Comments on: Burst, Microsoft agree to settle suit
Fight over alleged streaming-media technology theft draws to tentative close.
Fight over alleged streaming-media technology theft draws to tentative close.
November 27, 2009 4:27 PM PST
November 27, 2009 1:05 PM PST
November 27, 2009 11:52 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
After all, if they were truly fighting for the rights of all or for IP, then they would keep their greedy hands to themselves and stop stealing other's IP.
- Insider comment on Burst
- by March 16, 2005 2:45 PM PST
- I worked at Burst and know the patents and the technology very well. I really dislike Microsoft in general.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)However - this settlement is a joke.
The sad truth is, Burst doesn't really have this amazing technology at all. Burst's technology and patent - faster than realtime streaming - doesn't really fullfill important requirements to file a patent. A new invention applying for a patent has to be I) not obvious for somebody in the field and II) be a novelty (similar stuff has not been published before). I know Burst's patents really well, they should be dismissed on both grounds.
Bursts patents are really a joke.
For some strategical reason Microsoft decided to settle - who know for what reason.
Mr. Lang - the founder of Burst - sits now on a huge chunk of money. He got the cash because he was smart in sueing, it had nothing to do with technology.
I really don't like the way Microsoft acts and does Business, I really dislike their products.
But seeing Burst/Mr. Lang getting lucky with Microsoft, that really makes me angry (if you how Mr. Lang ran his business during glory days).