Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Burst, Microsoft agree to settle suit

Fight over alleged streaming-media technology theft draws to tentative close.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Software patents at their best...
by sunergeos March 12, 2005 9:09 PM PST
So, here we see why MS has been fighting so hard in the EU to get software patents laws passed. Large companies like MS can afford the court cases. That's it in a nutshell. If you want to protect your IP from MS then you'll have to have enough in the bank for a three year court battle against a company with billions at its disposal. After three years you will be willing to settle for less than what you originally asked for because you don't have the cash to keep fighting. The end result is that MS settles the case with a huge discount on the IP they stole to begin with.

After all, if they were truly fighting for the rights of all or for IP, then they would keep their greedy hands to themselves and stop stealing other's IP.
Reply to this comment
And you think this is the start?
by Andrew J Glina March 13, 2005 8:05 PM PST
Apple is probably next on the list, followed by Real.
View reply
Insider comment on Burst
by March 16, 2005 2:45 PM PST
I worked at Burst and know the patents and the technology very well. I really dislike Microsoft in general.
However - this settlement is a joke.
The sad truth is, Burst doesn't really have this amazing technology at all. Burst's technology and patent - faster than realtime streaming - doesn't really fullfill important requirements to file a patent. A new invention applying for a patent has to be I) not obvious for somebody in the field and II) be a novelty (similar stuff has not been published before). I know Burst's patents really well, they should be dismissed on both grounds.
Bursts patents are really a joke.
For some strategical reason Microsoft decided to settle - who know for what reason.
Mr. Lang - the founder of Burst - sits now on a huge chunk of money. He got the cash because he was smart in sueing, it had nothing to do with technology.
I really don't like the way Microsoft acts and does Business, I really dislike their products.
But seeing Burst/Mr. Lang getting lucky with Microsoft, that really makes me angry (if you how Mr. Lang ran his business during glory days).
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement