM PDT
I don't think the MPAA and RIAA (aka MAFIA) are known for being the most scrupulous bunch. Especially after supporting legislation a few years ago that would have allowed them hack fileshares computers and do damage with impunity. I remember hearing rumors the they where shopping around for a virus to infect fileshares with (I don't how true this is).
Reply to this comment
Yes it is true...
by cidman2001 May 26, 2006 7:55 AM PDT
Back in the era of the Kazaa lawsuits the RIAA and
some record companies explored releasing infected
"shares" to damage people's property as a way to
thwart filesharing. Fast forward to today..Sony's
"rootkit" approach is a similar approach that also
caused public outcry. The rootkits did nothing malicious
mind you, but they did alter your system at the core
level without your knowledge...thus making it a virus by
definition. I'll reiterate...they never learn!
We Don't Care How You Get It???
by BushidoVatISC May 26, 2006 7:18 AM PDT
"One MPAA executive is quoted in Torrentspy's lawsuit as saying: 'We don't care how you get it,' referring to the alleged assignment to dig up information on Torrentspy."

Then fine, using your own legal reasoning, you shouldn't care where we get our files from, pirated or otherwise. Yes, pirating is illegal, but so is hacking, so who are you guys to say that we are doing something wrong and play it off like you guys are saints, when you too are breaking the law? Yes, I understand pirating is bad, I'm just saying they ain't no saints and therefor shouldn't be making these alligations as if they were such.
Reply to this comment
Hacking Is Illegal?
by RustInPeace August 6, 2006 8:42 PM PDT
If when you say hacking you mean "cracking", the act of breaking into a system without authorization, than I agree... Hacking on the other hand is the act of Innovating, esp. in the computer world. Hackers write programs and solve problems, while crackers break trust and create problems.
So they've finally been caught...
by PCCRomeo May 26, 2006 5:32 PM PDT
I'm sure this isn't even the worst thing they've done all year. Just like the music companies, if better movies were made maybe people would be more apt to pay $20 for them...
Reply to this comment
One of the oldest story's in the book
by heystoopid May 26, 2006 10:12 PM PDT
One of the oldest story's in the book, learn about thine enemy, study thine weaknesses, and then proceed to kick him up up the backside, literally and figuratively, all basic legal 101 really!

By using extended third parties, you can apply the "I didn't do it , so don't blame me, it was the other guy!" Karl Rove Defence!

You expect MPAA, to play by the rules, when they can cheat at arm's length do you?

For after all the failed ENRON top exec's tried and failed recently, but it will be at least another 2 years or so before they finally get jailed or scam a new trial? with funds that were stolen from both the shareholders and the staff pension fund! But then ,our dear and near, mostly unloved corrupt ruling politician's do it to the voting public on a daily basis!

Oh well pay for what you get and get what you pay for!
Reply to this comment
by gregpetersen March 6, 2009 1:47 PM PST
I heard that <a href="http://sewelldirect.com/Gefen-Wireless-HDMI-Extender.asp">wireless hdmi</a> is hack proof. Just because it is wireless, doesn't mean you can hack it!
Reply to this comment
(33 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement