Comments on: Senator to propose surveillance of illegal images
Proposal from Sen. John McCain would force Internet providers to report illegal images, even "cartoons."
Proposal from Sen. John McCain would force Internet providers to report illegal images, even "cartoons."
November 24, 2009 4:00 AM PST
November 24, 2009 4:00 AM PST
November 24, 2009 4:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
People getting caught up in MD5 and SHA1 hashes are on the wrong track. The "signature" of a specific image is not something that you simply compare A = B. It is a pyramid encoding of the 2D image in the frequency domain, and a match is simply above a certain threshold, say 90% confidence.
You can take an original image that has had a signature made for it, and compress it, reencode it, resize it, tint it, add noise, text captions, whatever... when the signature is made for THAT image, and then "compared" to the original signature, they will have high spatial correlation and the mangled copy will still get flagged.
Similarly, one cannot construct an image file that has very high 2D color space correlation to another image file without them "looking very similar"... aka, if your picture doesn't look almost identical to a known image with a signature, it simply won't match it.
Modern cpu's can compute a signature for a screen-sized image in a few milliseconds. Building a web service that sends the unknown signature to a server someplace and has IT do the big database task of finding the closest match and reporting it back as FLAG or DONT-FLAG is straightforward.
Of course the threshold for what "matches" can be adjusted to balance the hit detection/false alarm rate that is inherent in any statistical analysis. I would guess any such program if applied to every single web image, (billions?) would start out with something like 98% and see how many hits they get and go from there.
Also, note that video files, while being more computationally intensive to compute are even easier to get good hit_detection/false_alerm rates, because of the extra dimension (t).
Certainly the cpu time and bandwidth overhead requited to check if this a horrible image of a child being exploited is in the noise compared to the time and cost to upload and store the image in the first place.
There is simply no legitimate argument for not doing this that involves time, money or technology.
The only argument, is in regards to constitutionality of a law that makes it illegal to possess a computer file if it can be rendered as a grid of pixels such that a viewer of said pixels might be induced to think impurient thoughts about a minor, real or imagined.
I doubt even the most liberal american would complain if this exposed and convicted dangerous child predators... the gray area comes in when it also destroys the life of the thousands of "relatively" innocent men who unwittingly or otherwise have one or two images on their computer that are deemed illegal. Federal mandatory minumums with a 10 year "internet bump" are going to hurt a lot of people for having possibly maybe thought something once.
The other issue I have is that it will only take a few milliseconds to generate your hash (I am assuming you still use some kind of hash) How long will it take to compare the result with 5 or 10 million other hashes? I guess you could save them up and do them all in one batch at a slow time.
from inadvertently or otherwise downloading an image, provided it
could be analyzed at the source before being downloaded? But of
course that would suppose that the image could legally exist
somewhere. It's all a bit confusing!
~another slave helping your world go round~
by them.
McCain has no issues to campaign with. Zero, zip, nada. So like
every other politician, he's dragging out the old witch hunt fear
mentality.
Trouble is, people are getting tired of hearing it.
yay more snooping, first FBI is allowed to wiretap VoIP communications now ISPs are allowed to look through emails and attatchments indiscrimintantly for child porn! w00t!
What good is a redundant bill that only further ties the hands of the good guys?
You solve a problem by cutting it off at the root. That said... then why is this bill only interested in trimming the branches?
FWIW
other day... more "defending the homeland from the terrorists"
bs. Everybody knows it but nobody will just say it:
The WAR ON TERROR is a SCAM!
It's the GREAT FRAUD of the new century. A MYTH. A LEGEND.
The LIE on which the other lies are built.
911 and other large scale terror attacks (London subway, etc.)
are false flag operations carried out by western intelligence
agencies to mislead the masses and provide a justification for
illegal acts of agression (for war profiteering, oil resources,
power expansion, etc.) around the world, and the creation of a
police state authoritarian dictatorship at home.
These people are not subtle. They are blatant, obvious, smug,
treasonous, ruthless, psychotic, dangerous, and absolutely
predictable. They have nothing but contempt for their fellow
citizens - and the rest of the world for that matter (and they are
preparing to nuke Iran at this very moment!).
who is going to step up?
Forget the media. The corporate media is a mouthpiece for their
newspeak-like rhetoric of deception. Just check out the Libby
trial happening right now. Every reporter in Washington knew
the real story - first hand - but they all mislead the public by
acting like it was some big mystery for over 2 years.
Forget the democrats (who don't even have the balls to be the
republicans they wish they were!).
It's up to us to demand it. loud and clear.
IMPEACHMENT. NOW.
- Chickens
- by jcalex2 February 16, 2007 1:50 PM PST
- Please tell me why NO ONE has the nerve to ask "john mccain" why he is deceiving the very same Americans that prayed for his safe release from captivity.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 4 pages (177 Comments)I have undeniable proof that his word ain`t worth a dam....He Lies!
Jerry Alexander