Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!

Comments on: Senator to propose surveillance of illegal images

Proposal from Sen. John McCain would force Internet providers to report illegal images, even "cartoons."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 4 of 4 pages (177 Comments)
It has already been implemented.
by chip_farquar February 8, 2007 2:50 PM PST
I wrote the code to do this many years ago. It works just fine.

People getting caught up in MD5 and SHA1 hashes are on the wrong track. The "signature" of a specific image is not something that you simply compare A = B. It is a pyramid encoding of the 2D image in the frequency domain, and a match is simply above a certain threshold, say 90% confidence.

You can take an original image that has had a signature made for it, and compress it, reencode it, resize it, tint it, add noise, text captions, whatever... when the signature is made for THAT image, and then "compared" to the original signature, they will have high spatial correlation and the mangled copy will still get flagged.

Similarly, one cannot construct an image file that has very high 2D color space correlation to another image file without them "looking very similar"... aka, if your picture doesn't look almost identical to a known image with a signature, it simply won't match it.

Modern cpu's can compute a signature for a screen-sized image in a few milliseconds. Building a web service that sends the unknown signature to a server someplace and has IT do the big database task of finding the closest match and reporting it back as FLAG or DONT-FLAG is straightforward.

Of course the threshold for what "matches" can be adjusted to balance the hit detection/false alarm rate that is inherent in any statistical analysis. I would guess any such program if applied to every single web image, (billions?) would start out with something like 98% and see how many hits they get and go from there.

Also, note that video files, while being more computationally intensive to compute are even easier to get good hit_detection/false_alerm rates, because of the extra dimension (t).

Certainly the cpu time and bandwidth overhead requited to check if this a horrible image of a child being exploited is in the noise compared to the time and cost to upload and store the image in the first place.

There is simply no legitimate argument for not doing this that involves time, money or technology.

The only argument, is in regards to constitutionality of a law that makes it illegal to possess a computer file if it can be rendered as a grid of pixels such that a viewer of said pixels might be induced to think impurient thoughts about a minor, real or imagined.

I doubt even the most liberal american would complain if this exposed and convicted dangerous child predators... the gray area comes in when it also destroys the life of the thousands of "relatively" innocent men who unwittingly or otherwise have one or two images on their computer that are deemed illegal. Federal mandatory minumums with a 10 year "internet bump" are going to hurt a lot of people for having possibly maybe thought something once.
Reply to this comment
Lets do some simple math.
by ralfthedog February 9, 2007 7:04 AM PST
Lets use your fourier trick (Sounds cool by the way) with a small ISP that handles 100,000 email transactions a day. Lets say that you have a 1% false positive. Unless I am wrong, This little ISP would need to have a human check and compare 1,000 images a day.

The other issue I have is that it will only take a few milliseconds to generate your hash (I am assuming you still use some kind of hash) How long will it take to compare the result with 5 or 10 million other hashes? I guess you could save them up and do them all in one batch at a slow time.
View reply
Image screener for users, too?
by billmosby February 9, 2007 3:11 PM PST
I suppose this technology could also be used to keep web surfers
from inadvertently or otherwise downloading an image, provided it
could be analyzed at the source before being downloaded? But of
course that would suppose that the image could legally exist
somewhere. It's all a bit confusing!
Country founded on Morons
by bmwchild February 8, 2007 5:24 PM PST
This is the dumbest thing I have heard of going after people for looking at cartoons. Come on they are cartoons. If a person cannot tell the difference between Reality and non reality that person needs help. But cartoons COME ON!!every day this country is founded all "stupid rules" we do not need another "stupid rule" real images I understand but cartoons. I hate to admit this but I rather some perv release there pleasure on college rulled paper than end up building it up inside and going after a real child. People need to think about how many rules we are making. Sooon this is going to get to the point where people are not allowed to read book and and just listen to the goverment. GAWD this is so Stupid

~another slave helping your world go round~
Reply to this comment
Not Quite
by Gromit801 February 9, 2007 12:37 PM PST
The country wasn't founded on (by) morons, it's merely being RUN
by them.

McCain has no issues to campaign with. Zero, zip, nada. So like
every other politician, he's dragging out the old witch hunt fear
mentality.

Trouble is, people are getting tired of hearing it.
how old is a cartoon?
by JoeCrow February 9, 2007 12:56 AM PST
how the hell do you tell if a cartoon is a minor or not?

yay more snooping, first FBI is allowed to wiretap VoIP communications now ISPs are allowed to look through emails and attatchments indiscrimintantly for child porn! w00t!
Reply to this comment
Just more redundant red tape
by wbenton February 9, 2007 10:53 AM PST
The current laws already in effect already attempt to do the same thing that this bill proposes...

What good is a redundant bill that only further ties the hands of the good guys?

You solve a problem by cutting it off at the root. That said... then why is this bill only interested in trimming the branches?

FWIW
Reply to this comment
More evidence that the GOP...
by kbd05 February 9, 2007 1:56 PM PST
...is no longer the party that believes in a small Federal gov't. Nope -- Big Brother has slipped out his donkey outfit and now wears an elephant mask.
Reply to this comment
Senator and Posters showing ignorance
by suyts February 9, 2007 4:07 PM PST
The senator wants our ISP to track "illegal" images. IF THE IMAGES ARE ILLEGAL THEN THE IMAGES SHOULD BE BLOCKED AND THE PROVIDERS HUNTED DOWN AND PROCECUTED. But honestly, how are the ISPs supposed to know what images are legal vs. illegal. It simply isn't practical if not impossible to track every image that flies over the internet. Why argue about all the other bs when this legislation has zero chance of being enforced even if it gets passed. I would have thought that the people posting here would have been a little more tech savy than what they are portraying now.
Reply to this comment
Well smart guy..
by Solaris_User February 9, 2007 5:29 PM PST
I need to ask you.. how would they track them? So... you proposing a system that can monitor every file on the internet, and calling this a good thing(tm)?
Slippary Slope
by wjacks1 February 10, 2007 6:18 PM PST
What is next, after authorizing reading of emails and internet? Will phone conversations, what is said in your bedroom next? Moving from a democracy to a police state and all for a few votes. Who gets to define an illegal image? I hope that if this sees the light of day that is tried in court for years to come and finally overturned by reasonable people in the courts. Oops, my bad.
Reply to this comment
So what are you saying ( track you)
by angle.sky February 11, 2007 7:07 AM PST
Are you trying to send a hint that you want to be tracked, Is this a submission of guilt. (tm)
Reply to this comment
Inresponse to (well smart guy) (tm)
by angle.sky February 11, 2007 7:19 AM PST
I think he wants to be tracked.
Reply to this comment
Cool Database ?
by Ragingdemo February 12, 2007 4:27 PM PST
Come on People I can't hear you on this one. When are WE "Little people" going to Stand UP AND ROCK THERE WORLD ? Can you just imagine That Tough Little Guy in the Hanoi Hilton ? And today if Ole G.W.Bush the "Destroyer" was to stop short oh well there goes the little guy. How can One Little white headed old Man go from being an honorable believable POW-VET to a Raving Ranting PRO-WAR PRO-BUSH PRO-HALLIBURTON Al-Queda This Taliban that with some of the most completely absured Propanganda Crap I have ever In My life heard. In fact some of the Hyper Bull that was spelled out in perfectly timed Interviews that the Bush/Cheney McCain Tripod had given was so Absured So Manufactured that I could only shake my head and laugh in utter Humiliation Disgrace and total Disgust Can any of you who still "Honestly" care about the Sovereignty Of Mother Liberty {Mrs America} Still claim to this day That WE were REALLY and TRULY ATTACKED ON 9/11? FOR WHAT? And if you still think that way Can you Help US to understand why after all the Hundreds of thousands of Innocent People Our Military has "Quote" accidently Killed in there Quest for spreading out that "Free Democracy" maybe you can explain Why all these Quote EVIL-DOERS have NOT ATTACKED ONE LOUSY GARBAGE CAN, NOT ONE SUBWAY URINAL STANKIN GARBAGE CAN ? And please if you have Any shame or Disgust left in you do NOT try and say it's Because HomeBoy security Firm is doing there JOB Cause I hate to Be the One to tell you nice people this BUT they could NOT Find there Own ***** with Both hands doing the looking So now We have Five times More Idiots running around loose in the united States with GUNS all swearing they are RAMBO and single handidly are going to save Thar USofA . **** on em . What happened to this country on and before 9/11 was Operation Northwoods PERIOD it was THE only SONG BEING played !!!! All any of you need do is just Check with them nice fellas down at the Council on Foreign relation .
Reply to this comment
finally!
by snarez February 12, 2007 8:58 PM PST
It made me ill to hear Obama talk about the 911 attacks the
other day... more "defending the homeland from the terrorists"
bs. Everybody knows it but nobody will just say it:
The WAR ON TERROR is a SCAM!
It's the GREAT FRAUD of the new century. A MYTH. A LEGEND.
The LIE on which the other lies are built.
911 and other large scale terror attacks (London subway, etc.)
are false flag operations carried out by western intelligence
agencies to mislead the masses and provide a justification for
illegal acts of agression (for war profiteering, oil resources,
power expansion, etc.) around the world, and the creation of a
police state authoritarian dictatorship at home.

These people are not subtle. They are blatant, obvious, smug,
treasonous, ruthless, psychotic, dangerous, and absolutely
predictable. They have nothing but contempt for their fellow
citizens - and the rest of the world for that matter (and they are
preparing to nuke Iran at this very moment!).

who is going to step up?

Forget the media. The corporate media is a mouthpiece for their
newspeak-like rhetoric of deception. Just check out the Libby
trial happening right now. Every reporter in Washington knew
the real story - first hand - but they all mislead the public by
acting like it was some big mystery for over 2 years.

Forget the democrats (who don't even have the balls to be the
republicans they wish they were!).

It's up to us to demand it. loud and clear.
IMPEACHMENT. NOW.
GOP warns Draw cartoons go to Prison ?
by Ragingdemo February 14, 2007 10:10 AM PST
Dear Friend's: Can you believe the Bell's On this "Little Man" I think his stay at the Hanoi Hilton must have done irreversable dane bramage. Not only is this "Loose Cannon" wandering around as an elected official with power But Now He want ISPs to inform On Who is creating WMD Cartoons ? ARE WE NUTS FOR ALLOWING THIS SOB to even be allowed outside the Hospital. THEN WILL SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME To understand at what point are these Crazy SOBs going to STOP THIS INSANITY ? What One must ask themselves is Are they Blowing all this Wacky Tabacky Smoke to keep We Little People Off center and busy chasing are shadows to keep Us from focusing on the Impeacment process and the Criminal charges that are being put together against the Bush / Cheney Boyz Club ? All I can say folks Is I AM DEEPLY DISGUSTED AND ASHAMED TO BE AMERICAN AT THIS POINT IN TIME, Not because I hate My country But rather Because I'm ashamed at the Lie's told and the Gross Fraud they Perpitrated on the American people just so they could drag our youth into War to kill innocent Iraqis. They knowingly Manufactured Evidence to Create the Need for this Bogus War and because so many of the Senators they used to sign off on this War were so Bullied into Signing they Never bothered to question even One Piece Of Ficticious evidence. In fact they were so scared they would Be called Traders or even Terrorist's that they all lined up Behind Old G.W.Bush which We now know for Fact was the Biggest Single Mistake anyone could make . So Now We have the GOP wanting to Imprison Anybody who Draws a Coartoon They DON'T LIKE ? Can any of you guess who this remindes Us Of, How about the Old USSR and the KGB. Make's you wander What's Next !
Reply to this comment
Chickens
by jcalex2 February 16, 2007 1:50 PM PST
Please tell me why NO ONE has the nerve to ask "john mccain" why he is deceiving the very same Americans that prayed for his safe release from captivity.
I have undeniable proof that his word ain`t worth a dam....He Lies!
Jerry Alexander
Reply to this comment
Showing 4 of 4 pages (177 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement