Version: 2008

Comments on: SpiralFrog inks music deal with Universal

Start-up to offer Universal songs for free, hopes to make money by showing ads to users as they download music.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Good Name
by TV James August 29, 2006 8:23 AM PDT
At least the spiral part.

I predict the frog will spiral the drain and SpiralFrog will not become economically viable.
Reply to this comment
Don't forget, frogs have warts..
by imacpwr August 29, 2006 2:42 PM PDT
Will the "free music" (with strings attached) be fully uncut or will it
come packaged like television does in the states, riddled with
advertisements? Once someone finds a hack to remove the ads and
the Windows Media Audio format is cracked, then you can see the
end of copy protection and an end to "free music" (with strings
attached).
Reply to this comment
Like a frog, this will croak..
by imacpwr August 29, 2006 2:56 PM PDT
Will the "free music" (with strings attached) be fully uncut or will it
come packaged like television does in the states, riddled with
advertisements? Once someone finds a hack to remove the ads and
the Windows Media Audio format is cracked, then you can see the
end of copy protection and an end to "free music" (with strings
attached).
Reply to this comment
just what the world needs!
by Dalkorian August 29, 2006 3:50 PM PDT
To be inundated with advertising regularly in order to listen to
music. As if I am not flooded with ads regularly already - on radio,
TV, public transit, billboards, hell just look to the right of this
comment!

Sorry, I'd rather give my business to the PIRATES!! I have no respect
whatsoever anymore for those PIRATES that claim to be the music
industry. Let them sue me when I'm dead, I just don't care
anymore. To hell with them all.
Reply to this comment
just like video clips on Fox and CNN
by pmbx August 30, 2006 12:13 PM PDT
The same reason I don't watch video clips on these news web sites
is the same reason this kind of business plan will fail. I HATE sitting
through the VIDEO ads just to get to meager video content. You
know $0.99 is a SMALL price to pay to not have such an irritation in
life as ads.
Reply to this comment
Pirates, eh, matey?
by smaesquire August 30, 2006 1:23 PM PDT
I wonder how much of the ad revenue will actually go to the artists. I think the way most recording contracts work, the artist won't even see any royalty revenue from this because it's not considered a sale. Personally, I like sites like www.zaziggy.com where the artist actually gets half the ad revenue for an ad sponsored download. No pirates there!
Reply to this comment
Company Greed
by tonyspencer2 September 3, 2006 11:26 PM PDT
Well this is the prime obstacle at the moment. Universal is all right,
but there is no mechanism for paying the artists.

They also forget that you might have your laptop or MP3 player
away from an internet connection for more than a month, like in
the middle of Africa or the Australian Bush, or on an oil rig...

Just goes to show that all the recording companies are interested in
is their expense account lunches not the starving artists.
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement