Version: 2008

Comments on: Judge: Worker can't be fired for Web surfing

Administrative law judge rules that New York City worker can not be fired for surfing the Web from work.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Thanks CNET
by The_Nirvana April 24, 2006 3:36 PM PDT
that's heartening news for all of us who troll your forums and kill half of our work day ;-).
Reply to this comment
I stand corrected
by The_Nirvana April 24, 2006 3:45 PM PDT
After looking at the commnets for "Apple debuts 17-inch MacBook Pro"artile (88 comments when I last looked)I realized most of your readers don't have any real jobs :-).
View reply
Government parasites
by nicmart April 24, 2006 5:05 PM PDT
How pitiful is this country with a protected class of government
workers who can't be fired? There are producers and there are
parasites, and the latter group grows bigger every day.
Reply to this comment
the private sector is worse
by fredtsui April 25, 2006 9:33 AM PDT
Talk to any big corporation employee and they can tell you stories of waste and laziness that beats any government.

All the judge is saying that workers can't be fired for doing things that do not get in the way of their work. Did you read the part that the reason he was "fired" for surfing the internet was in retaliation for the worker filing discrimination charges against his employers.
i'll have to print and save this...
by scottinsteven April 25, 2006 12:15 AM PDT
several months ago i was written up for surfing the web at work and told if i used the internet without permission from the owner of the company that i'd be fired. that would be fine with me but for one thing, i was the only person given this write-up. i work for a small company and the other employees come in and sometimes as soon as they get there log on and one guy opens 4-8 different chat lines at once and another guy checks out all of the personals sites. i say if the rule applies to me it should apply to all and if i do lose my job i'll take it to court. it doesn't keep me from doing my job and i use the internet for my job at times when i can't even get in touch to get permission. i think i'm being singled out and maybe this judges ruling will help me out sometime down the road!
Reply to this comment
The decline of Western productivity
by KsprayDad April 25, 2006 5:43 AM PDT
....

this result is one more reason that the West is getting its collective @ss handed to it economically.
Reply to this comment
"playing on the Internet" yeah whatever
by tipper_gore April 25, 2006 7:01 AM PDT
When I'm multitasking at work I'll often be, amongst other
things, be checking out stuff like Ars Technica or Slashdot or
even (I'll admit it) the Jerry Springer stuff like news.zdnet.com
while doing other things, and I consider this time well spent, in
fact my employers should be down on bended knee thanking me
for taking an active interest in my work, and truth be told they
usually are (metaphorically speaking, of course). And yes I do
work alongside a few people who would likely gossip about how
that constitutes "playing on the Internet" and "wasting time at
work." But they're typically people with lifetime employment (e.g.
union) who don't have to keep up with technology (e.g. union),
who maybe have literacy issues (nothing against people with
literacy issues), who don't have to learn one more thing until the
day they retire in order to keep their jobs and keep their annual
incremental salary increases. Of course I don't encourage people
to spend half the work day fracking around on eBay, playing
online games, etc., but one gets lumped in with the other.
Reply to this comment
I think that Judge ought to be thrown off the bench!
by casper2004 April 25, 2006 7:39 AM PDT
I feel that businesses should be able to not put up with employees surfing the web on their computers, and if they want to single out people for doing so, it should also be their right. You see, if we don't like it, we don't have to work there. Of course, those that think a company should be required to let employees surf, should buy their own business and find out how terrible it is to own something just to have someone else run it.
Reply to this comment
No Work
by Draylynn May 31, 2006 4:09 AM PDT
If there's "no work" there's "no work", what are people expected to do all day if there's nothing to do? Sit with their thumbs up their *****?
What a Surprise
by MrHandle April 25, 2006 4:21 PM PDT
The government just loves to waste our tax dollars.
Reply to this comment
IT
by telestarnext April 26, 2006 8:41 AM PDT
Hmm, Sounds like the IT didn't properly implement the KILL FILTER for this user, of course, they probably did not at management's request so they could fire him. How hard is it to alter a user's permissions?
Reply to this comment
go judge!
by alek_nedic May 1, 2006 10:43 AM PDT
http://www.analogstereo.com/cadillac_fleetwood_owners_manual.htm
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement