Comments on: Google to buy radio ad company
The search company, long a heavyweight in Internet advertising, to pay at least $102 million for DMarc Broadcasting.
The search company, long a heavyweight in Internet advertising, to pay at least $102 million for DMarc Broadcasting.
November 25, 2009 3:51 PM PST
November 25, 2009 3:35 PM PST
November 25, 2009 3:09 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Radio advertisement is strong. And as popular and convenient satellite radio is, it won't destroy terrestrial radio. Besides, it's only a matter of time before satellite radio starts to add more commercials and create a "premium" section which will cost more. Satellite radio won't be profitable until it starts to sell radio time. I foresee satellite radio going the way of satellite tv.
I'm a big fan of technology. But, the economic realities of any consumer-based technology is that sooner or later, ads will have to become part of it. Satellite radio will never come out of the red, until they start to bring in all those ads.
Just wait for Google's next move to go after a print ad company. It's a matter of time before Google becomes the biggest ad agency in all mediums.
No I don't own a single penny of Google stock. But, I do admire their bravado.
I'm guessing it refers to digital/satellite radio? Or do they mean systems that will listen to what the DJ is talking about and play ads that are related? GPS so you hear about the McFlurry special happening at the McDonalds across the intersection?
"If you want to learn more about laser eye surgery, press preset #1 on your car radio now."
I would assume Google could somehow determine the location of where clicks on AdWords are coming from and then inform the client "hey - you should buy radio time here, which by the way - we can help you do".
- thanks
- by TV James January 18, 2006 6:22 AM PST
- Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- cursed news.com
- by TV James January 18, 2006 6:23 AM PST
- once again, hit the "reply to story" instead of "reply to comment" button. argh.
- Like this
-
(5 Comments)News.com - if you're going to put the links side-by-side, then we need a move-up and move-left/move-right buttons to fix our incorrectly located comments.