Comments on: Finding a replacement for passwords
Verification gadgets range from tokens to cell-phone-based systems, but cost keeps them from catching on.![]()
Photo: In an antiphishing huddle
Verification gadgets range from tokens to cell-phone-based systems, but cost keeps them from catching on.![]()
Photo: In an antiphishing huddle
November 30, 2009 11:14 AM PST
November 30, 2009 11:08 AM PST
November 30, 2009 10:22 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Guess again. You must know that certain cars use something similar for ignigiion - and guess what:
the new electronic keys (or tokens) can be stolen, or duplicated. there is a fine balance between security via passwords, and (the next step in invading our privacy) tagging everyone with a chip. Is that to be your next suggestion, when the token do not work? Proper programing, that will not accept "easy to guess" passwords, is still the most "livable" way to go - along with ogther good policing/security measures. The limits of other means of programming and electonic based means have not even been scratched. Those in the related (secutity)fields (internet, ect.) have yet to make the effort to control spam and viruses that could be done. Where I work, we get in excess of 50,000 spam emails a day, and while thiose in charge of Internet security excuses themselves by saying that they cannot trace the originator, it does not even enter their mind, to go after those who pay the spamers to send out the adds. that is only an example of a related kind of problem. It seem that it is easier to creat another, money making gadget(?)??????
....that's my take on this
...Steve
A citizen could insert their "ID" every time they 'booted' their "...Trusted PC" (in fact, within the "Trusted Computer" architecture it could quickly be made virtually impossible to use a PC without it).
And best of all, by requiring "positive ID" to use the Internet, "WE" could, finally, eliminate "fraud", "copyright-violation", "anonymous speech", etc., ...or even, that most dreaded malady, "privacy" itself.
A token is nothing like the key fobs used in a car ignition system. Think of a token as a secure secret. Instead of sharing the secret to gain access (like you do now with a password, social security number, etc.) the token uses an embedded secret (the algorithm) to generate a one-time code based on time of day or an internal counter. The only way to confirm that this one-time code is correct is to have an encrypted copy of the secret on the back-end of the system being accessed. The secret on the back-end also generates a one-time code which is compared to the code the user enters. If the codes match, the correct token is being used and access is granted. At no time is the actual secret in the open. Many of today's algorithms use 3DES - you can look it up if you are interested in cryptography but bottom line is that it has not been cracked and would not be economically feasible to try.
- Password imperfect
- by February 23, 2005 9:11 PM PST
- Passwords are no longer the hard codes to break.What maximum a normal guy can set as password?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(7 Comments)1.His name/Nickname+123
2.His wifes name/Nickname+ilu
3.His pet's name
4.His son's or daughter's name
5.His birthdate
6.His wife;s birthdate
7.His anniversary date
8.His car number
9.His initials and emplyee number
10.His aniiversary
11..the list is long but definitley predictable
Hence even if you change your password everyday..one day or the other ..it will be hacked