Comments on: Audible nabs popular podcast

Ricky Gervais' show, very popular on iTunes, moves to paid-only format through audio book specialist Audible.

Good luck with that

I dropped my Audible.com subscription a couple of months ago
because there's so much good, free content available on the web.
Plus, I didn't have time to listen to it all anyway.

So good luck with charging for a 'cast. I'm backed up enough on
plenty of other great listens I couldn't possibly justify paying for
anything at the moment. Maybe if they all go to crap though. ...

[J.G.]

Is Audible looking for trouble?

I've found myself using Audible and Fictionwise less since more
content became available for the iPod. I will listen to or watch a
podcast or movie on my iPod instead of listening to a book, as I
used to do during my PDA days. My last PDA was a Palm
Tungsten C and I can't say I miss it at all.

Apple saved Audible's bacon by making it the favored audiobook
provider at the iTunes Music Store. It seems to me that Apple
might be offended by Audible taking popular podcasts from it.
Apple doesn't profit from podcasts, but they can attract buyers
of other content to iTMS.

I realize that Audible needs to do something to make up for loss
of PDA users as sells declined, but this maneuver looks like it
could get Audible in trouble with Apple.

[KsprayDad]

Yummy!

I would LOVE to pay for a Podcast....right after I yank my teeth through my intestines and right out of my arse.

[zincmann]

FREE FREE FREE.....

Never going to pay for any net content again...havent paid for a CD since 1998, app or DVD. Surely WONT pay for Podcast. Just saddens me that so many people will pony up for it, but I am sure someone will then share it on a P2P network for FREE! Muhahaha...sorry a very childish rant! lol

[fronch]

Yeesh

You have not actually purchased one piece of content or
software this century and you are proud of this fact? Way to put
it to the man! I sure hope all those software developers,
musicians, actors, writers and directors enjoy working for free.
You know what kind of software and content we would get if no
one actually got paid to produce it? When you are sitting in your
hovel watching home made videos of people falling down their
stairs on your virus-laden crap PC while listening to your
neighbor's recording of himself on the pan flute and playing
hangman on your X-Box 2010 you can toast yourself for killing
several productive and entertaining industries at once! Bravo.

[earlrevans]

Comment from Audible seem unfriendly

"There will be a little bit of controversy because everybody wants something for free," Joseph said.

The fact that Audible is in business would seem to indicate that people are willing to pay for content. Of course everybody "wants" things for free. Who doesn't? It's a silly comment at face value. However, it seems to imply that people -insist- on things being free. This obviously isn't the case, or there wouldn't be an Audible at all, let alone iTunes with a gajillion downloads, Napster subscriptions, etc.

Note to content sellers: Stop provoking your potential customers, and get the chip off your shoulder.

-ee

[rcrusoe]

IMO, there will be no controversy

I think the only effect of moving to Audible will be a freefall of the Ricky Gervais Show from #4 on iTunes to Ricky who?

[paulsecic]

pod

I'm not paying for junk eitther.

[nic_brisbane]

revenue from podcasting

I?m involved with producing an up-and-coming podcast and would like to avoid using advertisements. I?ve come across SubscribeCast Technologies that supposedly can provide a way to charge customers as well as track use and abuse of the RSS feeds. I?m looking to find other companies that provide this in order to make a decision on which one to go with. Has anyone heard of SubscribeCast or know of any other way to fund a podcast without using advertiseing? Any thoughts would be appreciated!