Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: Vote for the 2009 Game of the Year!

Comments on: Real ID could mean real travel headaches

A May deadline is just one flash point in a political showdown between Homeland Security and states that oppose Real ID demands.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (105 Comments)
Look at the free states on your map! I see Dixie!
by TogetherinParis February 4, 2008 4:39 AM PST
Dixie says no, baby. I, for one, prefer to keep as much freedom as
possible.
Reply to this comment
Check your history book again
by Get_Bent February 4, 2008 9:58 AM PST
Since when were Maine, New Hampshire, Montana, and Oklahoma in the Confederacy? Those last two weren't even states back then. South Carolina is the only one that I see; they've never had any love-loss for the federal government.

Next thing you know, DHS will suggest planting ID tags under your skin to track you like a house pet. This whole idea smacks of fascist Germany in the 1930's. Our politicians are a bunch of short-sighted, ignorant buffoons!
Eat a good meal first
by menty666 February 4, 2008 5:55 AM PST
That way they have a little extra to find during the full body cavity search. I figure if it's going to happen,make the most of it :)

Remember, the TSA tool isn't the one to yell at at the airport, you want to scream at your congressional representation for going along with this. No, I don't work for the TSA, I just sympathize with them since I'm sure they're yelled at everyday for simply doing their job of enforcing arbitrary rules. That does make them a bunch of tools (if the gov't) though :-)
Reply to this comment
Calling it a job
by Lee in San Diego February 4, 2008 6:57 AM PST
Calling it a job doesn't make it okay.
TSA
by kenny-J February 4, 2008 10:27 AM PST
I agree that the screener on the line is just doing the job they are told to do. Just like the Nazi's of the 1930's.

Have you found a polite one yet that doesn't seem to enjoy the power they have inherited?
View reply
That great sucking sound you will hear is....
by Expat type February 4, 2008 6:33 AM PST
The huge amounts of people refusing to fly. When the US airlines go bankrupt, then only Pack-it-to-stan and Sow-deea airlines will be able to fly. I personally account for $10,000 a year in airline tickets that will not be used in the US. Just refuse to fly till they get real again. No problem, and it is good for the ecology! When will they go after the problems and quit punishing everybody? It is getting to be time for a revolution again where we hang the politicians from that sour apple tree...
Reply to this comment
Hillary will make us buy air tickets and insurance??
by Expat type February 4, 2008 6:43 AM PST
The common thread seems to be that government knows best and they will force you to do what is good for them and you....UNNH-Huh! Right!!!!
Let us hope that one does not get elected. She fits right in with all of my ex wives and Homeland Security....and as they say in Louisiana.............I Doan Believe!
Boycott Flying in May....The Tea Party lives!
View reply
Actually
by Lee in San Diego February 4, 2008 6:54 AM PST
That great sucking sound is the Bush Administration, it really
sucks.
I've already started
by m.meister February 4, 2008 9:55 AM PST
Ever since they started doing semi-strip searches, I've become
more reluctant to fly.

If I feel like being treated like a criminal thug, I'll go down to my
local jail and ask for a strip search.

I realize some people will pay to be treated like crap - -not me.
REAL ID is a real sham.
by inachu February 4, 2008 7:26 AM PST
I am 100% sure that someday a hacker will build a scanner to scan people walking around and suck up their juicy info.

Cameras on building corners will have scanners on them as well to pick up this data.

Everything about you. Health records given at a moments notice and you are not aware of it and not notified
as you do not have a choice in the matter about who scans you.
Reply to this comment
Already there...
by umbrae February 4, 2008 7:54 AM PST
You can do this really easy with cheap software for smartphones and PDAs. The same software shipping companies use to track RFID on packages.

Of course, this may not be an issue with RealID if they "Actually" removed this requirement. However, anyone that swipes it or has physical access to it will be able to get any of your personal information on it. This would be a one-stop shop for identify fraud.
Federal ID
by vio1234 February 4, 2008 7:44 AM PST
So the federal goverment can not enforce the states what do in regards to state identification standards, but seem to get around it with the clause the federal goverment will not accept as ID unless it has been certified.

When do you need an ID for the federal goverment? Shouldn't my passport cover any federal need?
I guess maybe an I-9 form
Reply to this comment
Passports....
by umbrae February 4, 2008 7:58 AM PST
I believe the article states US passports will work for states that have filed for an extension, but not sure what that means long term.

RealID is supposed to be required to enter a federal building or when traveling (i.e. planes, border checks, etc.).
View reply
What else??
by HiTechP February 4, 2008 8:38 AM PST
Can a federal government issued Resident Alien Card (aka "Green Card") be used as a Read ID compliant identification?
Federal ID
by doninvest February 4, 2008 8:40 AM PST
Your passport is fine if you travel overseas its much easier all around. The ID is cheaper and will cover people traveling into MX and bordering countries. Try traveling to Europe and Asia now without a passport. It will not happen
OMG! more ID on my wallet?
by plee9 February 4, 2008 8:02 AM PST
okay. unless this ID replaces my driver's license, passport, and citizenship card, I oppose this idea. How many ID's do I have to carry to travel?
Reply to this comment
Papers, please.............
by kenny-J February 4, 2008 10:36 AM PST
'nff said.
Citizenship card?
by ktmotox February 4, 2008 12:53 PM PST
What's a Citizenship Card? I've never heard of that one.
Get a passport!
by dman1800 February 4, 2008 8:17 AM PST
Now I feel justified having gotten passports for every member of my family, even though not everyone has immediate plans to travel outside of the country.
Reply to this comment
not a fan of transmitting my data to everyone
by m.meister February 4, 2008 10:05 AM PST
I'm not a big fan of transmitting my data to everyone because it is
more convenient for our gov't. That is essentially what the new
passports are designed to do.

Oh, and yes -- it's for your protection. Seems everything is "for our
protection" these days. That's a phrase used when anyone
questions the abuse of our gov't.
I guess that makes me a criminal and a terrorist.
by Dr_Zinj February 4, 2008 8:23 AM PST
Of course Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is far too narrow minded and lacking in historical knowledge to see that he is fulfilling the role that the Gestapo filled in Nazi Germany. DHS is one of the worst things to happen to American personal liberties, and this RealID is just one more tool they are using to grind the common man down.

Follow the money and you'll understand the real reasons behind RealID - it's not to protect Americans, it's to make a small group of Americans rich, and enable self-serving senators and congressmen to keep their plush jobs.
Reply to this comment
Well said
by BruceLawrence February 4, 2008 8:54 AM PST
I posted something similar below about becoming a Police State.

I have not heard any candidate running for President who has said anything against this "National ID" besides Ron Paul.

This country is going to rot from the inside out if we don't do something about it.

The American People have lost complete control of their government. It has been hijacked and we are just going to sit back and watch it happen.

Go to www.ronpaul2008.com if you even care about this country anymore.
View reply
Vegas Cubs Scan barcode already
by disco-legend-zeke February 4, 2008 8:26 AM PST
If you go to a club in Las Vegas, be sure your date doesn't enter at the same time, unless your date is your wife.

Some nightclubs here use your driver's license not only to verify you are of drinking age, but compile a list of individual names, address, and time of entry by scanning your license.

If you are accused of a crime, it might be the perfect alibi, but if you are cheating, a clever divorce attorney could sopoena these records and show who you were entering with.

As this practice becomes more prevalent, there will soon be a more complete record of your every move.

Of course, you have nothing to hide, rigt?
Reply to this comment
We are turning into a Police State
by BruceLawrence February 4, 2008 8:27 AM PST
This is unbelievable. I can't believe I'm living in a country that is the "light of the free world".

This has been coming for a while and the warnings have been there all along but nobody listened.

Ron Paul has been telling us its coming and each time he does he gets snickers and laughs from the rest of those cookie cutter people who claim to be "conservative republicans".

This isnt about terrorism. This is about the US Government wanting control of our lives and forcing themselves into it. They have no business doing what they're doing and the sheep of the US are going to sit back and let them do it too.

Its time to fight back and elect someone into the White House who wont even attempt to do this to the American people. Ron Paul.
Reply to this comment
Re: Police State
by Renegade.Rivers February 4, 2008 9:02 AM PST
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Benjamin Franklin

Is their any doubt that what is happening here is not for our protection, or in our best interest. At best it's misguided attempt, and at worst its an evil conspiracy.
View reply
Ebough about Ron Paul
by PzkwVIb February 4, 2008 4:34 PM PST
The man doesn't have a snowball's chance in heck of winning, so just get over yourself and stop reposting his name every other message.
"Light of the free world" no more
by mscatena February 5, 2008 5:38 AM PST
To be frank with you guys, I don?t call the United States ?the light of the free world? by any stretch of imagination. And I live in Brazil ? a much ?freer? country:

? We make no difference between a foreigner and a local in terms of criminal law, incarcerations and access to lawyers;

? We do have unrestrained Habeas Corpus;

? No surveillance of any kind without court order;

? No incarcerations (and pardons) by Presidential fiat;

? A tax auditor cannot put a hold on your property without a court order;

? At last but not the least: airport screeners are mostly nice people.

Want to see freedom? Go to Holland. Ok, Holland would not be there if it were not for the USA liberating it during WWII. But that was another USA that is no more. This is sad.
Federal Reserve to Rule America
by novelator February 7, 2008 5:11 AM PST
To get to the bottom line here, folks, the Real ID act is just one more attempt by the Federal Reserve to control America by way of our own government.

They need to know where everyone is and goes at every hour of the day and night in order to prevent revolution. And these banker, they know this.

And none of the so-called front runners, save Ron Paul, have done anything to prevent the Federal Reserve from taking control of our country. They would rather kiss butt and sell their own people down the river than stand up and fight for our freedoms.

The peaceful answer to all this is very simple. It's within the power of all of us to effect. Hit them where it hurts--in the pocketbook. Don't fly, don't pay your credit cards, and watch the economy tank. Then Congress will be forced to show us all where their loyalties truly lie by acting. And then we'll know whether the outcome is going to be bloody or not.

One thing that really bothers me is the fight with the IRS. I'm growing more and more convinced each day that the issue is merely being used as a way to ferret out and prosecute, indeed, jail those individuals who are the staunchest patriots among us.

It's easier and safer to not pay your credit cards. If they garnish your wages, and according to my sources within the banking industry, that's a big IF, just find another job. It costs the banks a lot of money to serve papers on your employer each month to continue the garnishing, and if you quit and find another job, it will cost them even more to find you.

Let's remember who we're really fighting here and exploit the loopholes. If enough of us take one small action in not paying our credit cards, we might just avoid a bloodbath in taking our country back from those bankers who mean to rule.

M.L. Bushman
RE: Real-ID-means-real-travel-headaches
by protagonistic February 4, 2008 8:30 AM PST
"Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff even went so far as
to say that only criminals and terrorists should be "disappointed"
with the Real ID rules."

Well strap me to a hog and roll me in the mud. According to Mr.
Chertoff I must be either a criminal or a terrorist.
Reply to this comment
Federal ID
by doninvest February 4, 2008 8:35 AM PST
Its about time we need to stop illegal entry and unknown people in this country. If they had done this in 1984 the last time they tried to stop illegal entry, we would have slowed down people coming in and would not have the mess we have today.
Reply to this comment
The Next Step
by spruceman February 4, 2008 8:58 AM PST
Think this is something, the Bushkies probably will insist on Real ID or a passport in order to cross State lines pretty soon.
Reply to this comment
Bushie's?
by ktmotox February 4, 2008 12:59 PM PST
From what I understand, Real ID grew out of recommendations of the 911 commission. The 911 commission was created by Democrats to politically attack the president. Real ID is the Democrats idea, which fits with their love of big intrusive government.
Remember who insisted on creating DHS
by wlamia February 4, 2008 9:24 AM PST
I am a absolute appalled by and opposed to this RealID as anyone here, but I want to remind everyone that it was the Democrat (or maybe it should be "Republicrats") that insisted on creating a new Department that would "do something" to protect us. The Bush administration was heavily criticized for dragging its feet on the enabling legislation.
Reply to this comment
actually..
by m.meister February 4, 2008 10:35 AM PST
Bush created the Office of Homeland Security (OHS) in 2001. The
Congress, foaming at the mouth to appear patriotic, created the
Department of Homeland Security a year later.

The true irony is that Republicans (who were in control of the
Congress) seemed to forget their whole small government
platform and created the 3rd largest department in our gov't.

Not that the Democrats have anything to be proud of, not very
many stood against the measures, since any opposition was
characterized as unpatriotic.

However, the Republicans do deserve the brunt of the
responsibility. It was their Congress/President and it was the
exact opposite of everything they stood for in the past. Under
their watch, we have the largest government ever.
You're Mistaken
by markdoiron February 4, 2008 10:49 AM PST
Here's the legislative history:

March 21, 2001 H.R.1158, to establish the National Homeland Security Agency, introduced by Representative Thornberry., REPUBLICAN

September 21, 2001 S. 1449, to establish the National Office for Combating Terrorism, introduced by Senator Graham. REPUBLICAN

October 10, 2001 H.R. 3078, to establish the National Office for Combating Terrorism, introduced by Representative Hastings. DEMOCRAT

October 11, 2001 S. 1534, to establish the Department of National Homeland
Security, introduced by Senator Lieberman. DEMOCRAT (WHO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY SUPPORTED IN HIS RECENT REELECTION BID)

May 2, 2002 S. 2452, to establish the Department of National Homeland Security and the National Office for Combating Terrorism, introduced by Senator Lieberman. SEE PREVIOUS

May 2, 2002 H.R. 4660, to establish the Department of National Homeland Security and the National Office for Combating Terrorism, introduced by Representative Thornberry. REPUBLICAN

May 22, 2002 S. 2452 ordered reported by the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee. REPUBLICANS IN CONTROL OF THE COMMITTEE

June 6, 2002 President Bush announces intention to send Congress legislation for the purpose of establishing a Department of Homeland Security. REPUBLICAN INITIATIVE

June 24, 2002 H.R. 5005, to establish the Department of Homeland Security and for other purposes introduced by Representative Armey (by request). REPUBLICAN

July 24, 2002 H.R. 5005 reported, amended, H.Rept. 107-609, Part I, by Select Committee on Homeland Security. REPUBLICANS IN CHARGE OF COMMITTEE

July 25-26, 2002 H.R. 5005, after consideration and debate, passes the House. REPUBLICANS IN CHARGE OF THE HOUSE

November 19, 2002 Senate passes H.R. 5005, amended, Vote ... 90-9. REPUBLICANS IN CHARGE OF SENATE

November 25, 2002 President Bush signs P.L. 107-296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002. REPUBLICAN SIGNED IT INTO LAW

mark d.
View all 2 replies
Real ID, what next?
by Vintage Wings February 4, 2008 9:44 AM PST
With the implementation of real ID how much longer will it be before the Geheimstaatspolizei require travel permits between states, checkpoints at state lines, or ID chips implanted in our hands or arms? What's coming next? I thought the people of our country would have had the foresight to vote down this insult to our freedom. Evidently not.
I say Hoorah! for the non-compliant states. Thank God I live in one.
Reply to this comment
the key
by m.meister February 4, 2008 10:01 AM PST
the key to stealing your rights is to taking them a little at a time.

Mix in a little fear mongering and presto! You've got the
makings of a true police state.

Sure, you have no more freedom left -- but don't you feel safer?
That is unless you say something to upset someone in power,
then it's off the Gitmo. Laws and citizens' rights don't get in the
way there.
See FreedomToFascism.com
by libertyforall1776 February 4, 2008 9:54 AM PST
For more explanation of where this is all going, see Aaron Russo's
documentary movie, America: Freedom To Fascism:
http://freedomtofascism.com

The movie is linked up free from the Director on Google video...
Reply to this comment
witnesses to the end of democracy
by m.meister February 4, 2008 10:17 AM PST
We have failed to learn anything from recent history.

As such, we are now witnessing the slow end of democracy, at least as
far as our founding fathers were concerned. They distrusted gov't --
now we know why. They were careful not to put too much power in one
branch, now we know why.

No -- instead, we'll have a police state. We may hold elections (just like
Iraqis did under Saddam) where the outcome is already decided (hmm,
Saddam got 100% of the vote in Iraq). It will all be a sham to make us
feel like we "are free".

Our rights are evaporating faster than a puddle on a hot summer's day in
Arizona.

All of it is being done in the name of freedom and security. All the "other
democracies" that could help us are instead taking our lead.

I feel a great sadness as we, the people, have so readily given up our
freedoms for the false security promised to us by men who were waiting
in the wings with their plans, waiting for just the right moment and
conditions to spring their plans on our country.

We have failed to heed the warnings that history. I feel ashamed.
Reply to this comment
The end of democracy?
by magicman73 February 4, 2008 10:40 AM PST
Oy! Where does one begin with this drivel?

First of all, this country is not a democracy. Never was, never will be. We ARE a democratic REPUBLIC and there is a vast difference there. If you don't know what those differences are might I suggest you get yourself to the nearest library.

Second, you show me an instance where any American President received more than....65% of the popular vote and maybe your whining will mean something.

Next, tell me a single right that you have lost. Tell me one. You can still vote. You can still protest and seek redress of perceived wrongs. You are still allowed to post utter nonsense such as this. All this without the threat of government reprise.

Just to be clear, air travel is not a right. Hell, travel is not even a right. I don't know of any legal language within the Constitution which states that people are allowed to travel freely between states without requiring some sort of documentation. If I am wrong there then please let me know. Assuming that I am right do not take the fact that there was never a roadblock to traveling across state lines without being required to provide documentation as a right.

You, like the vast majority of the loons, seem to have this amazing talent for creating rights where none existed previously.

That said I do agree that the Real ID system is a joke. We already have a national ID card in place. That would be the Social Security cards we all have and they are worthless. We were never supposed to give them out and now we have to give out those numbers as well as our birthday numbers just to open a bank account.

What truly makes no sense is that as of May-08 I, and many like me, will suddenly become "persona non-grata" simply because my state would have decided to not participate when in fact the people who simply cannot wait for May-08 are the terrorists who have proper ID's.

Literally, this is building the castle wall around the enemy camp.

One of the stupidest, and most costly, errors in judgment to date.
View all 4 replies
Real ID
by kenny-J February 4, 2008 10:22 AM PST
Bush created the most onerous Federal bureaucracy yet with DHS. No oversight, no accountability, pass unfunded mandates to the States, clog airports. None of the presidental candidates have even touched this. I suppose it means that we'll be stuck with this nightmare till doomsday.

Even if it was announced in 05, DHS just released the regs--300 pages no less---, so how would the States know what to comply with without the regs?

Think it's bad from the passengers side? You ought to see it from the airport's side. Each little dictator from TSA at each airport gets to decide for him/herself what regulations (not talking Real ID now) mean and what the airport has to do to comply. We have TSA creep--they are taking more and more terminal square footage without paying for it, the passengers pay for it through PFC's.

Getting a passport is not the answer---they'll find some way to make it unallowable except to cross the border.

Thank god my life is coming to an end---I fear we are headed for National meltdown, the Constitution can go to hell, the Feds will take over everything and issue jack boots to the civil servants. I never thought I'd live to see a federal agency as frieghtening as DHS, it ain't gonna get better, pardners.
Reply to this comment
Disband Heartland--Oops, Homeland--Security
by markdoiron February 4, 2008 10:30 AM PST
Department of Homeland Security should be disbanded. Everything they want to do, including much that borders on unconstitutional, is in the name of fighting terrorism. And those of us who would fight for our privacy and constitutional rights are branded as being soft on terrorism. Disband this ill-named office (am I the only one who thinks of "The Heartland" from that TV show where the Communists took over the U.S.?) and fire the employees.

--mark d., CMSgt, USAF, Retired
Reply to this comment
I've always thought...
by kenny-J February 4, 2008 10:48 AM PST
the Department of Homeland Security sounded like a politbureau from the heyday of Communism.
I agree 100%
by inachu February 4, 2008 12:00 PM PST
Even the naming of calling it HOMELAND SECURITY was taken from HITLER when hitlers rise of Facism came about. Everything that Germany has done USA is doing it now but this time not for just USA but applying this to the WORLD. Spreading of religion and commercialism = World War 3.

Even sons and daughters of parents who were Holocaust survivors are on the terror watch list.
This is not right!
This is security RUN AMOK!
My version of security would put USA in a defensive stance and become the country the world loves once again.
View reply
Homeland-insecurity
by maxfield jones February 4, 2008 6:18 PM PST
I agree, homeland security should be abolished, this
organization
is a waste of taxpayers money and as you say, it infringes on our
dwindling rights as citizens. I am fed up with this so-called war
on terrorism. The more I dissect 9/11, the more it looks like an
inside job, and I am not kidding. The Bush government is the
real "Axis Of Evil". This fear factor perpetrated on the people is
working on the idiots who will not or cannot think for
themselves and believe every lie the media lays on them. They
killed Kennedy and got away with it....we need to get "mad". I
know I am!
buy guns and ammo
by likes2comment February 4, 2008 10:33 AM PST
for the day is coming that they will be needed....
Reply to this comment
Right to bear arms
by ByteMuncher February 4, 2008 1:25 PM PST
I asked my Dad, a longtime NRA member, what it would take for him to fight against a tyranical government. His answer was basically that he would not. Too many gun-toters are not even aware that 'the right to bear arms' has nothing to do with hunting or personal protection, and has everything to do with opposing an oppressive government.
Showing 1 of 3 pages (105 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement