Comments on: How do you really feel about e-snooping?

A study suggests that the American public is of two minds when it comes to privacy, attorney Eric J. Sinrod finds.

[emeraldgate]

privacy

The whole argument that the U.S. government is interested in doing surveillence of internet and other forms of communications to protect the people is bogus. What they are interested in doing is protecting their control of the means of communication to further their agenda of One World Government. They have absolutely no respect for the privacy or safety of the people whatsoever. The governments of North America are involved in the most horrific human rights abuses in history. Daily they allow the drugging and raping (with animals) of thousands of women who the porno pimps then sell on the internet. The internet is the modern day auction block for slavery. Sex slavery. The use of rohypnol to chemically kidnap the victims is widely known. When people look at these horrific websites they think that the women are willing because they appear lucid. They are not. Rohynol anaesthetizes the frontal lobe of the brain and leaves the rest of the brain functioning. It was the CIA and their rescued Nazi 'doctors' who developed this crap in the l950's. (Check out the MKUltra experiments) The police forces, criminal justice system, all government agencies the hospitals etc. are themselves participating in these attrocities. They are making a fortune off of it. The internet companies serve the victims up. They are the ones who have made available the means by which these monsters are making a fortune off of the unknowing, unwilling victims.

Google hosts over 3 million of these sites, many of which openly declare that they are rape sites. If the government, or Google or anyone in the Justice system had any kind of integrity or morality they would stop this crap. The criminals always site the 4th Amendment as their defence, since when does the 4th Amendment justify the savagery portrayed on the beastiality websites. Since when does the 4th Amendment supercede the rights of individuals to control their own brain and bodies. What about the constitutional rights of the victims? What about their rights to safety and privacy?

Dianne Robinson

[computertech195]

privacy

Well. first Diane, if you look back in history, you see a great deal of war, rape and pillage. We are at war, we are being raped and pillaged by the very government that is so-called governing us. So to make a long story short, we are in deep caca if we don't take a stand for whats right. Our human rights, let alone our constitutional rights are a thing of the past, and what we have now is a complete police state and martial law. There wasn't much thought about the ramifcations of the Patriot Act when we didn't bother to really pay close attention to the attack on U.S soil, did we? If we are so conscious now, what happened back then? Surely, we could have avoided a major portion of the damage done.

[emeraldgate]

privacy

The whole argument that the U.S. government is interested in doing surveillence of internet and other forms of communications to protect the people is bogus. What they are interested in doing is protecting their control of the means of communication to further their agenda of One World Government. They have absolutely no respect for the privacy or safety of the people whatsoever. The governments of North America are involved in the most horrific human rights abuses in history. Daily they allow the drugging and raping (with animals) of thousands of women who the porno pimps then sell on the internet. The internet is the modern day auction block for slavery. Sex slavery. The use of rohypnol to chemically kidnap the victims is widely known. When people look at these horrific websites they think that the women are willing because they appear lucid. They are not. Rohynol anaesthetizes the frontal lobe of the brain and leaves the rest of the brain functioning. It was the CIA and their rescued Nazi 'doctors' who developed this crap in the l950's. (Check out the MKUltra experiments) The police forces, criminal justice system, all government agencies the hospitals etc. are themselves participating in these attrocities. They are making a fortune off of it. The internet companies serve the victims up. They are the ones who have made available the means by which these monsters are making a fortune off of the unknowing, unwilling victims.

Google hosts over 3 million of these sites, many of which openly declare that they are rape sites. If the government, or Google or anyone in the Justice system had any kind of integrity or morality they would stop this crap. The criminals always site the 4th Amendment as their defence, since when does the 4th Amendment justify the savagery portrayed on the beastiality websites. Since when does the 4th Amendment supercede the rights of individuals to control their own brain and bodies. What about the constitutional rights of the victims? What about their rights to safety and privacy?

Dianne Robinson

[computertech195]

privacy

Well. first Diane, if you look back in history, you see a great deal of war, rape and pillage. We are at war, we are being raped and pillaged by the very government that is so-called governing us. So to make a long story short, we are in deep caca if we don't take a stand for whats right. Our human rights, let alone our constitutional rights are a thing of the past, and what we have now is a complete police state and martial law. There wasn't much thought about the ramifcations of the Patriot Act when we didn't bother to really pay close attention to the attack on U.S soil, did we? If we are so conscious now, what happened back then? Surely, we could have avoided a major portion of the damage done.

[Hobyx]

it looks like people 'adapt' then

Well, from this survey data, it appears that people:

1. are against forms of surveillance that they see as new and

2. have come to accept forms that they're used to.. and likely
feel powerless to reverse.

This is a bad sign.. It means that whatever form of oppression
(in this case, privacy invasion) people of 'authority' put into
practice, people will eventually adjust to.. and even grow to
prefer, which is sick and wrong.

People of the world! Don't put up with this! Abuses of authority
won't stop unless people object to them! They'll only get worse
if you stay silent and 'adapt'!

[Hobyx]

it looks like people 'adapt' then

Well, from this survey data, it appears that people:

1. are against forms of surveillance that they see as new and

2. have come to accept forms that they're used to.. and likely
feel powerless to reverse.

This is a bad sign.. It means that whatever form of oppression
(in this case, privacy invasion) people of 'authority' put into
practice, people will eventually adjust to.. and even grow to
prefer, which is sick and wrong.

People of the world! Don't put up with this! Abuses of authority
won't stop unless people object to them! They'll only get worse
if you stay silent and 'adapt'!