Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life

Comments on: Technology Voters' Guide: Ron Paul

Republican thinks a free market is key to broadband expansion and that feds should stay out of mergers and social networks.
Special coverage: Election 2008

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Wrong quotes, or wrong person?
by Spuds6021 January 3, 2008 5:01 AM PST
In the middle of the Ron Paul article, you state:

"Read on for responses from Sen. Hillary Clinton, or check out CNET News.com's election coverage roundup, featuring other Technology Voters' Guide candidate reports."

Did you forget to change Hillary Clinton to Ron Paul?
Reply to this comment
Right quotes for Ron Paul
by Jon Skillings January 3, 2008 5:49 AM PST
Urk. Thanks for the catch.

And you're right: We forgot to change "Hillary Clinton" to "Ron Paul." The reference to Clinton was part of the intro section, which is identical across all the candidate Q&As -- except, of course, that the name of the candidate should have been changed in that one paragraph.

The quotes are most assuredly from Ron Paul.
View reply
RP FTW
by mickrussom January 3, 2008 5:26 AM PST
Ron Paul, 2008, FTW. We are tired of the lame stream media, the yellow journalism, the lies, the wars, the broken dollar, the identity politics and the military industrial complex. America is waking up to freedom and liberty. Its our last chance to have them again if we chose to walk with Ron Paul. If we don't chose him, we will become more authoritarian and America will no longer be what the founders wanted it to be and it will become a hell on earth with a dropping standard of living.
Reply to this comment
Staged rollout
by loki_racer January 3, 2008 5:56 AM PST
I'm not a writer or a publisher, so maybe I don't understand why the rollout of these articles was staged(1 per day or whatever the rate is).

But I think it would have been better to release them all at once.

I am extremely glad that Ron Paul and Hillary were the first released, and possibly the only ones to respond.

Ron Paul FTW.
Reply to this comment
rollout...
by declan00 January 3, 2008 8:59 AM PST
It's a fair question.

Our goal was to have them all published before the New Hampshire primary. Under the "special coverage" graphic we list the candidates who responded. So far we've published responses from four, Paul, McCain, Clinton, and Obama.

Maybe we should have published them all at once; we haven't done this exact format before so we're still trying to find the best way to do it. (Our '06 scorecard -- a rating, not surveys -- was all-at once.) Your feedback is welcome and appreciated.
Mostly excellent
by Nicholas Buenk January 3, 2008 3:14 PM PST
"I would tend to protect the rights of consumers to make a backup
copy of materials they have purchased"
"The federal government has no right tracking who uses the
Internet and why they are doing so."
It's really nice to hear someone in washington actually say these
things.
However, no interest in anti-trust regulations or net neutrality.
With Ron Paul it's a little weird like that, he'll protect liberty and
privacy perfectly, but has the flawed libertarian idea that the market
can do no wrong and needs no regulation. Still, who else can you
better trust to maintain liberty.
Reply to this comment
Think it through
by NoVista January 3, 2008 6:49 PM PST
Given we've never had a free market since 1913, it's hardly a flaw to try alternatives.

Banks have failed before and the country is still here, more or less. Bank of North America, Bank of the United States, Second Bank of the United States. In every case, those ripped the public through inflation.

Since the stealth implementation of the Fed, we've always had banks propped up by the govt. And you do realise that costs the taxpayers, right?

The free market approach is: you made your bed, now lie in it. And it's no as though regulation has not existed -- and been ignored. Feddie and Fannie were supposed to be limited to resonsible mortgages, yet FCredit Suisse published a chart of their exposure in July last year.

Money market funds were supposed to be limited to low-risk investments -- but no one was minding the store.

Part of this can be laid to the MSM. Notice how even now the mantra of 'sub-prime' is virtually mentioned in every autopsy of the mortgage/credit crunch. Yet all the cheerleaders were 'rah rah' onward and upward. Just like the were with Enron. Even the SEC approved the bizarre accounting practices, so far removed from GAAC, of Arthur Anderson accounting firm. Yet when Enron imploded, we got the usual "No one could have foreseen ... '

Since 1913, no banker has been harmed in the making of any of the monetary disasters. Food for thought.
Doublespeak
by davemesaaz January 3, 2008 5:18 PM PST
Another case of Ron Paul Doublespeak. How can you be for the free market and for subsidies?
Reply to this comment
Read that again...
by BarkerDigital January 4, 2008 7:10 AM PST
I assume you are referring to his answer on the high-speed Internet access question. He is saying subsidies will not work. He is against subsidies, not for them.
Possible typographical error
by Rod Adams January 4, 2008 4:55 AM PST
In the last comment about favorite devices, you quoted Dr. Paul as saying "Of course, I am particularly found of the Internet, since it has played such a key role in organizing grassroots support for my presidential campaign."

Is it possible that either you or Dr. Paul added a u to the word "fond" by mistake. I am pretty sure he is not "found" of the Internet.

BTW - his comments are consistent and well considered. I just wish that your questions would have included other technology areas like energy and medical research.
Reply to this comment
Typo fixed
by Zoe Slocum January 4, 2008 10:38 AM PST
Yes, it should have been "fond." Thanks!
Fed. Gov. Must Follow Constitution
by libertyforall1776 January 4, 2008 11:16 AM PST
The Federal Government Must Follow the Constitution, and defend
our liberties as long as we do not infringe on others rights.
Anything not in the Constitution is not authorized to the Fed.
Gov., and must be left to the States, or the people.

That is basically what Ron Paul said, and that is the law.
Reply to this comment
If I vote, I will vote for Ron Paul
by TimeTraveler2000 January 5, 2008 9:45 PM PST
Im still debating on if Ill vote or not. Even though Ron Paul is the only choice, I have little faith in the united States government and many of the citizens of this nation.
Reply to this comment
or...
by A_N_Onymous January 7, 2008 6:49 PM PST
you could just get over yourself and vote...
Ron Paul Media
by LBriant January 6, 2008 8:04 AM PST
Isn't it Funny how the Media can cover NASCAR events weekly all summer every year better than they can cover our candadates for president?
Reply to this comment
Sound Perspective
by Metaljman January 7, 2008 11:50 AM PST
Ron Paul shows he understands how private industry works. The evasive so called "Net Neutrality Act" would only serve to cause technological sterility in the ISP development world.

My rule: If Ted Kennedy supports it, I don't.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement