Comments on: How search engines rate on privacy

News.com asks Google, Yahoo and others to fess up on what they do to protect their users' personal information.
In their own words: Search engines on privacy

[Catgic]

There Are More Search Sites Than Just Five

How about ixquick.com, mooter.com...and more.

The article is a good start, but the list needs more work.

[crazynexus]

He said why..

He said that he only targeted the top 5 search engines, and he did mention a few others. Seeing as how the top 5 probably account for about 80-90% of all searches, I think that's a fairly good amount of coverage.

[SearchWatch]

The best privacy search engine available today is Yauba.com

Their privacy policy is one of the best I have ever seen:

Yauba's Privacy Policy:

Yauba's Internet privacy policy comes with no fine print, no footnotes, no caveats, no ifs, no ands, and no buts.

The entirety of our privacy policy is as follows.

We do not keep any personally identifiable information.

Period.

------------------------------------

Our Commitment to Our Users:

We offer our users the highest privacy protection of any major search engine in the world. We are the only major search engine company that offers users the option of an anonymous browsing mode, which when used properly, allows users to both search and browse third party websites safely and anonymously, without passing on any private, personally identifiable information.

We actively support and endorse the work of leading Internet privacy advocacy organisations. We are the only Internet search focused company globally (and the first media company based in India) to be approved as an official signatory to the United Nations Global Compact, the leading non governmental initiative sponsored by the United Nations which promotes social responsibility standards for corporations around the world. We actively support and work with Stanford University's Center for Internet and Society on efforts to promote greater Internet privacy standards online. We also sponsor not for profit educational programmes for schools and parents on Internet safety and security.

We firmly believe we have an important moral obligation to safeguard the privacy and security of our users. As a result, we do not request any personal information from you; we do not use any cookies whatsoever; and we delete all of your personally identifiable information from our servers on a daily basis.

[minoal]

Interseting wording!

The terms "bureaucrats" is used to qualify the European Unions representatives trying to protect what is left of our private life against invasion from US companies.
Same issue about the US Government willing to impose a visa (electronic and most likely an other steal of private information) to European visitors. I strongly support the emerging initiative to immediately require a visa form our US friends if such a measure is taken. I do not question "free trade" and competition up to the point where it is used to control my privacy. Not because I have something to hide, but because it is probably the last piece of freedom I(we) have!

[grillin_man]

Best in privacy because of vaporware?

Ask is perceived to be the best protector of privacy...because of the "upcoming launch of AskEraser"? Notice all of Ask's answers are future-tense - the rest talked about what they are actually doing today.

Not several months (maybe) from now.

Why not go back and clarify what ASK is actually, really doing today for the people who use their website.

[wmorriss]

But What About Protecting Privacy?

While I thought the article provided interesting information on how search engines use data, I think that the rankings could have been improved by taking into account how protective the companies are of the data they do collect. For example, Google actually resisted subpoenas when the government came calling for information on user searches. Though that doesn't make Google a perfect company, I'd think it should give it a bump in the privacy rankings.

A more extended response to the article, along with links to relevant EFF press releases can be found at: http://ephemerallaw.blogspot.com/2007/08/search-engines-and-privacy.html

[marileev]

Posting Profiles w/out Permisson - ZoomInfo

While some SEs have the cojones to step up and NOT turn over a person's searches, there's another category of spyders aggregating your information in a so-called "directory" or pseudo business networking site.

About a week and a half ago I discovered that I was listed multiple times an a terrible directory called "ZoomInfo." Their spyders went so far as to take info from an old cached jazz cafe's website that I designed in college (it no longer exists). I wanted referrals to do work in college, so I put my univ. email address there -- durr I know better now.

ZoomInfo generated a name specific page for me and posted my college email address without my permission. Customer service told me "All of ZoomInfo's information comes from corporate websites, press releases, SEC filings, and other public websites."

Okay, the public website that I did have info posted on was permission I specifically gave one website NOT named ZoomInfo.

Has anyone else come across this?

[sangiest]

privacy & the web analytics companies

info gathered--and maintained nearly forever--by web analytics
companies (Omniture, Web Trends, Google analytics) can be
more invasive than search engine data. Omniture, for example,
gathers and hosts tracking info on most of the leading e-
commerce site, news sites, banking sites, travel sites, etc.
Beyond tracking your searches, they have your credit card info,
passwords, shopping preferances, and news interests stored--
and cross referenced--indefinitley on their servers. Web
analytics is a much larger threat to internet privacy than search
engines. My recommendation? give up a little convenience and
DISABLE COOKIES!

[wone111]

awsome article... Thanks!

wish ask.com had email...

[benjmn]

Data protection Spanish authority

Data, privacy and web search engines.



THE WEB SEARCH ENGINES HAS
RESPONSABILITIES. THE SPANISH AGENCY
OF DATA PROTECTION SET UP
INTERNATIONAL POSITIONS.



The Spanish Agency of Data Protection
(AGPD) has done a report and a public
communication in which keeps an coherent
attitude according to the topic and the National
and International repercussions.



The press note and the report can be found in
this website: (https//www.agpd.es/index.php)



Then, as publishers are responsible for the
content in accordance with the laws that
regulates Internet and data protection, so
searches are.



Among the conclusions of the report, it should
be mentioned the seventh one that says
literally: ?It?s necessary to limit the use and the
preservations of the personal data? and the
number eight says: ?searching services must
respect the rights that people have to cancel
the data that some links show the public in
websites?. It means, every single or juridical
person can be against that his data are
indexed-link and are showed everybody.?



The report marks there is not a uniform policy
about privacy in web search engine. It is not
enough to protect personal information and it
should be more responsible and respectful.
The report says that some clear informative
mechanisms should be developed in order to
let the users know which use will be done to
their data.



Before now, web search engines have been
defending their no responsibility National and
Internationally under the fact that they only
search and give back on line information,
being the publishers responsible for that.



The point of view of The Agencia Española de
Protección de Datos opens a debate between
the two rights, trying to get equilibrium:
freedom of expression and privacy rights, both
of them included in the Universal Human
Rights Conventions.



Without no doubts, this scheme is the same
as the ones that are in the other countries
and, it will bring national and international
consequences, that will affect the laws about
data protection, new technologies, internet,
honour, intimacy and image protection.
Moreover, there could be criminal
consequences as well as changes of way of
the web search engine work, its algorism, its
index/links systems, and its development
policy.





Benjamin Nicolau

Ebame, lawyers, abogados

www.ebame.com <http://www.ebame.com/>

Lawyers, abogados.