Comments on: Google wins copycat Web domain dispute

Internet arbitrator says search giant has rights to Googkle.com, Ghoogle.com, Gfoogle.com and Gooigle.com.

[TMB333]

I'm Confused??

"Further, the arbitrator found that Gridasov was using them in bad faith by presumably profiting from the use of domains"

Umm, isn't that a legitimate business purpose for obtaining a domain name? To reap profits??

Understandably, the methods he was using may be questionable,

"..direct Internet users to Web sites that attempt to download viruses, Trojan horses and spyware to the users' computers.."

but the one paragraph makes it sound like profiting from a domain name is a bad thing.

[ip_fresh]

obtaining a domain name

"Further, the arbitrator found that Gridasov was using them in bad faith by presumably profiting from the use of domains"

Umm, isn't that a legitimate business purpose for obtaining a domain name? To reap profits??

davison
http://www.accident-injury-compensation.co.uk/

[ip_fresh]

profiting from the use of domains

Previous Next Further, the arbitrator found that Gridasov was using them in bad faith by presumably profiting from the use of domains.

davison
http://www.best-loans-mortgage.com
http://www.my-mortgage-loans.com