Comments on: Terrorism invoked in ISP snooping proposal
Attorney general said Internet providers must retain records of Americans' activities to help in terrorism fight, CNET News.com has learned.
Attorney general said Internet providers must retain records of Americans' activities to help in terrorism fight, CNET News.com has learned.
January 4, 2010 5:54 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:38 PM PST
January 4, 2010 4:28 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
their arguments have been.
So far, the government has used past powers granted to "protect
us from terrorists" to do virtually everything BUT go after
terrorists.
The latest NSA phone tracking is going after journalists.
Apparently all journalists (that speak out against the
administration) are terrorists.
This is YET ANOTHER ABUSE OF POWER by this administration.
They use fear to force capitulation.
Enough is enough!
We should never, ever let them take our guns away from us. When that starts to take place, then we know that a police state is fully in place and they will control us through a dictatorship that even Hitler would envy.
Viet Vet Kripto
their arguments have been.
So far, the government has used past powers granted to "protect
us from terrorists" to do virtually everything BUT go after
terrorists.
The latest NSA phone tracking is going after journalists.
Apparently all journalists (that speak out against the
administration) are terrorists.
This is YET ANOTHER ABUSE OF POWER by this administration.
They use fear to force capitulation.
Enough is enough!
We should never, ever let them take our guns away from us. When that starts to take place, then we know that a police state is fully in place and they will control us through a dictatorship that even Hitler would envy.
Viet Vet Kripto
Most Americans agree...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/12/AR2006051200375.html
NON issue.
Most Americans agree...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/12/AR2006051200375.html
NON issue.
What can we learn from this? The government is us. It's acting out our worst sides. If we the people weren't scared sheep, greedy and power-hungry, entitled to stomp the earth for our comforts, we couldn't have a government that shows all these appalling traits. We have met the enemy, and he is us.
What can we learn from this? The government is us. It's acting out our worst sides. If we the people weren't scared sheep, greedy and power-hungry, entitled to stomp the earth for our comforts, we couldn't have a government that shows all these appalling traits. We have met the enemy, and he is us.
child porn
adult porn
"terrorists"
"enemy combatants"
medical marijuana
hemp growers
whistleblowers
leakers
Viet Vet
child porn
adult porn
"terrorists"
"enemy combatants"
medical marijuana
hemp growers
whistleblowers
leakers
Viet Vet
What ever happened to "Give me Liberty or Give me DEATH!!"
No one in OUR Government ever get's called on this wire tapping program. Did everyone suddenly forget that it was a failure to communicate between government agencies, not the inability to wire tap without a warrant that let the 9-11 hijakers pass unnoticed?
What ever happened to "Give me Liberty or Give me DEATH!!"
No one in OUR Government ever get's called on this wire tapping program. Did everyone suddenly forget that it was a failure to communicate between government agencies, not the inability to wire tap without a warrant that let the 9-11 hijakers pass unnoticed?
1) If the govt is looking to match dial up sign on to assigned IP address, well, that's already logged and retained. No big issue there.
2) If the govt is asking for a record of any and all online activity while connected, then again no worries there. Why?
Simple:
A) Its unenforcable. Think about the amount of logging that would have to occur and then the database retrival. The cost and size would have a negative impact on your ISP's ability to provide service.
B) Who exactly must retain what? Does Sprint have to retain the traffic of their ISP subscribers or resellers of bandwidth? In addition to that ISP tracking their customers?
C) Does this mean that these ISPs are not considered common carriers?
The point and bottom line is that those making the decisions do not understand the technology and have not taken the time to think things through.
And no, the US today is not 1933 Germany.
The big difference is that in today's world, the threat is real. And of course, the US today does not think about the problem before attempting to apply a knee jerked patch to try and fix it.
With respect to the article, its sad that the author tries to tie this back in to the Telco's opening up their call logs to the US Govt. Again this issue has nothing to do with that.
The year is 2006....technology is a weapon used by the bad guys whenever possible.
True enough but the threat is NOT from the American people. This administration doesn't seem to get that.
>The big difference is that in today's world, the threat is real.
FACT: There is no want to guarantee we won't be attacked again.
That is the cost of living in a free society. What is happening is
that our gov't has decided to remove those freedoms in order to
protect us. But again, we will ALWAYS be open to an attack.
If this administration was TRULY interested in protecting
America, it wouldn't have gone into Iraq, instead -- it would
have focused all its attention on finding Bin Laden and if they
were truly interested in stopping terrorism, they would first
focus on improving security on everything shipped into America.
This ploy by Gonzales is nothing more than phishing expedition.
Look how they're using the NSA phone tracking, to go after
journalists that have opposing views. Yeah, they're the threat
(please!).
Your comments suggest that you're willing to place your
freedom in the place of the water and watch it is slowly boiled
away. Like the frog story, the water heats up slowly -- so we
won't notice.
Remember, the gov't already knew about Bin Laden, the
terrorists and their plan -- and either didn't or couldn't stop
them before. NO, the "T" word was used to instill fear to seek
capitulation by the masses that don't know better.
1) If the govt is looking to match dial up sign on to assigned IP address, well, that's already logged and retained. No big issue there.
2) If the govt is asking for a record of any and all online activity while connected, then again no worries there. Why?
Simple:
A) Its unenforcable. Think about the amount of logging that would have to occur and then the database retrival. The cost and size would have a negative impact on your ISP's ability to provide service.
B) Who exactly must retain what? Does Sprint have to retain the traffic of their ISP subscribers or resellers of bandwidth? In addition to that ISP tracking their customers?
C) Does this mean that these ISPs are not considered common carriers?
The point and bottom line is that those making the decisions do not understand the technology and have not taken the time to think things through.
And no, the US today is not 1933 Germany.
The big difference is that in today's world, the threat is real. And of course, the US today does not think about the problem before attempting to apply a knee jerked patch to try and fix it.
With respect to the article, its sad that the author tries to tie this back in to the Telco's opening up their call logs to the US Govt. Again this issue has nothing to do with that.
The year is 2006....technology is a weapon used by the bad guys whenever possible.
True enough but the threat is NOT from the American people. This administration doesn't seem to get that.
>The big difference is that in today's world, the threat is real.
FACT: There is no want to guarantee we won't be attacked again.
That is the cost of living in a free society. What is happening is
that our gov't has decided to remove those freedoms in order to
protect us. But again, we will ALWAYS be open to an attack.
If this administration was TRULY interested in protecting
America, it wouldn't have gone into Iraq, instead -- it would
have focused all its attention on finding Bin Laden and if they
were truly interested in stopping terrorism, they would first
focus on improving security on everything shipped into America.
This ploy by Gonzales is nothing more than phishing expedition.
Look how they're using the NSA phone tracking, to go after
journalists that have opposing views. Yeah, they're the threat
(please!).
Your comments suggest that you're willing to place your
freedom in the place of the water and watch it is slowly boiled
away. Like the frog story, the water heats up slowly -- so we
won't notice.
Remember, the gov't already knew about Bin Laden, the
terrorists and their plan -- and either didn't or couldn't stop
them before. NO, the "T" word was used to instill fear to seek
capitulation by the masses that don't know better.
Also, if Europe is doing it, why the hell aren't we avoiding it like the plague? When did it become fashionable in this country to follow Europe's lead?
- It figures...
- by J_Satch May 31, 2006 5:37 AM PDT
- ...that Comcast would so feverishly lead the charge to kiss the government's ass and gleefully hand over anything asked of them.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 4 pages (292 Comments)Also, if Europe is doing it, why the hell aren't we avoiding it like the plague? When did it become fashionable in this country to follow Europe's lead?