Comments on: Bush administration objects to .xxx domains
Commerce Department raises concerns about a virtual red-light district for pornographers and asks that the process be halted.
Commerce Department raises concerns about a virtual red-light district for pornographers and asks that the process be halted.
December 3, 2009 9:01 PM PST
December 3, 2009 8:10 PM PST
December 3, 2009 7:45 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
The fact that Bush objects to XXX material isn't going to change anything. Wouldn't it be better to have this information easily identifiable? You could simply restrict all .xxx sites from schools, work, etc. Right now, a simple typo takes you to smut. Try www.whitehouse.com as a prime example. Isn't this the site you'd think of for the Whitehouse?
The fact that Bush objects to XXX material isn't going to change anything. Wouldn't it be better to have this information easily identifiable? You could simply restrict all .xxx sites from schools, work, etc. Right now, a simple typo takes you to smut. Try www.whitehouse.com as a prime example. Isn't this the site you'd think of for the Whitehouse?
.xxx is a silly idea anyway, just like .aero.
.xxx is a silly idea anyway, just like .aero.
All this new domain gives them is the chance to use the names of existing web sites for pornographic purposes, for example ibm.xxx wouldn't take you to a site where you'd get help from IBM.
Since they have no intention of leaving the .com and other existing domains and there's no checks to keep them from using the new domain to mock others, there's no valid reason for them to have a new domain of their own.
All this new domain gives them is the chance to use the names of existing web sites for pornographic purposes, for example ibm.xxx wouldn't take you to a site where you'd get help from IBM.
Since they have no intention of leaving the .com and other existing domains and there's no checks to keep them from using the new domain to mock others, there's no valid reason for them to have a new domain of their own.
The problem is that the noise is not driven by business or even social concerns. It is political and reason is a weak weapon in that battle.
Odder still is that it is the .xxx TLD that has caused the UN and the US -- at odds over just about everything, including the ownership of the Internet -- to partner. Strange bedfellows, indeed.
The problem is that the noise is not driven by business or even social concerns. It is political and reason is a weak weapon in that battle.
Odder still is that it is the .xxx TLD that has caused the UN and the US -- at odds over just about everything, including the ownership of the Internet -- to partner. Strange bedfellows, indeed.
My gripe is this:
"We're focusing our attention on the Department of Commerce and ensuring that we're building this as a voluntary (top-level domain) for responsible companies," Jason Hendeles, founder of ICM Registry.
It should be mandated that all pornographic sites be placed under the .xxx suffix.
I know. What is porno to me might not be to you. I'm talking the obvious porno sites, we can quibble about the 5% that may or may not deserve the .xxx suffix later.
Sure would make filtering out porno much easier if it's all at .xxx
My gripe is this:
"We're focusing our attention on the Department of Commerce and ensuring that we're building this as a voluntary (top-level domain) for responsible companies," Jason Hendeles, founder of ICM Registry.
It should be mandated that all pornographic sites be placed under the .xxx suffix.
I know. What is porno to me might not be to you. I'm talking the obvious porno sites, we can quibble about the 5% that may or may not deserve the .xxx suffix later.
Sure would make filtering out porno much easier if it's all at .xxx
And, don't tell me that some of those yelling haven't looked at some porn site. How would they know what a porn site looks like if they haven't seen one. It is not a case of "I'll know it when I see it" situation.
azell@aol.com
And, don't tell me that some of those yelling haven't looked at some porn site. How would they know what a porn site looks like if they haven't seen one. It is not a case of "I'll know it when I see it" situation.
azell@aol.com
.xxx IS a method of Protecting Our Children and those who choose not to not to view such material.
You CANNOT eliminate this material from the net Mr. Bush. With this you can at least provide some more protection for those who need it !
.xxx IS a method of Protecting Our Children and those who choose not to not to view such material.
You CANNOT eliminate this material from the net Mr. Bush. With this you can at least provide some more protection for those who need it !
Pausing for Though,
CR
Pausing for Though,
GS
Pausing for Though,
CR
Pausing for Though,
GS
This is a faulty plan with a great idea being used as a ruse to get it approved.
This is a faulty plan with a great idea being used as a ruse to get it approved.
- Great Idea
- by August 16, 2005 10:40 AM PDT
- Force all XXX sites to conform with it and there can be software made to block these sites. Otherwise, there is no way to block them.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- there is no way to block
- by George Cole June 1, 2007 6:29 PM PDT
- http://www.analogstereo.com/peugeot_806_owners_manual.htm
- Like this
-
Showing 2 of 6 pages (229 Comments)