Comments on: Yahoo, Microsoft join IM hands
Companies to allow interoperability of their instant-messaging clients in a move against America Online and Google.![]()
Companies to allow interoperability of their instant-messaging clients in a move against America Online and Google.![]()
December 28, 2009 9:50 AM PST
December 28, 2009 9:48 AM PST
December 28, 2009 8:00 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
After thinking about recent news about Microsoft I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is losing their touch for being evil and I can see other companies taking the evil crown away from them. It was a good run but I guess all good er... evil things come to an end sometime.
All of this lawsuit settlement, blogging, and industry cooperation is starting to damage the evil image they worked so hard on achieving and is turning them into a big loveable software giant again.
They will have to really turn on the jets if they expect to prevent Apple or Google from stealing their crown of evil.
They're just realizing that if they con others into helping them crush their opponents, they'll just look less evil.
Microsoft + Yahoo! - Google? Yahoo?
Microsoft + AOL - Google? Yahoo? AOL itself?
Microsoft + Real - Apple
Microsoft + Apple - Sun
Microsoft + Sun - IBM? Macrodobe?
Who really benefits in all these pairings?
slopmarketing.blogspot.com
This has nothing to do with being more or less evil. All Corporations are "evil" - profit is the principle of capitalism, this is the driving force of everything built around us. As long as there is a profit to be made there is going to be a competition amongst those who want to make it. Sort of like a game of football or hockey - ther is only one ball/pack competition is great! Occasionally though we need a ref/government to keep everyone in line.
Back to the IM wars, Microsoft is never going to win this game 100% even if Yahoo decides to stick around all the way through. None Will!!!
Too many different services, too many standards, too many protected territories (patents). Watch now for Google starting buying other IMs and making them interoperable or signing a sim contract with other rivalry.
Michael
"Asked why it took them so long..., Rosensweig said: 'On a spiritual level, we feel like we're coming at this early.'"
So is Rosensweig saying that the reason IM interoperability hasn't happened is because God didn't want it to? Is this the Tower of Babel in reverse?
I think you guys are reacting and overestimating Google. No doubt it's a giant when it comes to search, but Microsoft comes to the same count when it comes to desktop. Hence, just condemning MS is not appropriate. Does not mean I support all their evil doing, but afterall it's business. Look at the benifits the users will gain after this union. MSN, Yahoo interoperable, AOL will defintely roll up its sleeves and bring out many more new things for the users. Google, which I personally consider a very small player will have to pitch in with many more features and again this will benifit the users. Ultimately, we the users are gonna gain so many benifits by this union! I guess we should look at this rather than being urchins about a crasher or overrating a security breaching web crawler...
- Not Global enough
- by sammadude July 12, 2006 5:48 PM PDT
- I'm waiting for google talk and skype compatability.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)