Comments on: Technology Voters' Guide: Ron Paul
Republican thinks a free market is key to broadband expansion and that feds should stay out of mergers and social networks.
Republican thinks a free market is key to broadband expansion and that feds should stay out of mergers and social networks.
January 8, 2010 1:34 PM PST
January 8, 2010 1:25 PM PST
January 8, 2010 1:23 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
"Read on for responses from Sen. Hillary Clinton, or check out CNET News.com's election coverage roundup, featuring other Technology Voters' Guide candidate reports."
Did you forget to change Hillary Clinton to Ron Paul?
And you're right: We forgot to change "Hillary Clinton" to "Ron Paul." The reference to Clinton was part of the intro section, which is identical across all the candidate Q&As -- except, of course, that the name of the candidate should have been changed in that one paragraph.
The quotes are most assuredly from Ron Paul.
But I think it would have been better to release them all at once.
I am extremely glad that Ron Paul and Hillary were the first released, and possibly the only ones to respond.
Ron Paul FTW.
Our goal was to have them all published before the New Hampshire primary. Under the "special coverage" graphic we list the candidates who responded. So far we've published responses from four, Paul, McCain, Clinton, and Obama.
Maybe we should have published them all at once; we haven't done this exact format before so we're still trying to find the best way to do it. (Our '06 scorecard -- a rating, not surveys -- was all-at once.) Your feedback is welcome and appreciated.
copy of materials they have purchased"
"The federal government has no right tracking who uses the
Internet and why they are doing so."
It's really nice to hear someone in washington actually say these
things.
However, no interest in anti-trust regulations or net neutrality.
With Ron Paul it's a little weird like that, he'll protect liberty and
privacy perfectly, but has the flawed libertarian idea that the market
can do no wrong and needs no regulation. Still, who else can you
better trust to maintain liberty.
Banks have failed before and the country is still here, more or less. Bank of North America, Bank of the United States, Second Bank of the United States. In every case, those ripped the public through inflation.
Since the stealth implementation of the Fed, we've always had banks propped up by the govt. And you do realise that costs the taxpayers, right?
The free market approach is: you made your bed, now lie in it. And it's no as though regulation has not existed -- and been ignored. Feddie and Fannie were supposed to be limited to resonsible mortgages, yet FCredit Suisse published a chart of their exposure in July last year.
Money market funds were supposed to be limited to low-risk investments -- but no one was minding the store.
Part of this can be laid to the MSM. Notice how even now the mantra of 'sub-prime' is virtually mentioned in every autopsy of the mortgage/credit crunch. Yet all the cheerleaders were 'rah rah' onward and upward. Just like the were with Enron. Even the SEC approved the bizarre accounting practices, so far removed from GAAC, of Arthur Anderson accounting firm. Yet when Enron imploded, we got the usual "No one could have foreseen ... '
Since 1913, no banker has been harmed in the making of any of the monetary disasters. Food for thought.
Is it possible that either you or Dr. Paul added a u to the word "fond" by mistake. I am pretty sure he is not "found" of the Internet.
BTW - his comments are consistent and well considered. I just wish that your questions would have included other technology areas like energy and medical research.
our liberties as long as we do not infringe on others rights.
Anything not in the Constitution is not authorized to the Fed.
Gov., and must be left to the States, or the people.
That is basically what Ron Paul said, and that is the law.
- Sound Perspective
- by Metaljman January 7, 2008 11:50 AM PST
- Ron Paul shows he understands how private industry works. The evasive so called "Net Neutrality Act" would only serve to cause technological sterility in the ISP development world.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(17 Comments)My rule: If Ted Kennedy supports it, I don't.