Comments on: Congress targets social-networking sites
Lawmakers have been trying to get ISPs to retain data on customers. Now Congress is turning to sites like MySpace.
Lawmakers have been trying to get ISPs to retain data on customers. Now Congress is turning to sites like MySpace.
December 28, 2009 6:10 PM PST
December 28, 2009 6:00 PM PST
December 28, 2009 2:39 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Child porn is and has been a issue on the net. Many ISP used to shut down hacker boards and leave up pedofile disscussions(AOL).
Lets make a law, where if you child posts pics of her cleavage online the parents get fined. Or lets make a law where every over reaching law kicked back by the Supreme court costs the Senators who voted for it there yearly salary. Those who put the bill forward must step down.
WE ARE TOUGH ON CRIME right before the election. So we are after terrorists and Kiddy porn. But what if I post a picture of a post leaf and that becomes illeagle. Will you use these records to come after me?
What if I post what a sad state I think this country is in. Will you then follow me around and track me like the Feds did in the 70's to pop icons? The terrorists then were Communists... Ohhh NOOOO not communists.
Al Queda vists Bush shortly before we are attacked
Fact!
We kill Sadamn Husein but not Bin Laden
Fact!
Oil Companies have prices up to $4.00 a gallon in some places and report record profits.
Fact!
The internet as we know it is about to change
Fact!
Illeagle aliens are crossing our borders in numbers so high local border residents are threatening to shoot them.
Fact!
National Guard is deployed with no power to detain or stop illeagle alien crossing
Fact
Fast Food jobs are considered manufacturing jobs thanks to Bush administration(don't trust the numbers guys)
Fact!
Is mySpace really worth my tax dollars? Are Senators really that out of touch? Sad to say, most americans are fat dumb idiots who watch TV every night and can't seem to think for themselves. They do not call it programming for nothing guys.
Use this concern to sit down with your children and talk to them about options and how to make decisions. If the government has to keep them safe in this situation, who will keep them safe in other situations?
Pat
http://pat.powerfulintentions.com
. . . i wish people weren't dumb
easier to catch those terrorists and child hunters.
Sexual predators have been around just as long doing the same things, the only difference is it's easier to take a picture, it's easier to share a picture. The methods to abuse haven't changed much, now they meet them on the net instead of at the local drugstore.
Children hide things from their parents, even when they know they shouldn't, they do. I'm sure if you think about it, you did the same when you were young. I really don't think the government can fix it.
They spend billions fighting drugs, which if they legalized they could control and make money from. Seems they didn't learn anything from prohibition.
I'm amazed at their stupidity.
point where it's extremely abusive - especially on the Internet.
Things that wouldn't be allowed in public - that would probably
land people in court - appear to be "OK" and "Acceptable" on the
Internet. Personally, I don't like that.
I'm sorry, if you're not doing anything wrong, there's no problem
with your IP address being tracked. Why should you care if
you're not doing anything wrong? I just don't get it....
The government's not out to crack down on people who are
engaging in legitimate adult to adult activities, they're out to nail
sexual predators, terrorists, etc.
I used to have the exact same attitude that many people here
have - and I'm sure I'll be attacked for thinking it's OK - but I'm
sorry, as I get older it just seems like it's not that big a deal. If
you're not doing anything wrong (i.e. - breaking the law), this
requirement simply isn't a big deal and will have no effect on
you.
Charles Whealton
Chuck Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
(I haven't the link but some crafty person could find it easy.) CNet published an article a while back on educating children with regard to the information they give out online.
One fellow found out he was passed over for a prestigious law firm possition because of comments he'd made years ago as a child in school.
I believe it was a student who did not get accepted to university for comments he'd made in anger over one of his highschool teachers.
Perhaps there there should be a safe harbour type "children's" internet where records are expunged at age 16 along with access rights.
But they are wrong to try to take the place of parents. Let our children's parents do their job; instill morals, a sense of place and perspective, a value of self, and monitor their Internet access and activity.
Don't try to legislate solutions to a lack of parenting; encourage parenting. Find and proscecute lawbreakers, encourage web site designers to provide warnings and disclaimers as part of their presentation. But don't try to control one of the greatest inventions ever, the Internet, a fount of useful, and useless, information, entertainment,and communication. The Internet and all it's capability offers THE greatest opportunity to overcome ignarance, spread democracy throughout the world, and so much more.We should be encouraging more, not less, participation. Isn't it amazing that in spite of Congress' best efforts, most of the time the people get it right anyway?
Our founders rightly determined that free speech was the absolute foundatrion of our democracy, and specifically designed the Constitution to reflect this paramount building block of freedom. Well-meaning but ill-advised legislation to censor and control the Internet defeats one of our greatest opportunities to make the world a better place.
Diogenes
But they are wrong to try to take the place of parents. Let our children's parents do their job; instill morals, a sense of place and perspective, a value of self, and monitor their Internet access and activity.
Don't try to legislate solutions to a lack of parenting; encourage parenting. Find and proscecute lawbreakers, encourage web site designers to provide warnings and disclaimers as part of their presentation. But don't try to control one of the greatest inventions ever, the Internet, a fount of useful, and useless, information, entertainment,and communication. The Internet and all it's capability offers THE greatest opportunity to overcome ignarance, spread democracy throughout the world, and so much more.We should be encouraging more, not less, participation. Isn't it amazing that in spite of Congress' best efforts, most of the time the people get it right anyway?
Our founders rightly determined that free speech was the absolute foundation of our democracy, and specifically designed the Constitution to reflect this paramount building block of freedom. Well-meaning but ill-advised legislation to censor and control the Internet defeats one of our greatest opportunities to make the world a better place.
Diogenes
http://www.techknowcafe.com/content/view/552/44/
You can't go out there and fine a parent because their kid takes a picture of their "cleaveg" as you said.
More than 70% of H.S students have had sex before the age of 18. So under your theory looks like about 70% of parents need to be fined? Good luck on that on buddy...
I agree parents need to be better role models, but this is only a by-product of a even bigger problem. Parents aren't at the home enough because their working their ***** off and barely making it per month.
But this is about myspace and not an agenda...
I don't mind myspace keeping IP Addresses, I don't think it invades pricacy. I would mind if they kept what you said, where you said it etc... I definitely want to crack down on predators, but not hamper my free liberties at the same time. I don't want to be punished because some moron out there is sick in the head.
I disagree in that I do not want to give up liberties that nearly every member in my family has fought for to keep. When you start giving up liberties, is when you start to give up your inherit freedoms.
Its like the gas analogy.
Gas here 6 years ago was about $1.90. Then it show up to $2.25.. everyone was pissed. Then it dipped down to $2.00.. everyone was happy. A few years passed and it skyrocked to $2.60.. people were pissed again. Then it dipped back down to $2.30.. people were happy.
What the normal person doesn't realize is your happy that gas really went up $.40.
Gas goes up $3.60 here and people go INSANE. Then it drops back down to $3.00.. people quite up. Eventhough in the last few years it goes from $2.30 to $3.00.
Point...? You give up one liberty get pissed, but then try to justify it. So then another liberty is taken away.. you get pissed.. but heck its to fight terriorism. Then another liberty, then another liberty.. and so on and so on and so on.
When does it stop...? Answer.. you start taking away freedoms.. it doesn't.
I disagree in that I do not want to give up liberties that nearly every member in my family has fought for to keep. When you start giving up liberties, is when you start to give up your inherit freedoms.
Its like the gas analogy.
Gas here 6 years ago was about $1.90. Then it show up to $2.25.. everyone was pissed. Then it dipped down to $2.00.. everyone was happy. A few years passed and it skyrocked to $2.60.. people were pissed again. Then it dipped back down to $2.30.. people were happy.
What the normal person doesn't realize is your happy that gas really went up $.40.
Gas goes up $3.60 here and people go INSANE. Then it drops back down to $3.00.. people quite up. Eventhough in the last few years it goes from $2.30 to $3.00.
Point...? You give up one liberty get pissed, but then try to justify it. So then another liberty is taken away.. you get pissed.. but heck its to fight terriorism. Then another liberty, then another liberty.. and so on and so on and so on.
When does it stop...? Answer.. you start taking away freedoms.. it doesn't.
- Something Needs to be Done
- by JJ_Wilde July 12, 2006 2:13 AM PDT
- It's good to know that congress is targeting SOMETHING. I was beginning to think that they had no idea what they were doing. Now we have at least a significant indication that they are performing clowns.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(31 Comments)