Comments on: FAQ: How will Real ID affect you?
What are the privacy implications? What happens next? News.com tries to clear up some of the confusion surrounding the controversial law.
What are the privacy implications? What happens next? News.com tries to clear up some of the confusion surrounding the controversial law.
November 24, 2009 11:08 PM PST
November 24, 2009 10:42 PM PST
November 24, 2009 2:59 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
that a "Real ID" is a more trustworthy form of identification. Of
course, it's marginally more difficult to forge, but hardly
impossible. And, of course, one can produce forged credentials
to obtain one.
So, increased trust without commensurate increase in resistance
to falsification yields increased risk. If people start thinking that
"Real ID" is somehow superior to what existed before, then it
becomes a liability. This has the potential not only for
compromising security at airports and federal buildings, but also
in exacerbating identity theft.
With the false presumption of "Real ID" as definitive
identification, businesses and government will issue lines of
credit and apply reduced security measures to holders of the
card.
Also, I'd point out that there's a huge upside for people that live
in states without Real ID: shorter lines at the airport (90% of
travelers will have a Real ID and will go through 1 line, and 10%
will be without and go through the other line). It'll also get you
out of federal summons and jury duty :).
identification, businesses and government will issue lines of..."
It happens now with the drivers license and SSN.
The new system will be as you said, "marginally more difficult to forge" which should make it easer for law enforcment to catch ID theft rings.
Or are you saying that we should leave things as they are, allowing ID theft to go on as it is and allowing some states to issue IDs to almost any one that goes into a DMV?
If you are flying from LA to NY, the slow lane may be shorter. If any time advantage can be had from switching from the fast to the slow lane, people will jump to the slow lane.
nationals based on whatever paperwork they provide from their
home country. If, for example, you get a foreign passport issued
based on false credentials and may a falsified birth or baptismal
certificate, you will qualify for a Real ID too.
Permanent residents, people here on visas or certain types of
waivers, etc.
My problem is the suggestion that identiy protection is being essentially ignored!
[Article Quote]
Homeland Security said it would be too much work "given law enforcement's need for easy access to the information." It is, however, "open to considering technology alternatives to the PDF417 2D bar code in the future to provide greater privacy protections," which could mean RFID chips in the future. U.S. passports already have RFID chips embedded.
[End Quote]
Say WHAT?!? So if I can get ahold of your card, and using readily available technology ($250 USB barcode scanner), I can get all your information, how does this make our country more secure? It doesn't.
For all you RFID proponents (and yes, I bash the US Passport system for adopting this) I STRONGLY suggest you read Wired's article on RFID Hacking from February 2007.
I tested this myself based on information in that article, in 3 weeks, using a cheap laptop and $600 in parts from MARVAK and RadioShack I was able to duplicate and edit RFID keyfobs used to secure access to a company I worked for.
Do I think a compliant ID program (national ID) is a good idea? Yes
Do I think DHS is going to totally screw it up up by creating an unsecure solution because they don't understand the technology? Yes
Do I think the bad guys are watching this and waiting to have field day with the rather technically inept DHS? Yes
Welcome to the modern age of technology DHS, put down your billy clubs and walkie talkies, time to step up and do it right.
hide (yes folks honesty is the best policy)
Wanting to maintain your privacy - i.e; "hiding" something does
not mean you are criminal. Do you have curtains on your
windows? Have you run down to your local law enforcement
agency and provided them with all of your biometric data, a
summary of your comings and goings, a complete record of your
business transactions, what you and your wife discuss in bed at
night, what you do with your wife in bed at night, is your SS#
painted on the side of your car, et cetera?
I seriously doubt it. So, why are you advocating "honesty is the
best policy" when you are, in fact, hiding things from the powers
that be? "Hiding" does not mean that you are doing something
illegal, it means that you are, like most humans in modern
society, enjoy your privacy.
Real ID will deny you much of that privacy. As you say yourself,
it will be incredibly easy to pick up the information that will be
encoded on the back of the ID. RFID will make it even easier.
This does not even begin to take into consideration how easy it
will be to break into the databases or for them to be
mismanages. Nor does it take into consideration what will
happen when the government outsources the management of
this database to a private corporation...
The DHS is not going to "step up," as you say and do this right.
They are incapable of "doing the right thing," they're the
government. Remember Katrina and FEMA, it took them nearly a
week to just get there. And we are going to trust these people
with all our personal data?
This argument is only half right. Not having anything to hide should never equate to being guilty (Sir, step out of line.) before being proven innocent (You're clean, you're free to go.).
Homeland Security said it would be too much work "given law enforcement's need for easy access to the information."
What the?!?
I don't give a damn how much work it is or how easy they want to make it for law enforcement. I want my information secure.
As for your comment on honesty, I think you are getting two very different issues mixed up. I can be a perfectly honest person and still not want my information readily available to some backwoods cop wanting to prove his manhood.
This whole "homeland security" load of bull needs to come to a stop. I sincerely hope McCain (or whatever Republican gets the nod) loses and we get someone in the White House who will dismantle the Bush march toward Fascism.
We can't give everyone anything they want. There are limits to liberty.
Some states make it very easy to get fake IDs. In Washington the DMV is not allowed to even ask if you are a US citizen and when you get the drivers license you are auto registered to vote.
If some of the states were not stupid with their rules on issuing IDs to almost anyone (even the dead) then the Feds would not need to put their foot down.
Sorry but this isn't anarchy...Liberty has limits.
God help us all... We've become the very thing that the founding fathers would roll over in their graves to see.
The Bin Laden's of the world must be laughing their heads off. They've accomplished what they set out to do; hose our economy, and allow a lunatic in power to use fear-mongering to shred the Constitution and turn the whole country into a police state where our very movements and privacy are tracked by our own government--without a warrant.
I only hope that when the power is turned over to the Dems, their first order of business is to rip out all of this loathsome government spying on its own citizens.
sometimes wonder what we are coming to? And I understand about
security, etc. --- I spent five years in USAF's SAC!
I see one chance of things like this not happening, or least being put off, and that is if Ron Paul gets elected. Don't know if that will happen tho.
I'm afraid that we may be moving towards something that has a good chance of ending up very dark.
Anyone who actually thinks there is a difference between the Dems and Repubs also believes in the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.
As Mr. Paine, noted, don't complain.
Wake up: resist, revolt and overthrow.
Well said sir
RON PAUL 08
- My best friend and I were having a discussion on the mall next to the Smithsonian "castle" when they were merely suggesting that DHS would come to be. He was all in favor of it and thought it was a good response to the terrorist threat. I said back then it would become our equivalent of the Geschtappo and that I'd rather face terrorists. Look where we are now; mandatory national cards with mandatory presentation by an organization that considers itself not bound by the very government body, and very nation, that created it.
- We indeed reap what we sow. I'm glad I moved to a state that rejects this debacle before it was too late. I'll happily stop traveling if means I can avoid more hooks from Homeland Geschtappo. We are on the brink of dissolution as "Land of The Free". Enjoy the bed you've made, America, with your very own votes ... or vote to change it while you still can. I know I do.
One of the major causes of the American Revolution was "writs of assistance". These allowed any low-life crown employee to enter and search the property of "his betters" essentially at will.
Social Security Numbers
Barcodes
Credit Cards
Implanted ID chips
RFID
And that's just in recent history. People looking for signs and portents will always find what they're looking for.
Everyone in the health care system will almost certainly have to have an identification card. It is an open question if you'll be able to opt-out or have your own private insurance -- Billary-care doesn't want you to.
A cornerstone of cost savings in all the plans is common electronic health records. My speculation is that this will be keyed to, or actually stored in, your ID card.
Just imagine the opportunities for social engineering this opens up. You smoke? Better not get cancer or heart disease, it won't be covered, 'cause you made the choice to smoke. Want to skydive, scuba dive, ride motorcycles, fly airplanes, or do any other 'risky' activity? Better save up, 'cause you might not get covered if you get hurt. Hey, better go to the health club and diet, that might disqualify you, too.
I'm not saying any of this is inevitable, just that centralized universal health records make it possible to coerce behavior based on the threat of denial of benefits. Look at how the gummit has forced highway, school, welfare, and other mandates on the states. Think they won't be tempted to put mandates on you?
You'll have to scan your ID when you go to purchase that promiscuous software that allows you to digitally remaster old 70's tunes The RIAA is alerted... I won't even go there. By then, they'll probably have the death penalty on the books for it.
So, Hammond Hank. WHY AREN'T FOLKS LIKE YOURSELF FLOCKING TO THEIR PRIMARY "ELECTION" FUNCTIONS TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL???
I'll tell you why. THESE FOLKS WANT TO LIVE IN A NAZI STATE. That's why. Regards,
Samarami
Figure out how to get Ron Paul elected, change foreign policy, THEN you might get a sample of "Liberty". Not by having "government" grow bigger, and bigger, and bigger.....and more and more intrusive. Regards,
Samarami
- Welcome to the USSR. Keep your papers handy.
- by Geoffrey Dean Jackson February 9, 2008 10:28 AM PST
- To me this is starting to sound more and more like the soviet era Russia. Everybody there needed to keep their identification or "papers" handy, because they were subject to random checks by the local authorities.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (59 Comments)Do you Americans really want this?