Version: 2008
  • On CHOW: Sexy vampire party

Comments on: Microsoft roots for the home team--Windows

The software giant offers a steep discount on live Webcasts of Major League Baseball games--but only to Windows users. Mac users have to pay full price, and Linux fans are out of luck.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
No big deal...
by Earl Benser April 8, 2004 5:34 AM PDT
I don't use a PC, I don't watch baseball. I don't use MSN. Seems
as though there's no reson to care about MS's latest leverage
maneuver- other than perhasp a legal point or two.
Reply to this comment
"Money For Microsoft" by Dire Warning
by David Mohring April 8, 2004 6:13 AM PDT
The realization that to get DRM'ed content will require you to do so though Windows XP and/or Microsoft ...

[ With deepest apologies to Mark Knofler and Dire Straits ]

"Money for Microsoft" by Dire Warning
Sung by Steve Ballmer, backing by Bill Gates

You must buy ...
You must buy Win-XP

You must buy ...
You must buy Win-XP

You must buy ...
You must buy Win-XP

You must buy ...
You must buy Win-XP

Now look at them bozo's that's the way you do it
You lock them always on the Win-XP
That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
Money for Microsoft from Dot Net usage fees
Now that ain't workin' thats the way we do it
Lemme tell ya them guys are dumb
Maybe get a licence on your little desktop
Maybe get a licence on everyone

They gotta install Media Player
Passport Dot-Net deliveries
They gotta take these applications
They gotta take these subscription fees

Look at that, look at that

See the little Win-Troll spreading spin we makeup
Yeah buddy thats our own fear
That little Win-Troll got them always complain'
That little Win-Troll makes us billionares

They gotta install Media Player
Passport Dot-Net deliveries
They gotta take these applications
They gotta take these subscription fees

They shoulda learned to use the Linux
They shoulda learned to use them Macs
Look at that user, we got it stickin' to the customer
Man we could have some fun
And their down there, whats that? Protesting noises?
Plannin' on me dancing like a chimpanzee
That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
Get the money for Microsoft get our usage fee

They gotta install Media Player
Passport Dot-Net deliveries
They gotta take these applications
They gotta take these subscription fees

That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
You lock them always on the Win-XP
That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
Money for Microsoft from the license fee
Money for Microsoft from subscription fees

David Mohring - Original author

See: A plea for relief from Microsoft's escalating anti-competitive tactics.
http://itheresies.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_itheresies_archive.html
An open letter to antitrust, competition, consumer and trade practice monitoring agency officials worldwide.
Reply to this comment
Bogus argument
by TV James April 8, 2004 9:10 AM PDT
My Verizon DSL service comes with free MSN Premium. And my MSN Premium comes with free MLB games. Those bastards!

This is a bogus argument. To read most of the content on Entertainment Weekly, you have to have an AOL account, subscribe to Entertainment Weekly, or buy a copy on the newsstand. Big deal.

Microsoft made a business arrangement with Major League Baseball that made more sense to MLB than their Real did. Which means that someone somewhere (Microsoft) is subsidizing the cost for the low cost subscription.

I seriously doubt that a lot of Mac users are complaining because there isn't an MSN Premium for them. And if Microsoft made one, I doubt a lot of Mac users would use it since they blindly hate all things Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
MLB obliged to work with Real Player
by hutchike April 8, 2004 9:23 AM PDT
As I understand it, Real Networks has a contract with MLB Advanced Media that obliges MLB to provide content in Real's format. If this is the case, then I can't see how MLB or Microsoft can lock-out Mac and Linux users, since Real Player works on all these platforms? Somebody should investigate this further...
Reply to this comment
re:MLB obliged to work with Real Player
by April 8, 2004 10:13 AM PDT
I am sorry but you seem to be ignorant on this case. Real has nothing to do with MLB anymore, their contract has been expired or is expiring soon. MLB can sell its content to anybody they want, Real didn't like the deal with MLB and thus they didn't renew it. Also Real is trying to force its users to buy expensive other content. When you try to download their free real player they are trying to trick you into buying lots of other stuff they are selling.
I support Microsoft's decision
by April 8, 2004 10:07 AM PDT
I think News.com is trying to make a big deal out of this, but as a consumer I don't see a problem at all. It is just another CNet's attack on Microsoft for competitors.
Reply to this comment
Just like NFL Ticket
by April 8, 2004 10:50 AM PDT
How is this any different than Direct TV having a monopoly on NFL games? Except for the price being higher for the football games and the fact the signal is received on my TV not my PC? In the case of the NFL/Direct TV relationship I have to get a dish, subscribe to a certain level and then pay at least $179 for four months of football!

I agree with earlier comments, just the press piling on Microsoft!!
Reply to this comment
Naaa a Monopoly does hurt the market.
by Jonathan April 8, 2004 12:27 PM PDT
THIS is the exact reason why Microsoft should have gotten the smack down during the antitrust trial. But just like a negligent parent the DOJ let them off with a warning.

For all you parents in the crowd tell me what happens when a child is never deciplined and taught right from wrong.

This is BS pure and simple.
Reply to this comment
Microsoft is abusing its monoply position
by April 8, 2004 1:28 PM PDT
Microsoft continues to surprise me with its complete and utter disregard for antitrust laws. Especially since it had so much trouble with it in the past. IBM was in the court for anitrust violations and so was Intel. Neither of them lost but they have both learned from that experience and it shows. Microsoft on the other hand lost but is back to its old ways of doing business and is flagrantly showing the middle finger to competition.
Reply to this comment
No, CNET is abusing its monopoly
by April 8, 2004 2:53 PM PDT
It is CNet which really abuses its monopoly by cheating against its customers, not Microsoft. For example, Office 2003 is available only for Windows, because it is meaningless to offer it for Linux. The macoffice is not office 2003 and it is a software by itself. So I think CNet is really cheating their readers by misguiding them to attack Microsoft. I personally know that CNet reporters hate Microsoft and probably getting paid by some of its competitors.
Hooray for M$N & Up Yerz
by April 8, 2004 2:18 PM PDT
This is just another example of Micro$oft's piggish ways. Their
'innovation' is bought or stolen, if they can't buy or steal it, they
simply crush it. Micro$oft is a boil on the butt of humanity!
Don't feed the pig -- eliminate any and all M$ software from
your life and be free!
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement