Comments on: In Washington, a Net protector or predator?

Mark Foley, who resigned from Congress over sex-chat allegations, touted himself as its leading defender of children on the Net.

[Kiyomizu]

Sick Politicians

It's just sick, just sick to think a pedophile represents the people in Congress. And to think this one represents defenseless children is even more sickening.

It's like watching a fictional criminal tv show that potrays fictional characters with an inplausible plot of congress people living deceitful and treacherous lives.

But yet, it's come to life. It's reality. It's fiction turned into nonfiction. How many politicians and people in power are deranged? How many of them will continue to commit crimes? How many of them will get away with it?

Maybe it's time to tighten the bolts and put severe criminal charges on these people with power. How can society function with all these sick people on the loose?

Wow... so many questions that will never be answered truthfully. But one question begs for an immediate reply, one that this excongressman has trampled on and forever changed the way children will look towards their politicians for security.

Who do we trust?

[katamari]

Confused.

I don't disagree with anything you've said (I agree with the general moral of it all). But, a couple things confusing me:

1) Why do you distinguish the difference between "politicians" and human beings, standard members of society, or what we all call "normal"? I'm trying to figure out why you think a politician who's a paedo is "worse" than someone who isn't a politician.

2) Lose, not loose. Lose means to take away, remove -- loose means easily accessible, nearly ajar, or open-ended. (The popularity of this supposed "typo" overwhelms the possibility that it's simply a typo -- there are too many people these days who make this mistake for me to believe everyone's typoing it...)

[Methuss]

Predators

Best place to hide is in plain view of all.

[marileev]

powerful taking advantage

Kiyomizu, yes you make the right distinction in both your posts about how power gives you privy and influence -- sadly, even on young impressionable boys. I'm sure these parents trusted that their kids would be safe as pages with politicians like Foley who had put predator legislation through. Then to find out that actions, like that predator legislation by Foley were merely ploys, a distraction from his perverted ways http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=108

[Too Old For IT]

OTOH: Ruth Bader Ginsberg Rant

If we had followed Ruth Bader Ginsberg back in the 70's and lowered the age of consent to 12, and made posession of small amounts of reefer legal, law enforcement could fight REAL crime, there would be less political mud to sling, and parents of teenagers would have to take a little responsibility for the actions of thier spawn.

[cnutsucks]

The U.S. Govt is the Real Threat to America

They spout off about video games, movies, music and everything else being bad for citizens. YET these
http://www.teckmagazine.com/content/view/603/43/
are the same folks who protect/cover up each other's pedophilia behavior and look out for the best interest for themselves and their lobbyists.
Corruption is at the core of this country.

[ALPICH]

Very Sad

I use to as a teenager up until 24 years of age watch porn.
Nothing sick just your average heterosexual porn. This was
really bad for my relationship with my wife who I married at age
23. I still desire porn and still want to view it. Thing is I also
hate it. I have such a passion against Porn and what it does to
people in the industry and to those who use it. So what this
person did was really sick, so sick i don?t want to mention it, but
as to being one who publicly is against it and privately is
struggling with it... well we are all doing this to some level. I
guess what I am saying is that we should not be shocked that it
was the one speaking the loudest who had the problem.

[umbrae]

This is why...

you need to be suspicious when politicians start pushing hard for new laws that are obsessive. Sure, Republicans want to "Protect your children" alright. Thats why they covered up Foley's activities.

[rcrusoe]

This confirms my theory

I've believed for years that anyone who will do what is necessary to be elected to high public office, is not the kind of person you want in the job.

[gary0107]

Please don't use this alleged crime for polical gain

Just once I would like to see congress deal with an important issue like this one without using it as an opportunity to bash the other side.

We need our representatives, democrats and republicans, to be able to work together not constantly fight one another.

Those who will use this for political gain, no matter the party, just need to go.

That's why the 2 party system....

has to go! It has been nothing but a distraction and
is becoming very unproductive. With more choices, you don't have to vote for the lessor of two evils.

[bemenaker]

Is it political gain?

When one party is trying to cover it's own a$$ instead of punishing someone? I don't vote party lines, I don't belong to a party, I am an independant. But, seeing the mounting evidence that the GOP hid this for fear of damage, instead of coming out harsly against it, (the least damaging approach) is utterly repulsive and inexcusable. Anyone who had a hand in hiding this, should be tossed as well, regardless of party, clout, or affiliation.

[Penguinisto]

Too Late :(

...at least according to nearly every talking-head show on nearly every cable news station...

/P

[Mentor397]

nothing will surprise me

I'm not aruging, I wish it were true, but there's no way that politicians are not going to use this for political gain. I wish I could say something positive about the United States political system but I can't at this point.

[My-Self]

Will we use it ? Hell yes !

How long have Repugnicans used and abused Bill clinton's sex affair ?

Now we have both a 'Family values' Repugnican who turns out to be a pedophile and the whole party that sided with him (including J. Dennis Hastert, the Repugnican Speaker of the House) in an attempt to hide the facts.

Will we use it ? Hell yes !

[imacpwr]

"I did not have sexual relationships with that page..!"

One Democratic President denies having consensual sex with
another adult and the Republicans want him impeached. Want to
bet those same Republicans today are now trying to sweep this one
under the rug..!

*note: posted by non-partisan poster

[David Arbogast]

Big Difference

Big difference here... first of all, Foley hasn't been accused of touching the page. But lets get real, shall we? When news broke, Foley RESIGNED. When Lewinski news broke, President Clinton lied to the people, then lied in court, was convicted of perjury, and never lost his job. Foley is out, as he should be. Clinton got a pass for [i]illegally[/i] cheating on his wife, in the white house, on our dime.

[jimetattooist]

this is flagrant abuse

of power, in that here we have a supposed " leader of the nation " actually using it's power to impose it's self on thoser than it is....
i suppose this a member of NAMBLA as well?
seems to fit the general profile.......

[jimetattooist]

this is flagrant abuse

of power, in that here we have a supposed " leader of the nation " actually using it's power to impose it's self on those weaker than it is....
i suppose this a member of NAMBLA as well?
seems to fit the general profile.......
sorry if double posted, i typo'ed, lol

[WJeansonne]

People in Glass Houses Shouldn't Throw Stones

Let us not forgot about two other unfortunate events in the 1980's that involved both a Democrat and Republican actually having sex with the pages! They were just censored and the Page system was supposed to have been fixed. Moreover, the Republican congressman resigned as he should have, but the Democrat went to serve out his term, which is dispicable to the say the least. The Democrats as usual are hypocrits. They are trying to trump up the charges to involve the speaker of the House, as well as other Republican leaders. So they should keep on digging on go back to the 1980's when they were supposed to have corrected the problem with libido driven politicians. So the Democrats should be careful with this charge, since this happened on their watch too and long ago.

[Mystigo]

Well said.

You are right. Caligula slept with his sister for goodness sakes.
Nobody gets upset about that anymore. Since there is ample
precedent for this kind of thing, we should definitely give Foley a
pass, and simply not worry about the pages or the cover up or
anything else. Excellent point.

[bemenaker]

Hypocrit?

How about the GOP trying to impeach a Dem President for consensual sex, and now they are trying to hide and protect a member who is trying to solicit a minor? Why did they vote to not send this to the ethics comittee.

Talk about glass houses and throwing stones. If you are going to start waving the hypocrisy flag around, better take a good look first.

[jezzur]

You are a disgrace

So, something like this happens, and all you morons can do is say... the democrats did this, the republicans did that!!!

You are a disgrace.

The sole concern here should be

1 To ensure justice is done.
2 Ensure no children are abused, by ensuring that systems are changed and reporting is mandatory

Further we should consider again whether our faith in state and church is justified. There are so many examples worldwide of this behaviour, from political and religious leaders, that one must wonder whether they really have anyone's interest at heart except themselves and their institutions.

And if this moves you only to talk about politics? You are a disgrace.

[Hoser McMoose]

He who yells loudest...

This shouldn't be a big surprise really, it so often seems that the person complaining about something the loudest is the one that is secretely hiding something... a sort of over-compensation to try and hide a part of themselves that they are uncomfortable with or embarrased about. It's like the classic example of the closet homesexual guy who is constantly gay-bashing and saying the most explicit comments about sex with women because he doesn't want anyone to know that he's gay.

It's for reasons like this that I'm always wary any time I hear someone championing a cause to extreme levels instead of taking a balanced and logical approach. Usually it's a sign that there is some kind of hidden agenda or secret they want protected.

[james.grimes]

Exactly

Thy who yells the loudest does have something to hide. Its just like with President Bill Clinton; he is now working on humaritan causes because he barely did anything about it during his eight years as president of the United States of America.

[jeepwonder]

child predator?

I dont' get it. The boys were over the age of consent. He didn't
force anyone into anything they declined. No one can show
anything beyond him sitting at his computer having consentual
conversations. It was the parents that complained, not the former
pages. And the parents didn't want it to go any further! So, why
the stories, especially now that he apologized and resigned.
Sounds like the democrats are doing this for politics, they didnt'
complaian when Gerry Studds did more than just talk....

[alegr]

Age of consent

The age of consent depends on the other person's age. If one person is adult (over 18), sex with underage (under 18) may be considered statutory rape.

[PzkwVIb]

Foley position

Was as a "superior" to the pages, so unwanted advances could be sexual harassment, and face it, the letters were kind of creepy. But you are right if the page's were of age and consenting then nothing "technically" wrong occurred. But, as a hypocritical champion of the children he set himself up for a fall.

Politicians need to stop obsessing about sex and children and stop quoting completely bogus numbers about some how many children are solicited online. There is no unbiased source for these numbers. No rigorous statistical survey exists.

In fact, as most politicians are too blindingly stupid as to actually understand the Internet, they should totally refrain from making any Internet specific laws. The current base of laws and common sense should sufficiently cover criminal behavior, whether it occurs in person or on the Internet.

[duggerdm]

Read the article .

"The transcripts appear to show how Foley, 52, engaged in sexually explicit discussions with minors." Minor generally means under the age of consent.

[Mystigo]

Age of Consent

I am not sure that it has been established anywhere, whether the
pages involved were over the age of consent. Since none of them
have been personally identified, this remains an open issue. It
may also depend on the home states of the individuals involved,
or on the states in which the contacts occurred. My guess is,
that all the incidents to date, may have been technically legal.
The age of consent is 16 in most places (although notably 18 in
Florida which is where one of the pages is said to be from, and
18 in California where an incident is inferred).

However, at least one exchange involved Foley offering to obtain
alcohol for someone who was almost certainly under the age of
21. If he followed through with the offer, that is indeed a crime,
and depending on the frequency of occurrences, can lead to
some serious penalties.

[amyedwards]

Middle age v. Minor

I agree with most of what you stated; however, as a parent of a 16 yr old daughter who had a 42yr old man (who she babysat on many occasions) solicit her for sexual contact, immoral. I am appalled that a grown man who is by nature an authority figure come onto a minor, has not committed a crime in a state where the consenting age is 16. There is or rather should be a significant difference in a minor's reasoning versus a grown adult wit immense life experience to draw from...where is the protection in a case like this? There is none.

[declan00]

age of consent

The age of consent in Florida is, last I checked, 18 years old for adult-child sex.

While it's hardly clear what happened here, we can't assume that all the pages were "legal."

[imacpwr]

ALL politicians are sleaze balls.. period

They all stand up on podiums and declare how dirty their opponites
are when in reality they ALL are nothing more than a bunch of
sleaze balls with thier own self serving agenda. Case in point, what
better way to pick-up young boys than to be the head of a youth
protectionist group..!! Now THAT's a self serving agenda..!!!

[Too Old For IT]

Give the Democrats Back Their Power Because it is Theirs

So Mark Foley wanted to screw a page. This is any different than the average low-life congress critter wanting the screw the taxpayer?

Leaking it now is nothing more than a ploy to convince the sheep in the voting booth to give the Democrats Back Their Power Because it is Rightfully Only Theirs.

Only when the sheep are duly shorn will they realize their mistake ... maybe not even then.

[Mystigo]

Shorn Indeed

When it comes to civil rights, it already feels a little drafty in here...

[qwerty75]

Funny stuff

People who rail against something very hard are usually doing it out of guilt or to try to keep some odd idea of moralistic high ground. For another sort of recent case look at Rush Limbaugh.

I wouldn't be surprised if James Dobson-the moralistic, fascist, homophopic, focus on the family idjit-was busted with a bunch of coke and 8 teenage male prostitutes in some seedy motel room.

[lingsun]

Democrats trying to sway election again

The Democrats and their accomplices in the media are again pulling an October surprise and trying to sway the election. Foly never had sex with that intern, unlike Bill Clinton. A few years ago the demorats leaked lies about Bush having a DWI conviction.

[My-Self]

Swift Veterans for "truth"

Remember the so called Swift Veterans for "truth" ?

Which side tried to sway the election with unfair tactics ?

I understand your frustration, but, sorry, turning the tables on Repugnicans is long overdue.