Comments on: Police blotter: 911 dispatcher misuses database, kills ex-girlfriend
An emergency call center worker in Pennsylvania misuses government database before murdering his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend.
An emergency call center worker in Pennsylvania misuses government database before murdering his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend.
January 8, 2010 5:49 AM PST
January 8, 2010 4:00 AM PST
January 8, 2010 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
common as secret government surveillance spreads
and little concern is given to oversight.
My point was, am I the only one that is OUTRAGED by this story. It's insane that a 911 dispatcher atter being caught using information to stalk his ex-girlfriend & her new boyfriend, was allowed to return to work and contine to do so. After his suspention he enlisted 2 of his coworkers to help and the gladly assisted him. When the supervisor did finally fire him he made a half hearted attemt to warn the exgirlfriend and contacted the wrong law enforment agengy. He didn't even warn the boy.
Then when the disturbud 911 dispatcher made a call to the center and threatened to make the ex-girlfriend & new boyfriend pay on the day her was fired only hour later. Nothing was done. noone was called. Now 2 people are dead, and thier death could have been prevented. That should Outrage everyone. For me outrage is just the tip of the iceburg. I hope this mother win somthing in her suit and maybe someone will wakeup, at least in that company!
I knwq thiw would happen
The Supreme Court, for over 50 years, has made it VERY clear that unless the agent of the government, under the color of that employment, commits the act, then the government is not liable. Furthermore, if the government could not have known the act would be committed based on no previous evidence of violence, such as in a case of a police use of force lawsuit, then the agency cannot be sued. In other words, this case only gets into Federal court, if the dispatch supervisor was on duty, ignored a call from a citizen within his jurisdiction for which he was responsible for sending police in a timely manner, and ONLY because of that failure, someone died. In this case, the citizen that called was the suspect, and the dispatch supervisor had more than satisfied the duty to act under the law by telling the eventual victim that her ex was being fired for having been looking her up in the databases to try and find her. Finally, if on the original deferred suspension, the agency acted in good faith, under well-tested employment rules, they cannot be held liable for his continued misuse, since they did act on that once it was discovered by firing him. This situation may have involved a union contract, as is likely the case in the northeast...Pennsylvania is one of the most unionized law-enforcement states in the USA, and the 1 week deferred suspension may have been mandatory under that contract.
However, the agency made some small errors here, and there might yet be money paid to the family. While those mistakes, as the court said, do not rise to the level of a Federal lawsuit, State law may be less kind to a governmental agency. The lawsuit under Federal law was made for one purpose, to get more money. There are no caps on the amounts that can be paid to a winner in a federal civil rights lawsuit, and the loser pays the legal bills on top of the judgment. If Pennsylvania has any tort-reform caps in place, each side could possibly be required to cover their own legal bills, and there might be a maximum dollar amount that can be won, even including legal fees.
A final point, and one you might want to consider before slamming the government agency in this case and others. Every time someone wins one of these lawsuits, it makes the business of government more expensive for all of us, even in different states. Insurance for the local governments goes up, training costs go up, and staying within the bounds of employee-rights laws while preventing cases such as these requires more lawyers than ever...and we all know how expensive those are. Where does all that money come from? Yep, from local sales and property taxes. If you like more taxes, keep on encouraging people to sue your governmental agencies. Just don't complain when they foreclose on YOUR house when you don't pay your taxes.
- We are all screwed!
- by casper2004 May 20, 2006 8:33 AM PDT
- Bush has declared open season on our private lives. All the screening in the world isn't going to stop an employee with a vendetta.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(7 Comments)