Comments on: Flaw found in Firefox

Hole found in popular open-source browser could release sensitive information stored in memory.

[xpgeek11]

already fixed, soon

Firefox 1.03 coming out within days, this already fixed.

Running an Aviary of 1.03 right now.

[catchall]

That is just wrong...

It may soon be fixed. It may be fixed, but the solution is not available for general download. They may fix it soon.
Please pick the one you like.

[201293546946733175101343322673]

"Already fixed, soon"?

Oh please, just because you want to defend your favorite browser, you still need to study your grammer and write properly, right? :)

[feranick]

The release candidate of version 1.0.3...

... can be found here:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/007896.html

It's not yet final, but if you are really worried about this flaw, you can get this version.

[pcLoadLetter]

This is news

When a IE/XP flaw is found, that just means it is a new day.

When a FF flaw is found it is news as it is a faily uncommon event. Of course. they have a release candidate up and running. While Microsoft would be waiting until the next patch cycle, at the minimum.

Sure, it would have been better if this flaw did not exist, but no one can claim that Mozilla is not pro-active and quickly react to any problems.

[Andrew J Glina]

I'm confused

By your angle since Microsoft flaws are so common then they are not news worthy. It seems to me you are making a case for Firefox flaws to reciveve greater attention.

Eitherway, it is news. Microsoft is attacked for flaws in Win98, so it is fair that Firefox is attacked for flaws in their current "stable" version.

(Incidently I use Firefox... at the moment. I find the whole "one tab is busy they all are" feature/flaw annoying.)

Firefox Flaw

Wow. More people are using it, and flaws are starting to appear. What a concept.

[David Arbogast]

Huh...

Huh... isn't that odd...?

;)

[System Tyrant]

Flawed Perseption

I find it amusing that we all have resorted to pointing out flaws in software. Mozilla never said their wouldn't be flaws. I don't think Microsoft said anything like that either. Flaws are an inevitable part of anything. I think many have made that point over and over again.

I am amazed at the sides people take. It doesn't really have to do with the quality of software it's more about who is right and who is wrong.

It's true that the more people using a peice of software (firefox in this case) the more flaws are going to be found. The real issue is how bad are they, how fast do they get fixed, and how is the fix implemented. I will be honest with you, I don't like redownloading the entire program to fix a flaw. In my opinion it's like rereading the dictionary to find a single word. With the software it maybe the best bet, but it's still annoying. On the other hand I find that I like firefox better than other browsers and so I make a compremise on how it's patched.