Comments on: Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill
Instead of reforming the controversial DMCA, the U.S. government seems poised to expand it in a sweeping proposal.
Instead of reforming the controversial DMCA, the U.S. government seems poised to expand it in a sweeping proposal.
November 24, 2009 2:59 PM PST
November 24, 2009 2:52 PM PST
November 24, 2009 2:29 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Plain and simple..its reach people trying to get richer, by taking money from the poor people and the people that are capabaly of seeing past the crap the goverment wants the people of what used to be a great country, to believe.
I dont steal from the poor to better myself...thats why i am democrat. I hate H.Clinton and have no want what so ever to give all my money away to deadbeats. So dont even bother coming back with that crap. come up with a better defense. I want what is best for the people and Republicans ARENT IT
There's an extra "r" in the second word of that sentence.
Jim
Just my two cents :-D
proposed bill. Everyone should do the same.
they are Wrong
F. the lies
I want proof
People need to stand up and DEMAND PROOF before these kinds
of things are allowed. "Oh, we can't because the terrorists will
(whatever)" BS! If there's so many terrorists all around, why
don't we hear about them?
There's still a lot of time left in the Bush term, so we need to
protect our rights by questioning every new legislation that
takes away any rights. Demand proof of why the "new
protections" are needed.
This part makes think this article isn't exactly on solid ground.
The EFF has no info about this new bill on their site, and there is no bill # in the article to lookup for more information about it.
How can you write to your senator's about something if you don't even have the Bill # to reference?
I say shenanagins and FUD until something more concrete is given here.
You make multiple false assumptions. First, you assume that draft legislation that has not been introduced yet has a bill number (it doesn't). Second, you assume that something isn't real unless it appears on EFF's web site (also untrue, and silly to boot). The article quoted EFF's position on this, anyway, so that should be good enough for you. Third, you didn't read the article closely enough to realize that Gonzales has been talking about this for a while:
http://news.com.com/Justice+Dept.+pushes+stiffer+antipiracy+laws/2100-1028_3-5944612.html
now. Symantec in court defending it's reverse engineering of the
latest virus against the DMCA.
:-)
According to the Constitution of the United States, the executive
branch of the United States government cannot introduce bills in
congress. If the excerp quoted above is correct, then this situation
can be compared to the 2000 elections, when the judiciary branch
overstepped its Constitutional rights and decided the outcome of
the Presidential race.
Excuse me, I need to catch a flight to Canada.
This happens all the time. Congressmen of the incumbent presidents party always introduce legislation on behalf of their president.
Congratulations to Declan McCullagh on a well written, thought provoking, article. Great reporting!
Examples: DOS, they bought that, and for peanuts. Windows, they copied both Apple and Xerox on that. The Windows layout was never copyrighted. Stacker, a disk compression program, they copied that, lost when sued, and then bought them out. The BEOS operating system, they drove them out of business, was sued and lost in court, and had to pay millions.
Microsoft has an on staff collection of lawyers. I'm sure they still research the copyrights and patents on products, then weigh in the costs of either buying, copying, or the penelties when sued, or if the company, whose product(s) they've copied, would, or even could sue them in court.
I don't know of anything that Microsoft came up with, from scratch. It's always been someone else's ideas that Microsoft built upon, which they've been very successful at.
We have seen how the government (mis)handled dealing with Microsoft's misbehavior, so the only viable solution is a general boycott of their products. Spread the word!
As to the string of infringement you have alleged, the more fitting accusation is monopolistic and anticompetitive practices.
The only people who "lose" money here are the movie company or the software publisher.
Therefore, I fail to understand why congress is ready to even consider passing a bill that would put people in jail for 10 years just because of copyright infringement (hey, that's more than what some felons who committed assault get).
When are people going to get it? Theft is theft. Doesn't matter whether you appropriate your neighbor's car, a stranger's TV, or intellectual property. Taking it without payment or permission is stealing.
Sorry, I have to take issue with that. A culture of piracy is a culture that kills creativity. How many new creative ideas do you see coming out of China these days? Not many considering the size, education, and technical expertise of the Chinese population.
It's like bootleg liquor. Taking a drink didn't impact society, but the organised crime that sprang up to supply those drinks was a catastrophy.
Who is going to sit down and write a novel, let alone make a movie, if they are never going to get paid for doing it? Unless you want such people retained by the state like the "People's Artists" of the Soviet Union, you need some sort of copyright enforcement. Leaving it to civil law means letting the fat cats win every time. A law that isn't enforced is a waste of time.
>are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities.
Oh really. Had to throw the old "but what about the terrists?" in
there. These SOBs will use that card to justify anything. He
forgot to mention the overwhelming role that $73 per barrel oil
plays in funding the terrists. He is either the most ignorant man
alive (were talking Lois Lane ignorant here) or an evil
Machiavellian liar. Either way, there is no excuse to have
someone like him as the US attorney general.
Vote Democrat in November.
Hell, a handbasket and the USA sure seem to have a lot in common these days.
Congress and the Bush administration keep trampling our rights because they are despots. They are ****** that depend upon the likes of the entertainment industry to keep their pockets lined. The citizenry has no say in a government that refuses to listen. Democracy, in that case, is dead.
If 'copyright holders can impound "records documenting the manufacture, sale or receipt of items involved in" infringements' then the FSF would be able to do it with records related in violations of the GPL, including the source code of closed source applications suspected in violationg the GPL.
It works both ways.
Now tools should be made to protect open source software from being used in ways that are inconsistent with their licenses, so that DRM software/hardware that interferes with their function would enter the legal definition of what is not allowed by the new expanded DMCA. If redistribution is interfered with in any way the permisions granted by an open source license become void, and the tool that allows copying the software in this condition is trying to bypass the limitations that were set by the copyright owner. So it seems to me that these new laws in the right circumstances would make DRM tools into copyright protection circumvention tools.
Under this expansion, First4Internet would have gone to jail and possibly SonyBMG for being co-conspirators.
Perhaps it's time for another migration...
Don't vote Republican this year or in 2008. Don't vote Democrat this year or in 2008.
VOTE INCUMBENTS (even the ones you like) OUT OF OFFICE. One way or another, we need change.
Information, communication and the internet needs to be open and free, and other countries will develop a model to sustain these entertainment industries without copyright. Just one more industry that will go offshore, because it refused to adapt. (ghost town Hollywood)
Ultimately force all consumers to upgrade to locked systems, just to view the contents, and if you sell it, the next owner has to repurchase the rights and keys for additional fees and charges, just the type of dream machines that control freaks like Howard Stringer at SONY central, will foist upon us all in the not too distant future!
Need one say more, congress weenies!, selling out our rights for one cent in the dollar, thanks guys for showing your true yellow colors to all, if you vote for this crap!
was a regular viewer of The Screensavers. It was there that I first
heard about the EFF. After quite a bit of research, I decided that
they were worth supporting and I've been a member ever since.
If you don't like what's going on, you might want to check them
out. http://www.eff.org
- bitter irony
- by SeizeCTRL April 23, 2006 6:32 PM PDT
- For a country based in freedoms we sure do pass a lot of laws taking those same freedoms away.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Based in freedoms?
- by A.Sinic April 25, 2006 12:11 AM PDT
- Hmm. American talks a lot about being based on freedom, but the evidence is a little shaky.
- Like this
-
- Based in freedoms?
- by A.Sinic April 25, 2006 12:12 AM PDT
- Hmm. American talks a lot about being based on freedom, but the evidence is a little shaky.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 4 pages (167 Comments)Freedom to drive native Americans off the land which they had been legally granted in treaties with the British?
Freedom to trade and keep human slaves?
Freedom to witch-hunt people for association with possible communists?
I really love America, but if you think that Freedom has ever been the real driving force, you need to take off the rose tinted glasses. Like EVERY other country, American is founded on "What's best for us" (and usually that means best for the ruling class).
Freedom to drive native Americans off the land which they had been legally granted in treaties with the British?
Freedom to trade and keep human slaves?
Freedom to witch-hunt people for association with possible communists?
I really love America, but if you think that Freedom has ever been the real driving force, you need to take off the rose tinted glasses. Like EVERY other country, American is founded on "What's best for us" (and usually that means best for the ruling class).