Comments on: Senate may hoist broadcast flag again
The antipiracy measure for digital TV receives a boost in the Senate. A version intended for digital radio does not.
The antipiracy measure for digital TV receives a boost in the Senate. A version intended for digital radio does not.
December 4, 2009 7:16 AM PST
December 4, 2009 7:02 AM PST
December 4, 2009 6:57 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
legitimate use, it cannot be considered illegal. Why is it, then, that
every government leader has decided that the POTENTIAL rampant
piracy is worth overthrowing our rights as consumers? Any
recorder that does not have support for this broadcast flag has
legitimate, legal uses, yet they want to make such devices illegal.
Further, wasn't the VCR the best thing that happened to the
business in the long run?
Allowing consumers to record something and view/listen to it later for free is just plain bad for business because it represents lost sales. Consumers desire a product and are getting it for free in their eyes.
We were the lead group that brought the case that got the flag rules thrown out.
<<<A receiver that could easily record songs and shuffle the play order like Apple Computer's iPod, he warned, would mean the record labels would not get paid for the download.>>>
So, in other words, if we don't like the particular songs that a label chose to put on a CD we do not have the right to change that? We do not have the right to assemble a library of music that suits our listening style?
Get real... we (the consumer) pay the salary of: The performer, The recording studio, the marketing company and the fulfillment company.
If we, the consumers, would get together for once (i'd die of shock if we did) and refuse to play their game we could win! REFUSE to purchase hardware that places limits on our freedom. Refuse to purchase broadcast (or CD's / DVD's) with DRM.
Activly email our representatives our feelings and then VOTE for those who stand on a freedom platform. When we cut the profits of the media moguls they will beg people to buy their goods.
Remember, Boycott Sony!
Like, how is it different other than being digital? I can see an argument against songs being recorded and the placed on P2P, but that's an issue with P2P which is slowly being legislated out of existence. A home user recording any broadcast and using it in any personal way is not piracy and has been upheld as fair-use by the courts.
So the industry expects every law-abiding consumer to give up fair-use in order to prevent a problem that has not even been proven to have a large financial impact to the record companies. (No, they have not published definitive statistics showing large losses due to P2P. They've used coincidental statistics to suggest losses due to P2P.)
The industry is proposing that every song recorded off the radio is a lost sale... something that has never been true in either the analog or digital broadcast days.
Riaa should be sueing everyone, becase I don't know of anyone that has not made recoredings.
Use to when you bought a record you got a full recored of music you liked, now you may be lucky enought to get maybe 2 songs you like & the rest garbage. They should be paying us for advertiment.
- Blown out of preposition
- by Earl January 25, 2006 2:21 PM PST
- this whole thing is out of whake with the American why of life,(freedom).
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)Riaa should be sueing everyone, becase I don't know of anyone that has not made recoredings.
Use to when you bought a record you got a full record of music you liked, now you may be lucky enought to get maybe 2 songs you like & the rest garbage. They should be paying us for advertiment.