Comments on: Supercharged college P2P network closes

I2Hub, a file-swapping network piggybacking on the Internet2 research network, posts its own epitaph.

Who pays?

I definitely don't condone using swapping networks for exchange of copyrighted materials (music, movies, software, etc.), but I think that a swapping service for universities has its place. The sharing of student or faculty generated works and research between universities can be beneficial. But, the question is, how do you police a file swapping network? All of that aside, the point that I take issue with the most is the fact that I imagine a fair amount of my tax money was used to build Internet2 and I want it to be used for education and research, as I think it was meant to be used.

[tatyanab]

Tuition

I pay 42 grand a year for college. It's not coming out of your tax dollars.

[digitallysick]

back in the day

People will always pirate things, regardless i remember back in the day when they had just created an "mp3" they would upload them to geocities, for you to download, but then they decided to crack down on mp3z, so they would name then song.zip, and you would have to rename them .mp3, it will always go on, the best thing for hollywood to do instead of restrict it, is to try to market it, look at apple, they are doing excellent with itunes, why not movies the day they hit the theatres???

[nightveil]

Because

the theater owners need to be paid and the studios need to recoup
the money spent on the movie. Theater revenues might be smaller
overall than they used to be, but they still account for goodly sized
chunk of a movies revenues.

[dwosilverdragon]

Who truely suffers in this?

To think because I downloaded this one song this week that Justin Timberlake(just a random superstar nothing personal justin) will not be able to put gold handles on his bently this week. Or because I downloaded Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory, Mr. Johnny Depp will have to wait a week before he can go to his private island in the Bahamas. We are seriously ruining these people's lives. They cant build there 100 foot deep pools or buy their multimillion dollar mansions if we continue to download and freely exchange music, movies and programs. I am a college student. Right now my finance are so limited that I can barely afford to do my laundry. When I manage to save some money I like to go the movies. Which do basically cost $10 now and thats with popcorn or soda. But I enjoy myself. And there are hundreds of millions of people who do the same. But if I really strapped for cash because I need to pay for o lets say college tution, rent, car, and food I would like to be able to download the movie. Things thats are downloaded off the internet are never a good a quality as seeing them live. That is a fact. I enjoy concerts, movies and non-pirated software cause they are live and are of a much better quality. But this crusade against downloading is unpatriotic and futher more it holds back technology from progessing. In the privacy of my own home, on my computer, on the internet which I have to 50 dollars a month to use, I should be in liberty to access any information avilable to me. If the RIAA keeps on killing off this service providers we will soon be left with nothing but the news to read online. There are so many more use for the internet then the news. My final point in this matter is if the musicians say they do for the love of the music, then why the law suits?