Comments on: House panel grills Sirius chief on XM merger
Politicians say they want to keep an open mind but indicate the deal may have high hurdles to leap.
Politicians say they want to keep an open mind but indicate the deal may have high hurdles to leap.
December 7, 2009 5:00 PM PST
December 7, 2009 4:34 PM PST
December 7, 2009 3:47 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
It is obvious that only one of these two companies can survive in the current environment (and it is increasingly looking like Sirius), so they should allow the merger, but with some caveats.
A moratorium on price increases for reasonable period of time, say 18-24 months.
A plan for merging the two systems into one within a fixed period of time and returning the unused spectrum for use by a future competitor.
The opportunity for customers of both companies to have a say in how programming is merged.
I have XM, and I will not be happy -- meaning I will cancel -- if I am forced to buy new equipment.
Someone mentioned Clear Channel's domination of free airwaves. They own a big chunk of XM too and have already destroyed a big portion of the value proposition by forcing commericals. They will own a big chunk of the combined company as well. Breaking up that monopoly is where the FCC and Congress should really be focusing their time and attention.
There are distinct advantages and disadvantages to the two types of Satellites being used. We used the XM radio on our move across the country and had to turn it off through much of Western Wyoming, Idaho, Montana because the hills kept cutting off the signal. A dual mode radio would give more consistent coverage. (Sirius satellites change their relative position above the earth so technically should be able to handle valleys much better.)
Finally, my series 1 Delphi MyFi is suffering for quality issues. I'm going to have to replace it soon. Let's get this merger over soon so I can buy the new dual mode / advanced radio. (Let's get real, yes you can still use your original analog Star-Tac phone, but the newest services require the newest equipment. Same will happen here. Stop being cheap!)
This spectrum...the airspace that these channels occupy...is a valuable limited resource that (at least theoretically) is owned by the American public and administered through "our" FCC. These companies knew when they applied for the ability to use the bandwidth, that there would be one and only one competitor.
I'm sorry things didn't work out for them and for their investors, but we already gave them protection by licensing a duopoly and we shouldn't reward their collective failures by giving them more by handing them a monopoly. Its not like we don't have other uses for this spectrum.
Let them decide which of the two delivery systems is the best, provide a free or reasonable way for the users of the rejected technology to migrate to the selected one, and give the spectrum back to the real owners so that we can use it either for another technology that is profitable to deliver or reserve it to re-establish a duopoly (should we find more starry-eyed entrepreneurs).
Although many people feel they don't want to have to worry about buying new equipment, I believe that as new equipment becomes available, many adopters of Sat. radio will "upgrade".
I have an S50 unit by Sirius. At some point in the future, I will probably "upgrade" to the new fully portible Stiletto unit. (or a future version of a fully portible unit) Also they may add video services, that would be a reason to upgrade.
I think setting aside a section of frequencies for a future competitor is a good idea, once the companies have merged and rolled out future products. The other thing would be for the merged company to offer a trade in program for older hardware.
I'm looking forward to MLB to go with my NHL, NBA, NASCAR and NFL, not to mention Howard Stern.
let competition flurish.. even with expensive satilites...
Congress should get some panty lube and stop trying to distract the public from bigger issues. Find a way to stop rampant gas price gouging, feed hungry children, work on healthcare, anything with real value.
People should be angry that the congress is wasting time on this crud.
- Lets Deregulate All Of It Shall We
- by sumrzz March 1, 2007 11:15 AM PST
- I PROMISE YOU THAT THIS WILL BE APPROVED.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(20 Comments)THERE ARE TOO MANY GREEDY PEOPLE INVOLVED HERE.
As a Radio Veteran I've seen this time and time again where big radio conglomerates want to buy each other out only to sell out the listener, cut out the individual voices, raise the rates and most significantly fire the employees that got them there. How do I know? I've been in Radio for many years. I know.
I can promise you this, if the federal government allows this to happen to Satellite Radio like it happened to terrestrial radio during the Clinton years with the signing of the telecommunications act, you will see all of the above happening all over again. This time it will be Satellite Radio's turn. And knowing some of these corrupt politicians you'll probably even see a stipulation that WON'T level the playing field for another potential Satellite company to sign on board if the merger is approved.
Trust me...it's all about the almighty buck in the end.
THE LISTENER STARTED COMING IN LAST when the telecommunications act was signed in to
law. What you hear on your terrestrial radio today is TOTAL evidence of that.