Version: 2008

Comments on: E-mail wiretap case can proceed, court says

Surprise decision: Federal appeals court changes its mind and says criminal trial of e-mail provider can proceed.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
only terrorists = liberals bitch + complain
by August 11, 2005 4:14 PM PDT
this is great!

only terrorists = liberals ***** + complain.

The truth is that SCO uses "insecure" and
"vulnerable" Linux more often than it uses its
own "SCO UNIX." See:

http://searchdns.netcraft.com/?host=.sco.com

Even more telling is the fact that SCO's and Al
Gore's lawyers, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP,
really put their trust in Windows Server 2003.
See:

http://searchdns.netcraft.com/?host=.bsfllp.co
m

cheers, IJH, M.D., Ph.D.

"If a woman shall testify, her testimony shall
be given half the weight of a man's."
--Q'uran
Reply to this comment
SCO's and Al Gore's lawyers
by George Cole June 1, 2007 6:38 PM PDT
http://www.analogstereo.com/suzuki_samurai_owners_manual.htm
only terrorists = liberals bitch + complain
by August 11, 2005 4:14 PM PDT
this is great!

only terrorists = liberals ***** + complain.

The truth is that SCO uses "insecure" and
"vulnerable" Linux more often than it uses its
own "SCO UNIX." See:

http://searchdns.netcraft.com/?host=.sco.com

Even more telling is the fact that SCO's and Al
Gore's lawyers, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP,
really put their trust in Windows Server 2003.
See:

http://searchdns.netcraft.com/?host=.bsfllp.co
m

cheers, IJH, M.D., Ph.D.

"If a woman shall testify, her testimony shall
be given half the weight of a man's."
--Q'uran
Reply to this comment
SCO's and Al Gore's lawyers
by George Cole June 1, 2007 6:38 PM PDT
http://www.analogstereo.com/suzuki_samurai_owners_manual.htm
Why don't more people simply encrypt their emails?
by Mallardd August 12, 2005 6:36 AM PDT
It's not very difficult to encrypt email using (in many cases free) public key encryption like PGP.... I wonder what the political scene in this regard would be like if more people simply encrypted their outgoing email? Would ISP/government eavesdropping even be an issue then?

http://www.gnupg.org/
Reply to this comment
Mere posession of PGP illegal?
by Too Old For IT August 12, 2005 9:12 AM PDT
At least in one juridiction in Minnesota, merely having (but not using) PGP on your computer means that you are a child molester. (Well, according to one elderly judge anyway.)

However, back to the story. Interpretet broadly, this could reign in some of the more draconian features of the (misnamed) Patriot Act.
View all 2 replies
Why don't more people simply encrypt their emails?
by Mallardd August 12, 2005 6:36 AM PDT
It's not very difficult to encrypt email using (in many cases free) public key encryption like PGP.... I wonder what the political scene in this regard would be like if more people simply encrypted their outgoing email? Would ISP/government eavesdropping even be an issue then?

http://www.gnupg.org/
Reply to this comment
Mere posession of PGP illegal?
by Too Old For IT August 12, 2005 9:12 AM PDT
At least in one juridiction in Minnesota, merely having (but not using) PGP on your computer means that you are a child molester. (Well, according to one elderly judge anyway.)

However, back to the story. Interpretet broadly, this could reign in some of the more draconian features of the (misnamed) Patriot Act.
View all 2 replies
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement