Comments on: Senate committee OKs bills on personal data breaches
Overlapping measures prescribe new rules for government agencies and private firms that experience break-ins. Will they become law?
Overlapping measures prescribe new rules for government agencies and private firms that experience break-ins. Will they become law?
December 3, 2009 1:10 PM PST
December 3, 2009 12:59 PM PST
December 3, 2009 12:47 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
- Required or not?
- by wbenton May 4, 2007 11:35 AM PDT
- Under the currently passed laws, stealing personal information is already illegal. That said, what good does this new bill do that the previously passed bills could not?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Required - but not this proposal
- by somurdoch May 5, 2007 10:29 AM PDT
- What the US has so far failed to do is to approach the problem of personal privacy in a comprehensive way, as has been done in the EU. What is needed is not more piecemeal legislation, but a single statute to protect personal privacy regardless of the industry, media or sector (private vs. state government vs. federal) involved.
- Like this
-
- Why do banks put money in a vault?
- by kmccanlies May 7, 2007 1:42 PM PDT
- Why do banks put money in a vault? Stealing the money is already against the law, so why not just stack it in the middle of the floor in the lobby of the bank?
- Like this
-
(3 Comments)We MUST seek to implement current laws to their fullest extent prior to creating new laws which could easily end us up in more red tape than we require!!!
Walt
While it is also against the law to steal money, I think we would all agree that our bank has an obligation to protect that money. And an obligation to let us know if our money gets stolen.
The same for data privacy. While identity theft is against the law, this legislation will help require companies to protect that data and to let us know if it is compromised.