Federal judge says he's sympathetic to problems that Tiffany faces in identifying counterfeit products on auction sites, but trademark law can't be used to compel eBay to police listings.
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.
About Digital Media
The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Digital Media topics
Same goes with Windows. Windows is not unique.
These technology companies create names that are not unique and based on previous familiar knowledge by consumers to sell a product and should not have this advantage to leverage marketing prominence. That's why I perfectly agree with the decision.
Your argument completely skirts the issue of forgery and counterfeit behavior who seek to take advantage of the prior reputation that some else invested in a trademark for their own grubby scheming. Your argument is completely bogus, because the POINT is that Tiffany & Co.--a jewerly maker among all of its other products--has identified a pattern of illicit transactions by others who are--guess what--selling Tiffany-branded jewelry that they presumably had made to cash in on someone else's reputation. Your wayward spin on the issue totally avoids that point.
The judge's decision was based not on whether Tiffany & Co. had any right to their trademark, because in his decision he more or less said they do. His rendering of his decision was based on the point that it's up to the trademark holder to police the use of its own name, and not the responsibility of a third-party like eBay. That said, I disagree with the judge's determination. Considering that Tiffany only sells their own products out of their own stores, it seems highly unlikely a third-party eBay seller would be able to have bulk quantities of REAL Tiffany product. eBay doesn't step in because in the end, it gets a percentage of all those illegal transactions. eBay talks a good game, but it would be bloody EXPENSIVE to have to police every seller that uses its services.
eBay got a reprieve with this ruling. But it's not over yet, especially in those nations that aren't so flippant about the rights of trademark and intellectual property owners.
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/NASAcert.html
SRD-BCCM
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/NASAcert.html
SRD-BCCM
http://tiffany-classic.com
tiffany jewelry http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_jewelry.html
tiffany jewellery http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_jewellery.html
tiffany ring http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_rings.html
tiffany rings http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_rings.html
tiffany bracelet http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_bracelet.html
tiffany earrings http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_earrings.html
tiffanys http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffanys.html
tiffany necklace http://tiffany-classic.com/tiffany_necklace.html
- by cartierlovejewelry October 8, 2009 12:42 AM PDT
- http://www.cartierlovejewelry.com/
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)http://www.cartierjewelry.co.uk/