Comments on: Blue-chip ads, red-light content

Ads for major U.S. companies are appearing next to racy and extreme user-submitted content on popular sites.
Images: Brought to you by Blue Chips

[mrwavetheory]

Bubble 2.0 - Most Analysts Are Overestimating the Size of Google's Total Ad

Mr Wave Theory thinks that there is a Bubble 2.0 for Web 2.0 and Most Analysts Are Overestimating the Size of Google's Total Addressable Market for Internet Advertising

I am sick and tired of hearing analysts make wild projections about Google's growth prospects based on wild projections about the size of Google's total addressable market.

Continued ...

[mrwavetheory]

Link to Bubble 2.0

Oops forgot the link. Here it is ...

http://mrwavetheory.blogspot.com/2006/03/bubble-2.html

[djemerson]

We Need a New Story...

"Anybody got an idea?

I know! Elinor, troll the seedier side of the internet and look for
big name ads! I won't be satisfied until you find an Apple ad
next to borderline child pornography. Then, we'll pass the
whole thing off as a story!"

You ROCK, CNET!

[BobBobBobBobBobBobBob]

and they get paid for this?

nt

[jkarnell]

CNET Should Practice What They Preach!!!

http://www.otoinsights.com/2006/03/cnet_should_pra.html

[jzsaxpc]

Twisting relaity

So the beef here is not with Apple, or AT&T, but with stupid bloggers who write about "offencive" stuff.

Well, I'm sorry your sence of ethics is touched, but its called advertising, those companies twisted as they may be, pay for every time its on the page, they have no idea what is going to be on the page.

Right now, I could start talking about having sex with little boys, and ohhh, ummm, is that a story? Just because I'm a perv (not really, honestly...), does that make CNET responcible? Of course not.

ONly time I'll ever stick up for a large corperation and their advertising, in my life.