Comments on: Senators propose taxing Internet shopping
Online and mail order purchases aren't always hit with sales taxes today. But Congress may make those taxes mandatory.
Online and mail order purchases aren't always hit with sales taxes today. But Congress may make those taxes mandatory.
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
But really its just a loophole that is unfair to traditonal retailers.....
A half century ago my father recieved a catalog in the U.S. mail (unsolicited) from a company not in his state. He ordered an item from it over the phone and had it shipped directly to his house. The state he was in had absolutely NO say over this practice. (The U.S. constitution forbids states from controlling interstate commerce.)
Many years ago I saw an advertisement on television for an item from a company not in my state (NO, it was not one of those "three easy payments of $19.99" deals.). I used the phone to place my order and had it shipped directly to my house. The state I was in had absolutely NO say over this practice. (The U.S. constitution forbids states from controlling interstate commerce.)
Today I shop for things over the internet and buy things from companies not in my state. I have them shipped directly to my home. Why does anyone NOW think my state should have say over this practice. Why should my state now be able to tax this practice?
Does not the U.S. Constitution still forbid states from controlling interstate commerce? A federal law attempting to allow this practice should still be unconstitutional.
Republican LIARS. Republican LIARS.
I consider it double-taxation to tax the sales of items with
money that has already been taxed (just for earning it). But the
states don't care -- they'd do much more if they could get away
with it.
What I think everyone needs to demand is some accountability.
Seems all they care about is raking in more of your money. I
wish I could just DEMAND more money from my boss with zero
accountability!!
Frankly, if the government combined all those taxes into a single source they'd face a new tax revolt as people came to realize just how heavily they're really taxed.
These people will be remembered come election time!
Within the next few days I will write each Senator and Representative and let them know this.
I suggest everyone else do to.
The corporations (online retailers) are currently taxed on their revenue, and we (the consumers) are taxed on our income (both federally and, for many, at the state and local level)... it seems to me that continued taxing of "the transaction" would be the third tax assessed... and if it is done under federal law... that means it's under federal jurisdiction and control. Dang, for a republican administration and republican congress, it sure sounds like we are centralizing this control.
Finally, the internet (and incentives to buy via the internet, such as no sales taxes) is actually good for the small business or "Main Street" retailer. Basically it is one of the few remaining equalizers and ways for SMB's to compete against the big box, high volume retailers (how much is your TV at Wal-Mart or Circuit City vs. your local TV shop... in fact, are there any local TV shops left?) It is just as easy for the local TV shop to put together an online store (and trust me, it can EASILY be done)... do a little marketing and suddnely they are competitive again (and surviving to pay their taxes). Charging sales taxes for those online transactions would actually put them right back where they were... dying.
that a "sales" tax is literally a tax on goods sold, which ought to
mean that a state has no right to collect that tax from an out-of-
state seller. If a state want to enact a purchase tax that it can force
its residents to pay on all purchases, regardless of where they
occur, that is an entirely different matter.
So why are they trying to spoil one thing that makes internet so
nice?
- Technically, we should all antie up
- by hkillham February 2, 2006 5:38 PM PST
- Technically, it is use tax that should be paid to your home state. Paying use tax is not voluntary. Ask any businessman who has gone through a state audit lately.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(28 Comments)