Comments on: YouTube could be a steal at $1 billion
news analysis Sony's acquisition of video-sharing company Grouper could mean big bucks to others in online video.
news analysis Sony's acquisition of video-sharing company Grouper could mean big bucks to others in online video.
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
They are out of their minds if they think someone will pay $2 billion for a company whose revenues are probably in the low millions and losses in the tens of millions. Did we not learn the lessons of the last internet bubble from only 6 years ago???
They are going to regret not taking that $750 million (also way too much) offer.
ConstantClick.com will put a bid in. If they bid more than a 1
billion they've pverpaid.
It is evilly ironic the the headlines for the commercial shout YOUR CONGRESSMEN WANT TO BLOCK CHEAPER CABLE...
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAH....
Gosh, the TV said it was true.. you mean everything on TV isn't true?
Sony Pictures bought Grouper for its P2P technology platform which can be used for other things like distributing its vast video catalog in a cost efficient way. The Grouper web site and user base were just frosting on the cake...that they may throw away.
Video sharing sites and services are hot now. There are new services emerging every week. The technology is simple. There is no significant barrier to entry. YouTube was founded in February 2005...just 18 months ago.
I was a VP at the original Napster. YouTube has many similarities. I wrote a blog on this subject today. http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2006/08/youtube_worth_a.html
Will history repeat itself?
Even YAHOO was only 23 cents a share. Then, in a mainstream sort of way, advertises saw that they could recapture lost TV eyeballs. Then, the process was egalitized by google adwords and yahoo publishing, so the smallest website can be monetized.
Yes, traffic _is_ the new currency. Content (which users really love to provide for free in utbe, myspage, etc.) is the new Wealth, and bandwidth is the expensive fuel needed to run that engine. I hear YouTube spends a Megabuck a month on bandwidth. That would double if the Incumbents have their way.
<include>my Net Neutrality rant.</include>
Sony has a huge catalog of film clips, concert footage and music videos. With all that content, it will be a piece of cake to build an audience. All they needed was the technology platform. Sony doesn't need a video of your cat to be popular.
With the loss of so much record store traffic lately (note the Tower Records bankruptcy) and the great in-store promotions that gave sony records, they need more promotion channels. This creats a new one for them on the web.
The extrapolation to $1 billion is silly.
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060824.html
Think of how much Sony will be filing suits against YouTube once users start stealing videos from Grouper and posting them on YouTube.
YouTube could be worth $1B or it could be worth $50M - the only way to know is once its monetized (via commercials) and REAL supply&demand works its way. Giving stuff for free will ALWAYS have unnaturally high demand.
Since i was already making web pages, when Google adsense came along, the checks started coming in immediately.
I agree with fictia, if you have good content, it is foolish to give it away. I have thought about some kind of ad revenue sharing for my photo web sites. If google would do the reporting and paying, i won't even have to waste hours of time figuring out 1099 forms, etc.
I do use free content sites, however, and in return for my content (i don't see any 5 cents a word checks from CNET for my deathless prose in their comments, for example) i get an increase in "Google Juice" as well as actual traffic.
Giving stuff away free attracts thieves who, after all, are, by definition, people that want things free. It also provides a creative venue and SOCIAL NETWORKING. Myspace is not really "FREE," after all, it is ADVERTISER SUPPORTED. So their problem is to keep advertising revenues ahead of bandwidth costs.
<--! paste net nutrality rant here -->
WHAT A JOKE! Viacom must have not even visited the stupid site when they put that bid in. I wouldn't give Facebook a dollar and a pack of gum for their site.
Tell you what, give me $750 million and I'll bet my life I can make a site like MySpace, and get it more hits then Facebook.
See examples at richoblog at blogspot.com.
RicRicho is a handle for technologist Ric Richardson.
- Youtubes competition
- by thetiger1974 September 21, 2006 8:48 AM PDT
- What do you think about all the new online contest sites like googlesidol.com i think its called nbc?s star tommorow myidolworld.com and the other video sites. How will these sites affect the market that youtube has.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(19 Comments)