Comments on: Democrats lose House vote on Net neutrality
In vote largely along party lines, Democratic politicians lose effort to have FCC regulate "neutrality" on the Net.
In vote largely along party lines, Democratic politicians lose effort to have FCC regulate "neutrality" on the Net.
November 24, 2009 7:47 AM PST
November 24, 2009 7:38 AM PST
November 24, 2009 7:12 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
You will lose in November. You have forced GOP people of goodwill to do the unthinkable and cross over to vote for the opposition party. It disgusts me that you have ruined a once honorable party, and your actions are patently un-American.
thing to do was kill it! The ONLY thing worse than "no bill" would
have been a bad one, and this thing would have created loopholes
for decades to come. Decades? Hell. We'd have NEVER recovered
from it.
Go back to the drawing boards and get it right and it'll pass.
pawning off yet another false front. Why can't you all just be
yourselves instead of posting deceitful avatars? Is your message so
lousy that you have to pretend to be something you're not?
This was a lousy, poorly written bill.
http://espellahumanzee.blogspot.com/ for real conservatives.
keep up the fight; there's more money going demo for 2008 election campaigns; just check with the Republican Convention allocation figures for hot topic into the cheneybushinc.com.
Latte Grande, please and a slice.
He's doing nothing on immigration, although he claims to have deported 6 million people, somehow he doesn't believe we can round up the other 12 and will not protect the border at all...but somehow thinks we can setup a democracy in Iraq with no problem? If we can't round up some illegals, how can we rebuild a nation and re-educate whole cultures?
They are being idiots with this internet bill as well.
Now they are investigation gas prices. For cryin out loud, you have a war in Iraq, Iran rattling the saber, no new refineries since 1972, only 2 of 25 Gulf Coast refineries operating, Nigerian oil mostly shut down, and 100 oil rigs destroyed by hurricanes and Venezuela rattling the saber too. Oil prices are half what they are in Europe. Get over it. Start building refineries and drilling if you want the prices to drop and investing alternative fuels.
It's not that I support the Democrats who want to tax everything and run and cower everytime someone threatens us, but a message needs to be sent and I will send it.
Republicans will lose big time next elections. Trust me.
What a fake. First and foremost... Stop trying
to mislead the public with statments like
"I'm voting Democrat from now on.." I've not ever
even heard this from any one on my side of the fence. You Libs... get carried away. It's sick.
The argument THEN becomes, company A should pay the same amount for 2 six-packs, that company B pays for 1 six-pack. DOesn't seem as good an argument to have a 1-size-fits-all pricing structure, now does it ?
Sounds like Company B might as well buy 2 six-packs, even if they WASTE some - they don't pay anymore, do they. In the end, if there is a single price on bandwidth - it's just us consumers that WILL eventually end up paying more for the waste.
The net IS neutral. What the Dems want, is to eliminate rights and freedoms by dictating how much you pay and how much companies can charge, and how those companies can structure their service.
The net is free.
The net is neutral.
What a fake. First and foremost... Stop trying
to mislead the public with statments like
yours. You telecom lobbyists and House reps... get carried away. It's sick.
Government dictating pricing structures for Internet service has nothing to do with freedom, and reeks of communist-like control of the free market.
Pricing for services offered by US companies should be dictated by US companies.
Its amazing to me how the anti-government liberals whine and complain about government abuses and percieved failures... and then argue that we need to hand MORE CONTROL of our free markets to the government. What a joke.
the Internet deserves to be "free," as in speech. And this victory is just another win in the fight to preserve that freedom.
Any company that spent the money to build THEIR OWN network, should have the right to charge what they deem a fair price for the services they offer. Don't like it? Find a new provider. The Internet was NOT built on taxpayer dollars - it was built through enormous contributions to private networks. The "Internet" merely connects them all together.
- I believe the internet should be "OPEN" not closed
- by btalex1990 May 2, 2006 10:05 PM PDT
- I think these Greedy Senseless Money Makers now want to destroy our Freedom Of Speech and force us to pay more money. Heck I think the reason why so much trouble and bad stuff happening anymore is Love Of Money.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(23 Comments)Love of Money is the reason why theres lots of murders, lobbying, bank robberies, junk going on like cheating prices (Like gas gouging).
Love of Money is the reason why the average man might not afford medical.
Love of Money is the reason why hard working people go homeless.
Love of Money is the reason why there are porn, drugs, and other illegal activities.
and The Love of Money is the reason why our Earth is polluted, and why we might go more quickly into a Ice Age.
ISPs keep our internet open. If you do I will stay a customer of your service. If you want it all controlled and force the Average Poor Man to pay more money I will quit faster then you say bye bye customer. Now I have the right to cancel service. So I will quit until you say the internet is open again then I will gladly pay fees for getting online