Comments on: Senate rebuffs Bush on Patriot Act
Bipartisan vote defies the president and makes pro-civil liberties reforms more likely when Senate returns in January.
Bipartisan vote defies the president and makes pro-civil liberties reforms more likely when Senate returns in January.
December 29, 2009 8:30 PM PST
December 29, 2009 3:53 PM PST
December 29, 2009 2:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Undoubtedly, we will now see the extreme right wingers, using Fox Media, come out swinging with every piece of misinformation and other KARL ROVE arms length dirty third texas party roundhouse style tatics, to slag these good senators, who are trying to do the right thing!
White House real soon now?
That special prosecutor guy seems pretty
determined to get him, and Karl hasn't been
seen in public much lately. He hasn't even
showed up to receive payoffs from his friends
in the H1-B lobbyist community. . .
I'd say that Mr. Rove is too busy to slag for
the "Patriot Act" at this time.
If they had done their jobs right, this would not be an issue today. Heck if they had stood up to him in 2001, we might not be in a pointless and illegal war that has nothing to do with fighting terrorism, all the while Bin Laden has never even been in danger from us.
The fact is that Bush had a ton a power after 9/11 because of legit fear and the fear mongering done by him and his administration, and the senators just went along. Now that most people have seen Bush as the immoral, corrupt,incompetant moron that he is, and his popularity rating is in the toilet, these worthless senators have found a little backbone.
4 years too late. Everyone who voted for the treaonous patriot act should not only be voted out of office, but in jail on charges of treason.
Cowardice is not an american value.
Maybe they want to change the name from United States of America (USA...) to Union of Sorry State Realities (USSR)
power away from the States under the auspices of the Interstate
Commerce clause? It is amazing the rhetorical back-flips people
will do to justify consolidating federal power.
How about that non-existent right to privacy? How about free
speech being extended to cover anything you feel like doing?
How about Congress shall have sole power to declare war?
"Police" and "Humanitarian" actions are pure BS.
When Ginsburg started citing international law in her decisions
she should have been impeached on the spot.
Although I have to admit that I think things like meat inspections and other federal checks on corporate abuse are good. This wasn't an issue in 1776, but corporations have shown they can not be trusted to not harm people or the enviroment if there is a fast buck to be made in doing so.
There is your right to privacy!
Contrary to the miserly interpretations of "strict constructionists" (sic), the Constitution grants rights not specifically mentioned.
In reality Bush had secretly made the debate over the "Patriot Act" moot by signing an illegal executive order allowing the NSA to wiretap and monitor within the borders of the United States and against American citizens. This information follows on the heels of multiple court rulings against the use of cellphone tracking without court warrants that Federal Agencies have engaged in. Also it has come to light recently that various military intelligence agencies have recently been allowed to gather and share intelligence on Americans within this countries borders.
I think it's time to consider impeachment against this lawless Bush regime.
- Maybe the media pulled the wool over our eyes. They've been known to do it
- by casper2004 December 17, 2005 10:49 AM PST
- Maybe the Senate did pass the extension on the Patriot Act permanently and the media is just saying that they didn't to make us think our Senators actually care.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Why?
- by bobthepirate December 18, 2005 11:22 AM PST
- That wouldn't really work unless you are suggesting they also engineered a fake vote on C-SPAN too, which would take a lot of energy and time and would just be easier to just tell the truth. Besides, to some people that would send a message to people that the senators don't care about their safety because they don't support security. I'm not one of those people, but I'm just saying they are out there.
- Like this
-
- Why?
- by bobthepirate December 18, 2005 11:22 AM PST
- That wouldn't really work unless you are suggesting they also engineered a fake vote on C-SPAN too, which would take a lot of energy and time and would just be easier to just tell the truth. Besides, to some people that would send a message to people that the senators don't care about their safety because they don't support security. I'm not one of those people, but I'm just saying they are out there.
- Like this
-
- maybe....
- by Bob Brinkman December 19, 2005 9:15 AM PST
- I am a hyper intelligent rock that grew hands and figured out how to type this sentance, and you finaly gave me the chance to.
- Like this
-
(30 Comments)