Comments on: Army punishes soldier for blog posts
A 40-year-old National Guardsman on active duty in Iraq is charged with blogging "classified" information in violation of military rules.
A 40-year-old National Guardsman on active duty in Iraq is charged with blogging "classified" information in violation of military rules.
November 23, 2009 5:45 PM PST
November 23, 2009 5:17 PM PST
November 23, 2009 5:02 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
sing don't expect for the top brass to think that your special.
Hey its a political war, should be interesting to read this 10 year
from now and all the crazy stuff, maybe I will get one history
account of Vietnam and another of Iraq, should be good reading,
buy hey 10 billion dead in combodia and we did nothing, so who
cares just don't call me for any of this.
sing don't expect for the top brass to think that your special.
Hey its a political war, should be interesting to read this 10 year
from now and all the crazy stuff, maybe I will get one history
account of Vietnam and another of Iraq, should be good reading,
buy hey 10 billion dead in combodia and we did nothing, so who
cares just don't call me for any of this.
Just because he disagrees with the current administration, (He's well within his rights to have an option) does not give him the rigt to post clasified information without retrobution.
My question is if he disagrees so much with the war, what is hs still in the guard? Why didn't he leave befor he was called to active duty?
I do wonder how much of this is just him being sore for being defeated for governer?
- Polotics aside...
- by startiger August 3, 2005 9:00 AM PDT
- He still broke the law. In WW2 he could be be shot as a spy for somthing like that. I would think that someone with the military experance that his guy had would know better than do something like that when he was in the middle of a combat zone. I'm suprised that's all the punishment that they gave him.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)Just because he disagrees with the current administration, (He's well within his rights to have an option) does not give him the rigt to post clasified information without retrobution.
My question is if he disagrees so much with the war, what is hs still in the guard? Why didn't he leave befor he was called to active duty?
I do wonder how much of this is just him being sore for being defeated for governer?