Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

Comments on: Federal buildings become Real ID zones

Everyone from D.C. tourists to federal jurors could be affected by stipulation that noncompliant driver's licenses can't be used to access "federal facilities."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (48 Comments)
What a bunch of slop
by scdecade February 5, 2008 7:25 AM PST
We need to flush all of the politicians in Washington DC down the toilet. This police state anti-American filth is pure nonsense. We're becoming a militant third world banana republic all because our politicians got scared witless on 911. Who's afraid of terrorism? Not me. I'm afraid of the US federal government.
Reply to this comment
Well...
by J_Satch February 5, 2008 10:32 AM PST
if you're afraid of the federal gov't, then I would say you're afraid of terrorism.

:)
View reply
Second class citizen
by My-Self February 5, 2008 8:23 AM PST
So here it is ... there is now first and second class citizen and what diferentiate them is carying a chip that allows the government to trace them everywhere they go. How long till entrance is denied to anyone late paying a bill, not showing enough support for war / patriotism or not a GOP member ?

And they (still) call it democracy !
Reply to this comment
it'll get worse
by m.meister February 5, 2008 8:39 AM PST
wait until you'll be required to have a REAL ID just to purchase gas
or food.
Not able to serve on a Jury?
by likes2comment February 5, 2008 8:59 AM PST
My wife thinks this would be great since if you cannot enter the building, you obviously cannot serve on a jury!
Reply to this comment
wait, there's more!
by Dalkorian February 5, 2008 9:34 AM PST
Yes, this will bar you from your responsibility of serving on a
jury. It will also bar you from being a witness. It could also bar
you from voting. It will also bar you from social security and medicaid.

There is NOTHING good in this. That's why they forced it
through by attaching it secretly to a "must pass" bill funding the
troops and sending relief to the tsunami struck region in
Indonesia.

There is only one phrase you need to remember when you think
of realid - PAPERS PLEASE.
View reply
One Can Hope
by Renegade Knight February 5, 2008 10:54 AM PST
I don't see the Feds working very hard to issue Real ID's. True a Passport works (at least I think they do) but how does that help the dirt poor get a "Real ID"?

The feds are demanding that the states do their dirty work.

The real irony is that while most of the states have a problem with it, it's their own Senators and congressmen who passed the legislation. Irony. The could pass another bill to get rid of Real ID or make it a Federal Mandate to spend Federal Money doing a Federal ID for Federal Purposes to all members of the Federation upon birth or citizens ship.
Except that...
by Had_to_be_said February 5, 2008 7:50 PM PST
...if you fail to appear in court when legally summonsed (for "jury duty", for example)... the courts usually, automatically, issue a warrant for you (yes, even if the reason you failed to appear in the courtroom was because the -court officers- (at the entrance) refused to allow you entry into the building).

So... eventually, under this scenario, you will face arrest... simply for not having a "REAL-ID"... Pretty-slick, huh..?
Will this be the straw that breaks the camel's back?
by perogi21 February 5, 2008 9:14 AM PST
Is it time for individual states to take back their rights? I am surprised that VT has asked for an extension instead of following NH and Maine and just saying, "No".
United States of Northern New England sounds good to me.
Reply to this comment
Canada, anyone?
by mscatena February 5, 2008 12:36 PM PST
VT and ME could easily join the Monarchy to the North, not to mention WA, MT and some others.
BS Security
by hassan_bin_sober February 5, 2008 9:21 AM PST
This government and especially the TSA has it's head so far up it's ass it's seeing daylight! I guess it could be interpreted to prevent me from having to suffer jury duty prosecuting some pot smoker in some government building. RFID and tattoos will be next... The answer ...SHOOT BACK!
Reply to this comment
So 7-Eleven Will Require Real ID?
by Stating February 5, 2008 9:38 AM PST
They sell cold tabs with Sudafed. What about buying booze and cigs? That's controlled by ATF, another Federal agency. Hillary's healthcare? Yup, Real ID there too. Face it, a $3 trillion budget ensures that the Feds will infiltrate every aspect of your life to make America saffffferrrrrr.
Reply to this comment
Real ID
by spruceman February 5, 2008 9:46 AM PST
How long before we become the "ideal police state," in which everyone's whereabouts and actions are under surveillance, that the USSR tried 75 years and failed to become?
Reply to this comment
666-get ready for the fight!
by griznetcnet February 5, 2008 9:49 AM PST
This is the beginning of the end...
Reply to this comment
666, indeed -- it is part of our law
by paulej February 6, 2008 5:28 PM PST
In case you do not know, the US government passed a Child Support Enforcement law that is now Section 666 of Chapter 42 of US Code (http://www2.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00000666----000-.html)

Paragraph 13 of Section 666 says that unless you provide your SSN, you cannot get a professional license, driver?s license, occupational license, recreational license, or marriage license.

Here's the specific paragraph:
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00000666----000-.html#a_13_A
False Sense of Security
by Dr_Zinj February 5, 2008 10:03 AM PST
RealID, like any other form of identification, can be forged. And the people most likely to be causing damage and destruction will be the ones most likely to have fake RealIDs that won't be spotted before it's too late.

RealID will not replace ANY of the other screening procedures in place, so there is no benefit or incentive for citizens who have it.
Reply to this comment
So...
by J_Satch February 5, 2008 10:30 AM PST
this is going to stop terrorism? Will the terrorists have to get licenses that actually say TERRORIST on them?

As an extension to this silliness, maybe the IRS should not be allowed to accept tax returns from citizens in non-compliant states!
Reply to this comment
you mean...
by dondarko February 5, 2008 11:07 AM PST
IRS should not be allowed to accept tax payments(income, luxury, capital gains, etc.) from residents of non-compliant states?
View reply
First it was our SS number
by normlguyaz February 5, 2008 11:19 AM PST
Now it seems thats not enough, and why not?
Because of outlines when it was produced "for tax id purposes only.Does anyone remember that.I notice that states have been using your SS number as you state id already and few people have even asked how or why.Its funny how Colon Powell mentioned to a post cold war country how the US tracts its own people through an id meant for taxing only (your SS #) and now they are pushing for another way as well.When will it be enough and why the sudden change? Martial law with out having to anounce it? I think it might finally spark the real change we need, to disolve the union and finally clean the feds house out right.
Reply to this comment
Get It Right PLEASEEEEE
by nuckelhedd February 6, 2008 7:24 AM PST
The SS number is not for tax purposes it is and was meant to enroll you into the Government WELFARE program. That is what Social Security is was and will always be. It was a pathetic attempt to enslave us at the start and it has become the downfall of our society. Why work when Uncle Sam will take care of you. Incidentally there is no requirement for anyone to obtain an SS number. It is now and will always be an attempt to SOCIALISE our country. The same with Medicare and Medicaid and Unemployment. Stop spouting falsehoods you can easily prove false by reading a book.
View all 2 replies
1st and 2nd Class Citizens
by Rick Cavaretti February 5, 2008 11:33 AM PST
So the citizenry of this country will be denied contact with their own government unless they comply with these requirements? Freedom, anyone remember that term, where did it go?

Join the party and agree to all of its requirements or get locked out.
Reply to this comment
He who must not be named
by scdecade February 5, 2008 11:39 AM PST
Ron Paul
Reply to this comment
A thought
by efrog1074 February 5, 2008 1:04 PM PST
So, perhaps without a "Real" ID (guess the rest are "False" IDs) you could not be sent to a federal prison. After all it is a federal building.
Reply to this comment
Inconvenience?
by ktmotox February 5, 2008 1:16 PM PST
Declan McCullagh sure has a visible bias on this issue. "the prospect of inconveniencing millions of otherwise law-abiding Americans."

Well, perhaps I object to getting a driver's license and having my personal information stored on a DMV database. The state law doesn't allow me to drive if I don't have a state issued driver's license. This is an inconvenience to all of those us reject the driver's license requirements. The Big Brother fascist state government is taking away my freedom. We should demand that our state legislatures get rid of the driver's license requirement. Those who would trade freedom for safety (to paraphrase) deserver neither.

Declan McCullagh also has any obvious case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. He blames the president when this is truly a bipartisan law.
Reply to this comment
well...
by pjhenry1216 February 6, 2008 5:31 AM PST
technically, the Constitution doesn't give you the right to drive. Honestly, if you got rid of the driver's license requirement, I'm fairly certain accident numbers would soar, plus insurance costs would skyrocket. Only the rich would be able to pay for insurance, poor and even middle class would have to risk the huge fines if they get into accidents without insurance. You'd get more hit & runs due to that. Overall, its a terrible terrible idea.
No
by scdecade February 5, 2008 1:22 PM PST
I'm not really afraid of 'terrorism' as a tactic. That'd be like being afraid of being hit by lightening, which is silly. The US federal government's scare-mongering doesn't seem too terrifying. Am I afraid a terrorist is going to be able to commit some act of violence BECAUSE we didn't have a Real ID card? Hahaha -- yeah right! Get real, lmao. No, the Feds are only scary when they pass laws which deprive citizens of their natural rights. This is what has happened and it's a big shame too. We were given a free somewhat country and it's been allowed to be turned into a war business obedient meat grinder. Basically, I'm afraid of the new laws.
Reply to this comment
A Sad day
by tim52 February 5, 2008 3:19 PM PST
They know us because we are not organized. They control us because we are dependent. They do this because we allow them.
Who among us will lead? Lead by example! Will it be a common man or woman? If our media controls our thoughts and the secret few control them, who will expose them? Look around you and ask who is on your team? Is your family? Are your friends? How big is your circle of influence? Make noise be heard!!!!
Reply to this comment
NWO
by mythicalpoet February 5, 2008 4:13 PM PST
Bin Laden was an ex-CIA operative who was killed over five years ago as stated by Bhutto in a BBC interview.. Al-CIA-duh was created and funded by the the United States. The NWO globalists are in control of both sides of this war and will be until global government is obtained. The invasion of Mexico and the crash of the dollar will precipitate the North American Union and then all of the Unions across the world will merge. A global tyranny will be complete. This plan has been in action for over sixty years. There is nothing you can do about it. Do not accept the chip--the antichrist is coming soon and all Christians will be persecuted.
Reply to this comment
North American Union & New World Order
by mythicalpoet February 5, 2008 4:16 PM PST
Al-CIA-duh was created and funded by the United States; do the research people. The NWO globalists are in control of both sides of this war and will be until global government is obtained. The invasion of Mexico and the crash of the dollar will precipitate the North American Union and then all of the Unions across the world will merge. A global tyranny will be complete. This plan has been in action for over sixty years. There is nothing you can do about it. Do not accept the chip--doing so condemns you according to the Bible. The Antichrist is coming soon and all Christians will be persecuted. Live for your soul, not for your life.
Reply to this comment
Civil liberties should never be traded away.
by as901 February 6, 2008 5:27 AM PST
One of our nations founders said, "Anyone who would trade freedom for safety deserves neither freedom nor safety." The government is currently chipping away at the Bill of Rights. The Constitution is almost completely gone. If you believe in the American way of life, you must stand up against any further attempts at the destruction of the Bill of Rights. You must fight to reverse this very dangerous trend, If we trade our freedoms away, the terrorists have already won.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (48 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement
Click Here