Comments on: Police blotter: Wells Fargo not required to encrypt data
Bank wins ruling in suit claiming its contractor should have encrypted customer data on computers that were stolen.
Bank wins ruling in suit claiming its contractor should have encrypted customer data on computers that were stolen.
January 5, 2010 11:45 AM PST
January 5, 2010 11:42 AM PST
January 5, 2010 11:37 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Otherwise this could appear to be slander, unfounded hoax information.
MV Me
C-level decision makers deserve stiff fines and/or incarceration if they continue business as normal. Leaders must realize that their firm?s serious deficiencies will not be solved at the same levels and mindsets in which they were created.
It?s time to allow new technologies to cut costs and risks. Management should start taking initial steps to learn, explore and evaluate new ?user access? and ?data protection? technologies so they stop violating ?trusting? customers and shareholders.
Story after story will continue about computers being lost, stolen, and/or discarded with private customer information. Shockingly, with courts ?snubbing? unprotected customers because plaintiffs couldn?t produce actual financial losses is understandable ? but didn?t we learn from the hundreds of overlooked foreseeable security warning before 9.11?
Otherwise this could appear to be slander, unfounded hoax information.
MV Me
C-level decision makers deserve stiff fines and/or incarceration if they continue business as normal. Leaders must realize that their firm?s serious deficiencies will not be solved at the same levels and mindsets in which they were created.
It?s time to allow new technologies to cut costs and risks. Management should start taking initial steps to learn, explore and evaluate new ?user access? and ?data protection? technologies so they stop violating ?trusting? customers and shareholders.
Story after story will continue about computers being lost, stolen, and/or discarded with private customer information. Shockingly, with courts ?snubbing? unprotected customers because plaintiffs couldn?t produce actual financial losses is understandable ? but didn?t we learn from the hundreds of overlooked foreseeable security warning before 9.11?
This is how a judge throws a case in favor of Goliath. Any claims for mental pain, suffering, distress, etc., are always anticipatory--except, apparently, when one of your local chamber of commerce giants is the irresponsible party.
This is how a judge throws a case in favor of Goliath. Any claims for mental pain, suffering, distress, etc., are always anticipatory--except, apparently, when one of your local chamber of commerce giants is the irresponsible party.
C-level decision makers deserve stiff fines and/or incarceration if they continue business as normal. Leaders must realize that their firm?s serious deficiencies will not be solved at the same levels and mindsets in which they were created.
It?s time to allow new technologies to cut costs and risks. Management should start taking initial steps to learn, explore and evaluate new ?user access? and ?data protection? technologies so they stop violating ?trusting? customers and shareholders.
Story after story will continue about computers being lost, stolen, and/or discarded with private customer information. Shockingly, with courts ?snubbing? unprotected customers because plaintiffs couldn?t produce actual financial losses is understandable ? but didn?t we learn from the hundreds of overlooked foreseeable security warning before 9.11?
C-level decision makers deserve stiff fines and/or incarceration if they continue business as normal. Leaders must realize that their firm?s serious deficiencies will not be solved at the same levels and mindsets in which they were created.
It?s time to allow new technologies to cut costs and risks. Management should start taking initial steps to learn, explore and evaluate new ?user access? and ?data protection? technologies so they stop violating ?trusting? customers and shareholders.
Story after story will continue about computers being lost, stolen, and/or discarded with private customer information. Shockingly, with courts ?snubbing? unprotected customers because plaintiffs couldn?t produce actual financial losses is understandable ? but didn?t we learn from the hundreds of overlooked foreseeable security warning before 9.11?